am I the only one who thinks this rule needs to be looked at ....it just seems like teams are just taking shots down the field and hoping to get a PI call and get the ball at that location. it puts the CBs in a real tough spot. and frankly, it also kinda seems like the easy way out to move a drive.
would any1 else consider changing the rule? such as just making it a 15 yard penalty?
pass interference penalties
Moderator: bwgood77
pass interference penalties
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 56,838
- And1: 19,323
- Joined: Oct 05, 2002
Re: pass interference penalties
- Geddy
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 69,890
- And1: 78,609
- Joined: Nov 30, 2005
- Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
-
Re: pass interference penalties
Yup I would be all for an overhaul of that rule. It's stupid to assume the player would catch the ball automatically and just award them the spot of the foul. There have been too many games ruined by iffy PI calls where because of misplaced hand, the team on offense gets to march 40 yards down field.
These days the best receivers are great at initiating the contact and making it look like the defender was at fault. Not to mention it might cut down on that stupid 'throw the flag' gesture receivers do every time they don't make a catch.
10 to 15 yards would be good enough
These days the best receivers are great at initiating the contact and making it look like the defender was at fault. Not to mention it might cut down on that stupid 'throw the flag' gesture receivers do every time they don't make a catch.
10 to 15 yards would be good enough
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
Re: pass interference penalties
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,688
- And1: 27,270
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: pass interference penalties
Mike Pereira was on the radio a few weeks ago talking about this. He said he doesn't like the spot foul rule and would go to 15 yards like college if he had the choice, but the competition committee doesn't like 15 yards because they think that would cause all the DB's who are beat to just reach out and grab the receiver knowing it would only cost the team 15 yards instead of a spot foul or a touchdown.
He said he doesn't buy that because that doesn't happen in college and I agree with him.
He said he doesn't buy that because that doesn't happen in college and I agree with him.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: pass interference penalties
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,283
- And1: 810
- Joined: Jul 28, 2010
- Location: REALITY
-
Re: pass interference penalties
This has been happening since the NFL came into existence.
It's kinda odd that it became a subject on this Board right after the Bears won against the Packers.
It's kinda odd that it became a subject on this Board right after the Bears won against the Packers.
Re: pass interference penalties
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
Re: pass interference penalties
BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:This has been happening since the NFL came into existence.
It's kinda odd that it became a subject on this Board right after the Bears won against the Packers.
Yup.
The pass interference rules are fine. The DBs have just as much right to the ball as the receivers, so it's just a matter of getting their eyes on the ball and getting into position to make a play. If they can't do that and impede the receiver's ability to make a catch then they should be penalized. All they need to do is get their eyes on the ball, then they're welcome to impede the receiver's process so long as they're making a play on the ball as well.
The stupid rule that never should have come into existence is the illegal contact rule. You've already got PI and holding (rightfully so), so why do you need a rule that says you can't touch (but not impede) the receiver? What does it matter if a DB's hand is on a guy's hip, chest, shoulders, etc so long as he's not pulling/pushing on it?
Re: pass interference penalties
- CentralQB5
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 871
- And1: 47
- Joined: Jul 07, 2009
- Location: The GridIron
- Contact:
-
Re: pass interference penalties
I agree that they should look into fixing the bugs in this penalty. I can see making it a 15 yarder bc chucking the ball down field and hoping for the PI is getting a bit outta hand

Re: pass interference penalties
- Bleeding Blue
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,573
- And1: 538
- Joined: Feb 29, 2008
- Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
-
Re: pass interference penalties
I think the rule is fine, like stated previously DB's would be holding people like crazy. If u are gonna change a rule, change over paid rooks and protecting the QB's like crazy.
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"
- Bobby Knight
- Bobby Knight
Re: pass interference penalties
- CentralQB5
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 871
- And1: 47
- Joined: Jul 07, 2009
- Location: The GridIron
- Contact:
-
Re: pass interference penalties
^
true that QB's are being made into pretty boy sallys like there playing football
true that QB's are being made into pretty boy sallys like there playing football

Re: pass interference penalties
- CjayC
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,546
- And1: 1,169
- Joined: Mar 02, 2005
- Location: Hoiball
-
Re: pass interference penalties
DB's probably aren't taught to reach out and grab after being beaten in College because it is horrible preparation for the pro game. Now suddenly you have DB's being taught for 3 or 4 years in College that its ok to reach out and grab someone when you've been beat because its only a 15 yard penalty.
Now a pro team has to beat out of this guy the habits he learned in College. Heck they already have to spend team beating out bad habits that players learned in College in most cases.
Its just better fundamental football to have the DB to have some kind of accountability for what he does.
DB's would be reaching out all over the place in the NFL if it saved a TD. DB's grab and hold to save TD's even though they know they will give up the yardage all the way to the spot of the foul already. Only giving them 15 yard penalties for being beaten by a receiver makes them have no accountability whatsoever. Its basically a mulligan.
Fine in College for the most part, but anything can happen in the pro game.
Now a pro team has to beat out of this guy the habits he learned in College. Heck they already have to spend team beating out bad habits that players learned in College in most cases.
Its just better fundamental football to have the DB to have some kind of accountability for what he does.
DB's would be reaching out all over the place in the NFL if it saved a TD. DB's grab and hold to save TD's even though they know they will give up the yardage all the way to the spot of the foul already. Only giving them 15 yard penalties for being beaten by a receiver makes them have no accountability whatsoever. Its basically a mulligan.
Fine in College for the most part, but anything can happen in the pro game.
Re: pass interference penalties
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,031
- And1: 19,968
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
Re: pass interference penalties
The spotting of the ball isn't bad, the problem is how much more receivers can get away with as opposed to defensive players.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Re: pass interference penalties
- CjayC
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,546
- And1: 1,169
- Joined: Mar 02, 2005
- Location: Hoiball
-
Re: pass interference penalties
NO-KG-AI wrote:The spotting of the ball isn't bad, the problem is how much more receivers can get away with as opposed to defensive players.
I definitely agree that receivers get the benefit of the doubt. Even moreso now that, the illegal touching rule has come into play.
Return to The General NFL Board