NFL Fines Brady for being "Too Good"

Moderator: bwgood77

magicfan4life05
RealGM
Posts: 23,617
And1: 198
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !

NFL Fines Brady for being "Too Good" 

Post#1 » by magicfan4life05 » Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:42 pm

What a cheater!!

j/k

When it comes to the NFL's uniform police, no one is above the law. The Boston Globe reported New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady has been fined for not having his chin strap properly buckled.

Reiss reports that Brady's agent, Don Yee, confirmed the fine but would not say how much Brady was fined or which game the violation occurred in.

This isn't the first such fine for the Patriots this season; defensive lineman Ty Warren was fined $7,500 for not having his chin strap buckled in a Sept. 23 game against the Bills. NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said teams were notified before the season and reminded multiple times that the league would be cracking down on unbuckled chin straps as an effort to prevent concussions.


http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post ... =nfl,49465
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:

"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#2 » by J.Kim » Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:59 pm

This isn't the first such fine for the Patriots this season; defensive lineman Ty Warren was fined $7,500 for not having his chin strap buckled in a Sept. 23 game against the Bills. NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said teams were notified before the season and reminded multiple times that the league would be cracking down on unbuckled chin straps as an effort to prevent concussions.


And still nothing on making Riddell Revolution helmets mandatory?

The NFL is awesome, just teeming with hypocrisies.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

 

Post#3 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:55 am

J.Kim wrote:
This isn't the first such fine for the Patriots this season; defensive lineman Ty Warren was fined $7,500 for not having his chin strap buckled in a Sept. 23 game against the Bills. NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said teams were notified before the season and reminded multiple times that the league would be cracking down on unbuckled chin straps as an effort to prevent concussions.


And still nothing on making Riddell Revolution helmets mandatory?

The NFL is awesome, just teeming with hypocrisies.


Well im sure hed get to it but crowd noise is obviously a much more important issue than preventing the players from getting concussions that can cause a lifetime of misery for the player injured.
Yi Jian Lian
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 18, 2007

 

Post#4 » by Yi Jian Lian » Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:18 am

He deserves it.

Just kidding.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,287
And1: 12,141
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

 

Post#5 » by Worm Guts » Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:51 pm

J.Kim wrote:
This isn't the first such fine for the Patriots this season; defensive lineman Ty Warren was fined $7,500 for not having his chin strap buckled in a Sept. 23 game against the Bills. NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said teams were notified before the season and reminded multiple times that the league would be cracking down on unbuckled chin straps as an effort to prevent concussions.


And still nothing on making Riddell Revolution helmets mandatory?

The NFL is awesome, just teeming with hypocrisies.


I really don't see how the two situations are related.
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#6 » by J.Kim » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:12 pm

Worm Guts wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I really don't see how the two situations are related.


Riddell Revolution helmets are scientifically proven to reduce the concussion rate in football players.

http://newsblaze.com/story/200601090600 ... story.html
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,287
And1: 12,141
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

 

Post#7 » by Worm Guts » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:27 pm

J.Kim wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Riddell Revolution helmets are scientifically proven to reduce the concussion rate in football players.

http://newsblaze.com/story/200601090600 ... story.html


I still don't see how they're related. Because the NFL is slow on accepting a new technology, they can't enforce their uniform policy?
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#8 » by J.Kim » Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:14 pm

Worm Guts wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I still don't see how they're related. Because the NFL is slow on accepting a new technology, they can't enforce their uniform policy?


It's not so much the enforcing the uniform policy part, but rather the hypocrisy here, in which they're increasing efforts to prevent concussions and yet have not mandated the Ridell Revolution throughout the league.

It's been scientifically proven, and has been mandated all throughout the High School levels, so why hasn't the NFL mandated this yet?
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,287
And1: 12,141
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

 

Post#9 » by Worm Guts » Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:55 pm

So if the NFL doesn't use the Riddell helmet, anything they do to reduce concussions makes them hypocrites?
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#10 » by J.Kim » Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:16 pm

Worm Guts wrote:So if the NFL doesn't use the Riddell helmet, anything they do to reduce concussions makes them hypocrites?


It's not so much the "anything else" part, but rather the "effort to prevent concussions" part that I have a problem with.

Edit: As in, I'm fine and dandy if the NFL tries to make sure that every player has his chin strap buckled in order to prevent concussions. But I'm not fine and dandy if the NFL goes around touting that they're trying to crack down on concussions while not mandating the Riddell Revolution.

Perhaps "Hypocrisy" is too strong of a word.
User avatar
l2RDO
Junior
Posts: 484
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2007

 

Post#11 » by l2RDO » Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:39 am

J.Kim wrote:Perhaps "Hypocrisy" is too strong of a word.


No, hypocrisy is definitely the right word. This isnt about protecting players and preventing concussions, its about fining players so that they can make more money.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

 

Post#12 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:51 am

J.Kim wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Riddell Revolution helmets are scientifically proven to reduce the concussion rate in football players.

http://newsblaze.com/story/200601090600 ... story.html


Then the players should voluntarily wear them. But I don't see why it should be mandatory.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#13 » by J.Kim » Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:56 am

TheOUTLAW wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Then the players should voluntarily wear them. But I don't see why it should be mandatory.


My original point was pointing out the hypocrisy (or any other word that accurately fits this description) of the league "trying to crack down on concussions" and yet, not mandating the Riddell helmet.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

 

Post#14 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:59 am

My only problem with it is that it appears that Riddell is the only producer of this helmet. Sure there are other instances where leagues give producers a monopoly position, but I'm not sure that helmets should be one of them. But, as a player I'd definitely want the helmet that best protects the dome. And, I'm almost positive that they have an option as to which they wear.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#15 » by J.Kim » Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:02 am

TheOUTLAW wrote:My only problem with it is that it appears that Riddell is the only producer of this helmet. Sure there are other instances where leagues give producers a monopoly position, but I'm not sure that helmets should be one of them. But, as a player I'd definitely want the helmet that best protects the dome. And, I'm almost positive that they have an option as to which they wear.


Why not? How much different is it than giving Reebok basically all rights over apparel?
I mean, as long as it protects the players' heads better than other helmets out there, why should it matter?

And as far as other options, I haven't seen one yet. But if there are, the league should mandate both and give a choice to the players.
skitch815
Starter
Posts: 2,496
And1: 59
Joined: Oct 19, 2005
     

 

Post#16 » by skitch815 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:12 am

l2RDO wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



No, hypocrisy is definitely the right word. This isnt about protecting players and preventing concussions, its about fining players so that they can make more money.


Doesn't the money paid for fines go to an NFL related charity?
Ex-hippie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,213
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2003

 

Post#17 » by Ex-hippie » Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:39 pm

l2RDO wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



No, hypocrisy is definitely the right word. This isnt about protecting players and preventing concussions, its about fining players so that they can make more money.


Right, 'cause if you add up all the fines for uniform violations over the course of the season, it might be able to buy... well, maybe it could pay a third of the salary of a practice squad punter or something. But add it up over the next 100 or 150 years and we're talking about some seriously swelling coffers!
Ex-hippie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,213
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2003

 

Post#18 » by Ex-hippie » Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:40 pm

skitch815 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Doesn't the money paid for fines go to an NFL related charity?


Oh yeah. That too.

Return to The General NFL Board