Draft Discussion

Moderator: bwgood77

User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 27,997
And1: 14,438
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#501 » by Cactus Jack » Sun May 1, 2022 12:26 am

RaoulDuke79 wrote:From a casual fan perspective who has not followed the game closely in quite a while and is not familiar with any of the players, it appears at first glance that the Texans had a pretty decent draft overall. Then again it is the Texans, so well...yea.

Any thoughts from you guys who are way more in tune with the current game on some of the players they selected?

Looks like they made some good additions to the secondary/LB and the OL/RB/WR, but what the hell do I know anymore. I'm just glad we're no longer under Ass Chin's grip.

If healthy, Stingley will be very good. Stephon Gilmore is his best comp.

I'm not in love with Kenyon Green. But they upgraded the OL.

They got some good players on day 2. Pitre & Metchie are solid.

Dameon Pierce is one of my favorite RB's in this class. Kareem Hunt is the guy I think of when watching him.

Overall...I would have taken Ekwonu or Neal over Stingley. But I like what they did for the most part.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,667
And1: 19,009
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#502 » by Pharmcat » Sun May 1, 2022 12:56 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Let’s go Nakobe!!!

Eagles are cleaning up man! Bjj is in shambles. :wink:


Eagles A+++++ draft. They killed it. Same with ravens
Image
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 27,997
And1: 14,438
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#503 » by Cactus Jack » Sun May 1, 2022 2:08 am

Image
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,497
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#504 » by DrWood » Sun May 1, 2022 2:15 am

Pharmcat wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Let’s go Nakobe!!!

Eagles are cleaning up man! Bjj is in shambles. :wink:


Eagles A+++++ draft. They killed it. Same with ravens

How is the Eagles draft particularly good? They selected the BPA in the first round, and Nakobe Dean fell to them. What else did they do?
DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,497
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#505 » by DrWood » Sun May 1, 2022 2:18 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
Read on Twitter


Damn. We killed this draft!! This guy should have been taken on Day 2.

No, because a CB has to do more than be tall and run fast; Woolen is a developmental guy. Might be a great pick. Might not.
He was a 4th round pick.
DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,497
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#506 » by DrWood » Sun May 1, 2022 2:21 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Hurts is arguably the best QB in the division and finally has weapons at receiver.

Hurts time is limited.

Read on Twitter

It's too bad that Strong has his medical problems. He would have been a day two pick if he was clean.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 27,997
And1: 14,438
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#507 » by Cactus Jack » Sun May 1, 2022 2:21 am

DrWood wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Read on Twitter


Damn. We killed this draft!! This guy should have been taken on Day 2.

No, because a CB has to do more than be tall and run fast; Woolen is a developmental guy. Might be a great pick. Might not.
He was a 4th round pick.

You don't find CB's with those measurables. He's a converted receiver. Huge upside. A lot of people had him going in the 3rd round.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 27,997
And1: 14,438
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#508 » by Cactus Jack » Sun May 1, 2022 2:25 am

DrWood wrote:
Pharmcat wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Eagles are cleaning up man! Bjj is in shambles. :wink:


Eagles A+++++ draft. They killed it. Same with ravens

How is the Eagles draft particularly good? They selected the BPA in the first round, and Nakobe Dean fell to them. What else did they do?

I think a lot of the love is because of AJ Brown. Davis & Dean we're BPA. But you still have to give them credit for going that route & pulling off the trade. I'm a huge fan of Cam Jurgens also.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,497
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#509 » by DrWood » Sun May 1, 2022 2:30 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
DrWood wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Read on Twitter


Damn. We killed this draft!! This guy should have been taken on Day 2.

No, because a CB has to do more than be tall and run fast; Woolen is a developmental guy. Might be a great pick. Might not.
He was a 4th round pick.

You don't find CB's with those measurables. He's a converted receiver. Huge upside. A lot of people had him going in the 3rd round.

If so, a lot of people didn't know what they were talking about.
Pharmcat
RealGM
Posts: 56,667
And1: 19,009
Joined: Oct 05, 2002

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#510 » by Pharmcat » Sun May 1, 2022 8:37 am

DrWood wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:Hurts is arguably the best QB in the division and finally has weapons at receiver.

Hurts time is limited.

Read on Twitter

It's too bad that Strong has his medical problems. He would have been a day two pick if he was clean.


