RealGM

The Packers allowed absolutely no changes to their classic look, not even the most simple alteration in color or shade. The only difference is the Nike logo, according to spokesman Aaron Popkey.

Icness wrote:The Browns completely squashed any change too. The new Bengals gloves are selling real well.

Supposedly the fabric is a little more breathable.

I wonder how much this will hurt Reebok. Anyone out there got any Reeboks?

Reebok wants a ban lifted on its sale of apparel with the name of New York Jets quarterback Tim Tebow.

Reebok International Ltd. Tuesday asked a judge to end it. The company says it can prove it was not selling merchandise in violation of its expired 10-year licensing deal with the NFL.

The ban came after Nike Inc. filed a lawsuit last week, days after Tebow was traded from Denver to New York. Nike says in court papers it will lose a one-time opportunity if the ban on Reebok sales is lifted. Nike now has NFL licensing rights.

Da Schwab wrote:That's a new look for the Bears?

Friend_Of_Haley wrote:Big upgrade for the bears. Ever since the cut of jerseys pretty much eliminated sleeves the striping was inconsistent depending on where the player's jersey cut. Moving the numbers up allows for the stripes and gsh to be a prominent part of the uniform.

Interesting that I've read some repots say they've added a stripe when im not sure it was ever eliminated or just kept being cut off.


3 stripes in the 80's


3 stripes in the 90's, but one is basically part of the cuff


To current day where it seems they still use 3 stripes in an official capacity, but dont show up on the field (as the Urlacher pick above shows)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk