Peter King ranks the QB's
Moderator: bwgood77
Peter King ranks the QB's
- Next Coming
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,956
- And1: 1,625
- Joined: Aug 17, 2004
- Location: War Room
Peter King ranks the QB's
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/w ... qbs/1.html
Enjoy boys and be nice.
Ah the heck with it. Let's start the griping and moaning.
Enjoy boys and be nice.
Ah the heck with it. Let's start the griping and moaning.
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
He tried being objective, which is something of a start for King
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
Actually the whole intangible nonsense didn
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,427
- And1: 2
- Joined: May 24, 2002
It's not that i'm throwing out intangibles as a factor completely, it's that it looks a little bizarre throwing an on the fly rating system on a chart where everything else is a concrete metric. It's sort of like when we make up funny names for fake "clutch" and "grittiness" stats on the MLB boards. Intangibles have their name for a reason.
- treiz
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,984
- And1: 564
- Joined: Aug 17, 2005
- Location: London, England
The_Child_Prodigy wrote:Bulger at 5 is pretty accurate although he was second or third(cant remember) in passing yards and had a 3-1 rd-int rate. He played with a O-Line that was unrecognizable from the first day to the last. I still say hes just as good as Brees
Didn't Bulger start the year with like 12 TD and 0 INTs?
EDIT: LOL @ Vince Young at #7...and how Schaub, Leinart is higher than Trent Green, Vick, Eli Manning and Losman
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,011
- And1: 18,086
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,011
- And1: 18,086
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
The_Child_Prodigy wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
umm brees has 12 more tds and more passing yards but Brees has also thrown 9 more ints. Bulger has been more consistent too.
If by more consistent you mean more passes and less completions, than I completely agree.
Brees was still recovering in the first few games of this season. I remember he tried to go deep against Green Bay and it just kind of floated, and was picked off, because his arm was still weak.
I'm talking about the Saint's Drew Brees by the way, it's not like had all types of weapons in SD anyway, sure he had LT and Gates, but no real good recievers.
Bulger is not a more consistent QB than Brees.
I don't know what to tell you if you think Bulger's year last year, was close to Brees'
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,011
- And1: 18,086
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
AIizdaking wrote:McNabb below Tony Romo, Vince Young, and Cutler? Wow..
Vick is way WAY too low
Mcnabb should be right behind Palmer if you ask me....
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
- The_Child_Prodigy
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,396
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 03, 2005
NO-KG-AI wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
If by more consistent you mean more passes and less completions, than I completely agree.
Brees was still recovering in the first few games of this season. I remember he tried to go deep against Green Bay and it just kind of floated, and was picked off, because his arm was still weak.
I'm talking about the Saint's Drew Brees by the way, it's not like had all types of weapons in SD anyway, sure he had LT and Gates, but no real good recievers.
Bulger is not a more consistent QB than Brees.
I don't know what to tell you if you think Bulger's year last year, was close to Brees'
brees had more pass yards and more tds but bulger played more steady and played safe consistent football. Bulger has done it longer too... i mean the charges drafted rivers to replace brees..... Last year brees was good but bulger wasnt as good but can be as good or better.
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,011
- And1: 18,086
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
How is 62% with a better recieving core, more consistent??
What's the excuse for the Rams not being as good as the Saints??
You think it was an accident that we had the #1 passing offense???
I dunno, the weapons around Bulger seem to be at least equal, considering all of our injuries at receiver......
What's the excuse for the Rams not being as good as the Saints??
You think it was an accident that we had the #1 passing offense???
I dunno, the weapons around Bulger seem to be at least equal, considering all of our injuries at receiver......
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
- The_Child_Prodigy
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,396
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 03, 2005
NO-KG-AI wrote:How is 62% with a better recieving core, more consistent??
What's the excuse for the Rams not being as good as the Saints??
You think it was an accident that we had the #1 passing offense???
I dunno, the weapons around Bulger seem to be at least equal, considering all of our injuries at receiver......
Injuries??? Holt played most of the season injured and if was healthy could have been way more dominnt. Pace was injured half the season. A 7th round rookie who although performed well played out of position, we lost our centre in week one and we had like 7 different lineman from the first week to the last.
Funny about injuries..... Bulger threw less picks but less TDs. We could have just as easily had a 10-6 record like you. BUlger has done it longer also.
Return to The General NFL Board