He would’ve been #1 qb if he was healthy. But his mobility is shot due to the knee.
Image
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 93,303
And1: 24,566
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#511 » by hermes » Sun May 1, 2022 1:51 pm

DrWood wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
DrWood wrote:No, because a CB has to do more than be tall and run fast; Woolen is a developmental guy. Might be a great pick. Might not.
He was a 4th round pick.

You don't find CB's with those measurables. He's a converted receiver. Huge upside. A lot of people had him going in the 3rd round.

If so, a lot of people didn't know what they were talking about.

nfl draft conversations in a nutshell
okboomer
Pro Prospect
Posts: 976
And1: 752
Joined: May 28, 2021
Location: Stuck in the 2nd Round
 

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#512 » by okboomer » Sun May 1, 2022 4:05 pm

What an awesome draft for the Eagles. Granted none of them have played a nfl snap yet. Biggest draft for them in many years. Got two players off a legendary defense in Georgia. Plus traded for AJ Brown. Now just need Jameis to totally implode this season and could be looking at a top 10 pick :lol: .
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 27,997
And1: 14,438
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#513 » by Cactus Jack » Sun May 1, 2022 5:25 pm

Winners & losers?


The Ravens first 6 picks are great value. I'd say they won the draft.

Losers? Minnesota? Cine is a good player. But that trade down (12-32) was pretty brutal. I don't love how they used their draft capital if I'm being honest. Booth is fine. But the rest is fairly meh to me. Sorry Duke & Hermes. Maybe we'll all look like idiots. :wink:

Taking Cole Strange in the 1st. Makes New England an automatic loser in my book.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 93,303
And1: 24,566
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#514 » by hermes » Sun May 1, 2022 7:17 pm

kirk cousins and i are looking forward to serving everyone their crow 8-)
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 35,065
And1: 64,609
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#515 » by Duke4life831 » Sun May 1, 2022 8:25 pm

Hated the Vikings draft. Again if youre going to take a safety in the 1st, you take the safety that is basically unanimously viewed as a the best safety in the class by a wide margin. But if youre going to trade all the way down from 12 to 32, you better get a better return than what they got.

Like I said in the middle of the 1st, I wasn't a fan of Booth and they ended up grabbing him in the 2nd.

Dont know much about Ingram but seems like most think this was quite the reach.

Brian Asamoah is a tiny linebacker who isnt projected to be an every down backer.

Day 3 picks are mostly just shots in the dark.

So ya going into the summer not high at all with this draft. Hopefully they all prove me wrong and Ill gladly eat crow.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 59,815
And1: 15,523
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#516 » by Dr Positivity » Mon May 2, 2022 12:37 am

The man with the golden leg (sounds like he fell cause he can't do anything but kick it as far as he can but that's ok)

User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 27,997
And1: 14,438
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
   

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#517 » by Cactus Jack » Mon May 2, 2022 5:56 pm

Read on Twitter
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 16,411
And1: 3,282
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#518 » by bluejerseyjinx » Tue May 3, 2022 3:18 pm

Hated the Cowboys draft. Mess up bit time with their first pick. I'm ashamed after 52 years. At least there is Showtime and fantasy football to look forward to.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 17,174
And1: 4,190
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#519 » by LAKESHOW » Thu May 5, 2022 3:16 pm

It is clear to me, that the Patriots got Lucky Drafting the kid from California, Tom Brady. It is also clear to me, that Luck is the foundational Philosophy of their drafting process
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
bluejerseyjinx
RealGM
Posts: 16,411
And1: 3,282
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
Location: Maine
       

Re: Draft Discussion 

Post#520 » by bluejerseyjinx » Fri May 6, 2022 4:56 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:Winners & losers?


The Ravens first 6 picks are great value. I'd say they won the draft.

Losers? Minnesota? Cine is a good player. But that trade down (12-32) was pretty brutal. I don't love how they used their draft capital if I'm being honest. Booth is fine. But the rest is fairly meh to me. Sorry Duke & Hermes. Maybe we'll all look like idiots. :wink:

Taking Cole Strange in the 1st. Makes New England an automatic loser.

I agree about the Vikings. They used their draft capital horribly. I also thought the Cowboys had a horrible draft along with the Patriots. I also add the Bears in there. they didn't address their O-line at all and do anything to protect their Qb they drafted last year.
On the other hand the Chiefs did an outstanding job with their draft capital and more than deserve an A+. I also loved what the Sea Hawks did. Love Cross!!! I probably should send you a PM. I hate getting mushy about your team in front of the kids. :wink:

Return to The General NFL Board