Week 7 Matchup and Game Discussion

Post #221 » by **bleu** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 1:51 am

jwise44 wrote:God our d has gotten torn to shreds the last 2 drives

I need 11 points out of them in fantasy... :-?

Otis Driftwood · Post #222 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 1:53 am

jwise44 wrote:God our d has gotten torn to shreds the last 2 drives

They're not getting much help from your offense though.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #223 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:03 am

bleu wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:There is nothing logical about you.

do the Pats make it to the SB or dont they? you cant tell me I'm lucky if it doesnt happen. You cant use odds as an excuse.
are you admitting you are guessing or not? I'm not guessing, I'm telling you they will not make it.
you are either confident the odds are in your favor or you arent. saying things like "well,unless someone gets injured" are no excuse. It either happens or it doesnt
I'm not betting you anything like money. Just asking, Can you commit to being right or wrong or cant you?

Here's the thing. NOBODY said that the Pats are going to the Super Bowl. BJJ never said that. Why would he say it now just because you're pushing him to? You said before the season that they wouldn't make the playoffs. That is obviously very false, so you're pushing off that fact by now insisting that they won't make the Super Bowl. Not many are going to argue there, and frankly, saying that they won't make the Super Bowl isn't bold one bit. I will say this though, they have a hell of a lot better shot than your pick, the Colts. Don't back down on that one too.

if they have a better shot than commit to whether they do or not.
I'm the only one specifying they wont make it to the SB.
I'm the only one with the balls to possibly be wrong.

You said before the season that they wouldn't make the playoffs. That is obviously very false,

no it isnt. It hasnt been decided yet.There is no obviously anything in that regard. you can decide this but cant commit to them making the SB or not?
I said they wouldnt make the playoffs because I figured they wont make the SB anyway. Now I'm conceding they might make post season while still saying they still wont make SB.

Post #224 » by **bleu** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:07 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bleu wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:

do the Pats make it to the SB or dont they? you cant tell me I'm lucky if it doesnt happen. You cant use odds as an excuse.
are you admitting you are guessing or not? I'm not guessing, I'm telling you they will not make it.
you are either confident the odds are in your favor or you arent. saying things like "well,unless someone gets injured" are no excuse. It either happens or it doesnt
I'm not betting you anything like money. Just asking, Can you commit to being right or wrong or cant you?

Here's the thing. NOBODY said that the Pats are going to the Super Bowl. BJJ never said that. Why would he say it now just because you're pushing him to? You said before the season that they wouldn't make the playoffs. That is obviously very false, so you're pushing off that fact by now insisting that they won't make the Super Bowl. Not many are going to argue there, and frankly, saying that they won't make the Super Bowl isn't bold one bit. I will say this though, they have a hell of a lot better shot than your pick, the Colts. Don't back down on that one too.

if they have a better shot than commit to whether they do or not.
I'm the only one specifying they wont make it to the SB.
I'm the only one with the balls to possibly be wrong.

That's not true at all. SEVERAL posters posted their Super Bowl predictions before the season started. You are certainly not the only person saying that they won't make it to the Super Bowl, just the only person wrong enough to say they won't make the playoffs. But you're backing down from that one.

Otis Driftwood · Post #225 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:14 am

The Village Idiot of Real GM.

Can't make it up

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #226 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:19 am

jwise44 wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:There is nothing logical about you.

do the Pats make it to the SB or dont they? you cant tell me I'm lucky if it doesnt happen. You cant use odds as an excuse.
are you admitting you are guessing or not? I'm not guessing, I'm telling you they will not make it.
you are either confident the odds are in your favor or you arent. saying things like "well,unless someone gets injured" are no excuse. It either happens or it doesnt
I'm not betting you anything like money. Just asking, Can you commit to being right or wrong or cant you?

Your argument makes no sense, though. Way easier to say someone won't make it than to argue one will.

lol no it isnt.
you either make the choice or you dont.
you believe its easier to believe they will make the playoffs therefore your reasoning is wrong. You cant have it both ways.

you say he's the best ever and then when pressured you say, well yeah but defense,weather,injury,just didnt bring it that day bla bla.
its not easier either way. You are either right or wrong.He will or he wont.
I'm not leaving any doubt. The Patriots will not make it to the SB.

Otis Driftwood · Post #227 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:35 am

I'll go ahead and say the Patriots will make the Super Bowl.

Why the eff not? Makes more sense than saying the Colts will.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #228 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:35 am

Otis Driftwood wrote:The Village Idiot of Real GM.

