Re: NFC West
Posted: Thu Mar 9, 2017 1:24 pm
yeah he was replaced in Oakland by mid season
even with hoyer on board don't rule out a cousins to sf trade
even with hoyer on board don't rule out a cousins to sf trade
RealGM
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
NFC West
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=139&t=1475934
Page 8 of 12
Re: NFC West
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:47 am
Leary signs with the Broncos. Sad to see him go as well.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:56 am
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Leary signs with the Broncos. Sad to see him go as well.
Doesn't he have bad knees?
http://www.espn.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4692589/ronald-leary-undergoes-an-mri
Re: NFC West
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:58 am
Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Leary signs with the Broncos. Sad to see him go as well.
Doesn't he have bad knees?
http://www.espn.com/blog/dallas/cowboys/post/_/id/4692589/ronald-leary-undergoes-an-mri
Well, if he does, that's good for us and bad for them.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 3:53 pm
I see Peterson is meeting with the Sea Hawks tomorrow. Things apparently didn't go well with Charles. But Seattle likes the big punishing type backs anyways. We will see what happens.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 4:16 pm
bluejerseyjinx wrote:I see Peterson is meeting with the Sea Hawks tomorrow. Things apparently didn't go well with Charles. But Seattle likes the big punishing type backs anyways. We will see what happens.
AP isn't really a fit within our offense. I don't see it working out. Charles is still a possibility. Murray & Lacy make more sense.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:04 pm
Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:I see Peterson is meeting with the Sea Hawks tomorrow. Things apparently didn't go well with Charles. But Seattle likes the big punishing type backs anyways. We will see what happens.
AP isn't really a fit within our offense. I don't see it working out. Charles is still a possibility. Murray & Lacy make more sense.
I agree with this. I don't think AP would fit well with Seattle's scheme. Charles, a bit more so. But I can see why they wouldn't want to take a risk on a guy as injury-prone as him.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:26 pm
bleu wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:I see Peterson is meeting with the Sea Hawks tomorrow. Things apparently didn't go well with Charles. But Seattle likes the big punishing type backs anyways. We will see what happens.
AP isn't really a fit within our offense. I don't see it working out. Charles is still a possibility. Murray & Lacy make more sense.
I agree with this. I don't think AP would fit well with Seattle's scheme. Charles, a bit more so. But I can see why they wouldn't want to take a risk on a guy as injury-prone as him.
He doesn't. Russ plays mostly in the gun. Something AP doesn't do. He's also bad in pass-pro. Pete wants someone who will block well since they don't really use a traditional fullback.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:26 pm
I think Minnesota is the best fit for Adrian Peterson. He should try to work a deal at a cheaper rate, and resign with the Vikings.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:39 pm
Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:I see Peterson is meeting with the Sea Hawks tomorrow. Things apparently didn't go well with Charles. But Seattle likes the big punishing type backs anyways. We will see what happens.
AP isn't really a fit within our offense. I don't see it working out. Charles is still a possibility. Murray & Lacy make more sense.
I like the guy you already have the best anyway, C.J.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:57 pm
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:I see Peterson is meeting with the Sea Hawks tomorrow. Things apparently didn't go well with Charles. But Seattle likes the big punishing type backs anyways. We will see what happens.
AP isn't really a fit within our offense. I don't see it working out. Charles is still a possibility. Murray & Lacy make more sense.
I like the guy you already have the best anyway, C.J.
Prosise is good. He's been banged up. Which is why I'm not a big fan of either AP or Charles. Lacy or Murray are more durable.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:16 pm
Lacy & Rawls a two-headed monster 
Re: NFC West
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:15 pm
Cactus Jack wrote:Lacy & Rawls a two-headed monster
If you can keep them on the field and off IR, I agree.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:18 pm
Cactus Jack wrote:Lacy & Rawls a two-headed monster
More like a two headed band aid,
Re: NFC West
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:19 pm
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:Lacy & Rawls a two-headed monster
More like a two headed band aid,
Things will work themselves out. That's why we signed Lacy as an insurance policy. More durable than the other rb's available. We can also add someone in the draft. More depth the better. I expect Lacy to get most of the workload.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:50 am
Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:Lacy & Rawls a two-headed monster
More like a two headed band aid,
Things will work themselves out. That's why we signed Lacy as an insurance policy. More durable than the other rb's available. We can also add someone in the draft. More depth the better. I expect Lacy to get most of the workload.
This pretty much a last chance type of deal i think. If it doesnt work , he could be cut near the midway of the season.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:57 am
Ballerhogger wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:More like a two headed band aid,
Things will work themselves out. That's why we signed Lacy as an insurance policy. More durable than the other rb's available. We can also add someone in the draft. More depth the better. I expect Lacy to get most of the workload.
This pretty much a last chance type of deal i think. If it doesnt work , he could be cut near the midway of the season.
The Hawks wanted to draft him when he came out. I don't think they'll cut him unless he ballooned to like 300 lbs. He's going to have a significant role on the team. He's the perfect fit for what they look for (Big, physical, Yards after contact runner).
Re: NFC West
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:34 am
Cactus Jack wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:Things will work themselves out. That's why we signed Lacy as an insurance policy. More durable than the other rb's available. We can also add someone in the draft. More depth the better. I expect Lacy to get most of the workload.
This pretty much a last chance type of deal i think. If it doesnt work , he could be cut near the midway of the season.
The Hawks wanted to draft him when he came out. I don't think they'll cut him unless he ballooned to like 300 lbs. He's going to have a significant role on the team. He's the perfect fit for what they look for (Big, physical, Yards after contact runner).
True if it works out well , i could see him getting better deal. If he can pass block well for them and take some heat off Wilison it could be great signing.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 3:25 pm
Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:Lacy & Rawls a two-headed monster
More like a two headed band aid,
Things will work themselves out. That's why we signed Lacy as an insurance policy. More durable than the other rb's available. We can also add someone in the draft. More depth the better. I expect Lacy to get most of the workload.
Along with most of the donuts and cheeseburgers, lol.
Re: NFC West
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 3:32 pm
bluejerseyjinx wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:bluejerseyjinx wrote:More like a two headed band aid,
Things will work themselves out. That's why we signed Lacy as an insurance policy. More durable than the other rb's available. We can also add someone in the draft. More depth the better. I expect Lacy to get most of the workload.
Along with most of the donuts and cheeseburgers, lol.
I'm pretty sure he's more of a Hamburger & fries type.
