Page 1 of 1
Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Tue Oct 6, 2020 1:38 am
by Arteezy
Shaved Matt Patricia .
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:15 pm
by Arteezy
BUMP
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:19 pm
by ropjhk
The legend of Tom Brady is taking another step yet again this season. The Patriots are in shambles without him and the Bucs are potential Superbowl contenders.
How much does Belichick owe Brady for his career success?
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:31 pm
by iLLmatic860
Why didnt Patriots Go all in on Brady is my question They were tryna play chess and ended up failing miserably. Lol
Funny I move to Tampa and Bucs are suddenly Superbowl contenders. Hard not to root for Bucs that team is fun
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:50 pm
by bwgood77
Worse than Adam Gase with backups? I imagine you mean with his starter. I bet all coaches are bad with backups....most really bad since the median record of teams even with starters, is 500.
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:32 pm
by HMFFL
DaT WaVeY RiCaN wrote:Why didnt Patriots Go all in on Brady is my question They were tryna play chess and ended up failing miserably. Lol
Funny I move to Tampa and Bucs are suddenly Superbowl contenders. Hard not to root for Bucs that team is fun
I agree.
Tom gave them a discounted rate for multiple years and when he finally wants what he deserves New England played games.
Sent from my SM-N975U using
RealGM mobile app
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:33 pm
by HMFFL
ropjhk wrote:The legend of Tom Brady is taking another step yet again this season. The Patriots are in shambles without him and the Bucs are potential Superbowl contenders.
How much does Belichick owe Brady for his career success?
His leadership and IQ for the game show. He may have his angry moments on the sidelines but Tampa's players took notice. The offensive line is playing much better ever since the Chicago game.
Sent from my SM-N975U using
RealGM mobile app
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:16 am
by RaoulDuke79
It won't happen because NE isn't going that far this year, but how cool would it be to see a TB vs NE Super Bowl?
Wouldn't that be the first time a starting QB from one Super Bowl team has gone on to play in another Super Bowl against their former team?
I mean, I know we've seen guys like Peyton and Warner get there with two different teams...anyways, that would be interesting to see.
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:26 am
by Jedzz
DaT WaVeY RiCaN wrote:Why didnt Patriots Go all in on Brady is my question They were tryna play chess and ended up failing miserably. Lol
Funny I move to Tampa and Bucs are suddenly Superbowl contenders. Hard not to root for Bucs that team is fun
They should have rode with him till he keeled over.
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:29 am
by Jedzz
HMFFL wrote:ropjhk wrote:The legend of Tom Brady is taking another step yet again this season. The Patriots are in shambles without him and the Bucs are potential Superbowl contenders.
How much does Belichick owe Brady for his career success?
His leadership and IQ for the game show. He may have his angry moments on the sidelines but Tampa's players took notice. The offensive line is playing much better ever since the Chicago game.
Sent from my SM-N975U using
RealGM mobile app
Until they run into a good defense again. Likely in playoffs.
Re: Bill Belichick is 51-65 all time without Tom Brady, worse winning % than Adam Gase
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:15 pm
by therealbig3
bwgood77 wrote:Worse than Adam Gase with backups? I imagine you mean with his starter. I bet all coaches are bad with backups....most really bad since the median record of teams even with starters, is 500.
Kosar and Testaverde were long-time starters in the league and were Pro-Bowlers. Bledsoe was a Pro-Bowler before and after Belichick and was a really good starter for a long time. Cam Newton is a starter and a former MVP. Matt Cassell was a starter and a Pro-Bowler.
His combined record with all of them is 42-51, not including this year with Cam, although it's looking like another losing season for sure. And those are much better QBs than what Gase has had tbh. Tannehill, Cutler, and Darnold? Yuck.