Can't make it up

I dont remember insulting you.
You are an adult older than 50,yes?
different views obviously frighten you and you need to insult people to feel superior.
You might want to rethink your approach.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #229 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:36 am

Otis Driftwood wrote:I'll go ahead and say the Patriots will make the Super Bowl.

Why the eff not? Makes more sense than saying the Colts will.

there,there,that didnt hurt one bit,did it?

of course it didnt. Good on you!

Otis Driftwood · Post #230 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:37 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:The Village Idiot of Real GM.

Can't make it up

I dont remember insulting you.
You are an adult older than 50,yes?
different views obviously frighten you and you need to insult people to feel superior.
You might want to rethink your approach.

That wasn't an insult. That was a factual observation.

Post #231 » by **Cactus Jack** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:48 am

Otis Driftwood wrote:I'll go ahead and say the Patriots will make the Super Bowl.

Ditto.

Post #232 » by **bleu** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:58 am

What in the hell? Stupidest fumble I've ever seen.

Otis Driftwood · Post #233 » by **Otis Driftwood** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:04 am

I recorded the 2nd half and OT last night. I don't think I'll find it necessary tonight.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #234 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:18 am

bleu wrote:What in the hell? Stupidest fumble I've ever seen.

you mean the forward pass?

its a fumble because the defense picked it up?

Post #235 » by **bleu** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:19 am

ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
bleu wrote:What in the hell? Stupidest fumble I've ever seen.

you mean the forward pass?

its a fumble because the defense picked it up?

It's a fumble because the ball came lose in his hand before he threw it. The call was correct. The fumble itself was stupid as hell.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #236 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:21 am

Otis Driftwood wrote:
ErnieDiGregorio wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:The Village Idiot of Real GM.

Can't make it up

I dont remember insulting you.
You are an adult older than 50,yes?
different views obviously frighten you and you need to insult people to feel superior.
You might want to rethink your approach.

That wasn't an insult. That was a factual observation.

your wife is smarter than you even though she watches Oprah.

NaturalBuns · Post #237 » by **NaturalBuns** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:40 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
NaturalBuns wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:More like an amazing defensive performance & outstanding special teams play! The Wagner leap was totally a legal play btw. It's only a penalty if the jumper lands onto the lineman in that scenario. So Arians was wrong on that as well.

Arizona had a amazing defensive preformance not Seattle... They let one get away Seattle had 2 first downs to cardinals 15 mid 3rd.

Had almost 500 yards offense. But besides the numbers cardinals had about 6-7 scoring drives last night all stalled by special teams or coaching.

Both teams put up a great defensive performance. But, I find it comical that you argue the Hawks effort wasn't. You had the dang ball for 46 bleeping minutes & yet you only put up 6 points. I'm sorry, but that's pretty impressive by my standards. Might be the most impressive defensive performance I've seen by this team. I don't blame the defense for giving up 400 yards or whatever it was, when it was made to go back out onto the field so often. By the end of OT they were drained, it was evident. Yet they still held David Johnson out of the endzone & put the onus on the kicker.

The only thing comical is we tied off special teams not because of your defense.

No way around it.

Post #238 » by **bleu** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:46 am

NaturalBuns wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
NaturalBuns wrote:
Arizona had a amazing defensive preformance not Seattle... They let one get away Seattle had 2 first downs to cardinals 15 mid 3rd.

Had almost 500 yards offense. But besides the numbers cardinals had about 6-7 scoring drives last night all stalled by special teams or coaching.

Both teams put up a great defensive performance. But, I find it comical that you argue the Hawks effort wasn't. You had the dang ball for 46 bleeping minutes & yet you only put up 6 points. I'm sorry, but that's pretty impressive by my standards. Might be the most impressive defensive performance I've seen by this team. I don't blame the defense for giving up 400 yards or whatever it was, when it was made to go back out onto the field so often. By the end of OT they were drained, it was evident. Yet they still held David Johnson out of the endzone & put the onus on the kicker.

The only thing comical is we tied off special teams not because of your defense.

No way around it.

I mean, Seattle defense DID hold y'all to 6 points though... :-?

NaturalBuns · Post #239 » by **NaturalBuns** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:52 am

Blocked FG, Blocked punt, missed FG.

They held but off special team mistakes.

ErnieDiGregorio · Post #240 » by **ErnieDiGregorio** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 4:12 am

NaturalBuns