Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase

Moderator: bwgood77

Arteezy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 998
And1: 1,424
Joined: Apr 12, 2018

Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#1 » by Arteezy » Tue Oct 6, 2020 1:38 am

Shaved Matt Patricia .
Arteezy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 998
And1: 1,424
Joined: Apr 12, 2018

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#2 » by Arteezy » Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:15 pm

BUMP
ropjhk
RealGM
Posts: 19,345
And1: 12,454
Joined: Jul 09, 2002
     

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#3 » by ropjhk » Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:19 pm

The legend of Tom Brady is taking another step yet again this season. The Patriots are in shambles without him and the Bucs are potential Superbowl contenders.

How much does Belichick owe Brady for his career success?
User avatar
iLLmatic860
General Manager
Posts: 9,896
And1: 16,386
Joined: Jan 23, 2013
Location: Tampa
     

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#4 » by iLLmatic860 » Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:31 pm

Why didnt Patriots Go all in on Brady is my question They were tryna play chess and ended up failing miserably. Lol

Funny I move to Tampa and Bucs are suddenly Superbowl contenders. Hard not to root for Bucs that team is fun
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 97,974
And1: 60,910
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#5 » by bwgood77 » Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:50 pm

Worse than Adam Gase with backups? I imagine you mean with his starter. I bet all coaches are bad with backups....most really bad since the median record of teams even with starters, is 500.
When asked how Fascism starts, Bertrand Russell once said:
"First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent."
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,975
And1: 10,351
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#6 » by HMFFL » Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:32 pm

DaT WaVeY RiCaN wrote:Why didnt Patriots Go all in on Brady is my question They were tryna play chess and ended up failing miserably. Lol

Funny I move to Tampa and Bucs are suddenly Superbowl contenders. Hard not to root for Bucs that team is fun
I agree.
Tom gave them a discounted rate for multiple years and when he finally wants what he deserves New England played games.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,975
And1: 10,351
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#7 » by HMFFL » Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:33 pm

ropjhk wrote:The legend of Tom Brady is taking another step yet again this season. The Patriots are in shambles without him and the Bucs are potential Superbowl contenders.

How much does Belichick owe Brady for his career success?
His leadership and IQ for the game show. He may have his angry moments on the sidelines but Tampa's players took notice. The offensive line is playing much better ever since the Chicago game.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RaoulDuke79
RealGM
Posts: 11,898
And1: 5,141
Joined: Jul 31, 2006
Location: purchasing stunning amounts of pudding.

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#8 » by RaoulDuke79 » Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:16 am

It won't happen because NE isn't going that far this year, but how cool would it be to see a TB vs NE Super Bowl?

Wouldn't that be the first time a starting QB from one Super Bowl team has gone on to play in another Super Bowl against their former team?

I mean, I know we've seen guys like Peyton and Warner get there with two different teams...anyways, that would be interesting to see.
We watched the tragedy unfold. We did as we were told, we bought and sold. It was the greatest show on Earth...but then it was over.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#9 » by Jedzz » Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:26 am

DaT WaVeY RiCaN wrote:Why didnt Patriots Go all in on Brady is my question They were tryna play chess and ended up failing miserably. Lol

Funny I move to Tampa and Bucs are suddenly Superbowl contenders. Hard not to root for Bucs that team is fun


They should have rode with him till he keeled over.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#10 » by Jedzz » Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:29 am

HMFFL wrote:
ropjhk wrote:The legend of Tom Brady is taking another step yet again this season. The Patriots are in shambles without him and the Bucs are potential Superbowl contenders.

How much does Belichick owe Brady for his career success?
His leadership and IQ for the game show. He may have his angry moments on the sidelines but Tampa's players took notice. The offensive line is playing much better ever since the Chicago game.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app


Until they run into a good defense again. Likely in playoffs.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,480
And1: 16,065
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase 

Post#11 » by therealbig3 » Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:15 pm

bwgood77 wrote:Worse than Adam Gase with backups? I imagine you mean with his starter. I bet all coaches are bad with backups....most really bad since the median record of teams even with starters, is 500.


Kosar and Testaverde were long-time starters in the league and were Pro-Bowlers. Bledsoe was a Pro-Bowler before and after Belichick and was a really good starter for a long time. Cam Newton is a starter and a former MVP. Matt Cassell was a starter and a Pro-Bowler.

His combined record with all of them is 42-51, not including this year with Cam, although it's looking like another losing season for sure. And those are much better QBs than what Gase has had tbh. Tannehill, Cutler, and Darnold? Yuck.

Return to The General NFL Board