Leftwich Agrees To Terms With Leftwich

El Turco · Post #1 » by **El Turco** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:15 pm

http://www.realgmfootball.com/src_wiret ... _leftwich/

I think this is the second time wiretap did this. Anyway, i called it few weeks back in the leftwich thread. He cant be worse than harrington.

Post #2 » by **J.Kim** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:24 pm

I think just about everyone called this after Leftwich was released.

Good signing by the Falcons though. From what I've seen, even though he's quite possibly one of the slowest QB's alive, he's still a better option than Harrington by miles.

Wizards2Lottery · Post #3 » by **Wizards2Lottery** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:25 pm

The Bears should have signed him.

Post #4 » by **LLcoleJ** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:31 pm

You have to love yourself before you can be loved.

on a serious note: good pick up by ATL though. He is the anit-Vick because he is not mobile at all.. but he is an upgrade over Harrington.

oh they wish they still had Shaub..

A.J. · Post #5 » by **A.J.** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:45 pm

your title is wrong.

good signing by the us. (2nd favorite team)

Post #6 » by **dms269** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:47 pm

Phil_2.0 wrote:oh they wish they still had Shaub..

With Schaub the o-line would have been even worse.

High 5 · Post #7 » by **High 5** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:04 pm

uga_dawgs24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

With Schaub the o-line would have been even worse.

I don't believe so. Harrington is responsible for at least half of the sacks if not more. He's holding on to the ball for far too long. At least Leftwich doesn't play scared. I think he's too slow and injury prone to do much behind our OL, though.

We'll see, though. I think everyone expected this to happen as soon as he was cut. Surprised it took this long.

FakeScreenName123 · Post #8 » by **FakeScreenName123** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:32 pm

I love the title,

"Leftwich agrees to terms with leftwich".

Its great that he's found himself.

Post #9 » by **dms269** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:33 pm

High 5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I don't believe so. Harrington is responsible for at least half of the sacks if not more. He's holding on to the ball for far too long. At least Leftwich doesn't play scared. I think he's too slow and injury prone to do much behind our OL, though.

We'll see, though. I think everyone expected this to happen as soon as he was cut. Surprised it took this long.

I didn't say Schaub would be worse, I said the line would be worse due to us not having Blalock.

Post #10 » by **CBS7** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:11 pm

Gilbert0Arenas wrote:The Bears should have signed him.

I wish..

Post #11 » by **gswhoops** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:33 pm

Nice thread title.

NH_soxfan14 · Post #12 » by **NH_soxfan14** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:38 pm

Very good signing for the Falcons. Sweet thread title

Post #13 » by **CBS7** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 12:16 am

The thread title is intentional.

NoSkyy · Post #14 » by **NoSkyy** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:34 am

Goes right with Culpepper signs Culpepper.

QBs these days...

Monkeyfeng06 · Post #15 » by **Monkeyfeng06** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:16 am

sounds like leftwich is writing a book.

Abraham Lincoln · Post #16 » by **Abraham Lincoln** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:42 am

Bears blew it. Looks like they want a terrible QB forever.

If they only had a decent QB, they'd have a shot at a Super Bowl. In the weak NFC, they can return there but Grossman isn't leading them anywhere.

Good signing for Atlanta but they aren't going anywhere anyway.

travis minor · Post #17 » by **travis minor** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:12 am

Leftwich Agrees To Terms With Leftwich

SpeedyG · Post #18 » by **SpeedyG** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:34 pm

Abraham Lincoln wrote:Bears blew it. Looks like they want a terrible QB forever.

If they only had a decent QB, they'd have a shot at a Super Bowl. In the weak NFC, they can return there but Grossman isn't leading them anywhere.

Good signing for Atlanta but they aren't going anywhere anyway.

Chicago would have won that SB if they had a halfway decent QB other than Gross-man.