A year later, was Mario Wiliams the right # 1 pick?

Moderator: bwgood77

Post Reply
DaGoodz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,186
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 14, 2004
Location: RAWRRRR

A year later, was Mario Wiliams the right # 1 pick? 

Post#1 » by DaGoodz » Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:56 pm

I think its clear as day right now that the Texans Management was smarter than a lot of people gave them credit for. Mario Williams has 9.5 sacks right now and is causing havoc looking like a franchise DE.
While Reggie Bush and Vince Young are both struggling right now and there are a lot of questions bout their future and don't look like franchise picks.
Top
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#2 » by Basketball Jesus » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:39 pm

It was as right then as it is now. I
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
Top
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#3 » by J.Kim » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:43 pm

Let's give it one more year before we come to a conclusion.

Rookies = 3 Years to pan out.

But, yes, I think the Texans made a good pick back then, and I still think it's a good pick now.
Top
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 106,694
And1: 41,295
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:
Contact ReasonablySober

 

Post#4 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:56 pm

It appears that it was. I thought Bush would be an impact runner in the NFL and that hasn't been the case.
Top
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,804
And1: 10,245
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

 

Post#5 » by HMFFL » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:04 pm

I'm a firm believer of defense first! I told many people they made a very good decision, but they choose to look past the marketing side of things, and that's about the only mistake they made.
Top
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 17,985
And1: 4,455
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

 

Post#6 » by LAKESHOW » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:40 pm

WRONG!

the first choice always goes to ...QB!

they made a mistake, because QB is always the first choice.

the team falls and rises with the play of the QB. the QB is the focal point. the QB is the franchise. and when the QB comes from houston, he sells tickets.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
Top
User avatar
livestrong4ever
General Manager
Posts: 9,099
And1: 145
Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Location: Roaring down the river.
Contact:
Contact livestrong4ever
     

 

Post#7 » by livestrong4ever » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:40 pm

lol no. Reggie Bush , Vince Young, Matt Lineart will be stars in this league . Even if Williams averages 12 sacks a year I still would not take him over those three guys.
Top
User avatar
brewcityboii
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
Location: BRETT FAVRE >> Any other QB in NFL History!!!

 

Post#8 » by brewcityboii » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:52 pm

livestrong4ever wrote:lol no. Reggie Bush , Vince Young, Matt Lineart will be stars in this league . Even if Williams averages 12 sacks a year I still would not take him over those three guys.


Matt Lineart a Star in the League...that's a joke right.
Reggie Bush will only be a star in the media and jersey sales not on the field.
VY the Jury is still out on him.
Top
DaGoodz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,186
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 14, 2004
Location: RAWRRRR

 

Post#9 » by DaGoodz » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:58 pm

LAKESHOW wrote:WRONG!

the first choice always goes to ...QB!

they made a mistake, because QB is always the first choice.

the team falls and rises with the play of the QB. the QB is the focal point. the QB is the franchise. and when the QB comes from houston, he sells tickets.


Well they traded for a QB in Matt Schaub(SP?) the year after. You don't draft a QB just to sell tickets, you draft a QB to win games. I don't think Vince Young or Matt Lineart will be better than Matt Schaub. They both played close to being benched this year, well Lineart was benched temporarily.
Top
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#10 » by J.Kim » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:01 pm

DaGoodz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Well they traded for a QB in Matt Schaub(SP?) the year after. You don't draft a QB just to sell tickets, you draft a QB to win games. I don't think Vince Young or Matt Lineart will be better than Matt Schaub. They both played close to being benched this year, well Lineart was benched temporarily.


Vince Young? When was this?
Top
User avatar
JaxMagic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 5,446
And1: 325
Joined: Apr 11, 2003
   

 

Post#11 » by JaxMagic » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:04 pm

LAKESHOW wrote:WRONG!

the first choice always goes to ...QB!

they made a mistake, because QB is always the first choice.

the team falls and rises with the play of the QB. the QB is the focal point. the QB is the franchise. and when the QB comes from houston, he sells tickets.


Yeah, I am going to have to disagree with your here. I believe that building a good football team starts up front in the trenches; basically building your team from the inside out. Having a great O-line makes everyone's life easier, just put Brady behind Miami's line and watch what happens.
Top
User avatar
Rooster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,140
And1: 11
Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Location: Frozen Wasteland

 

Post#12 » by Rooster » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:07 pm

As mentioned, build from the trenches. Solid veteran QBs can be found on the free agent market but a good pass-rushing DE is (nearly) priceless.
Schadenfreude wrote:Not going to lie, if I found out that one of the seemingly illiterate morons we'd banned on the Raptors board was Primoz Brezec, it'd pretty much make my decade.
Top
cb4_89
RealGM
Posts: 27,650
And1: 517
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
       

 

Post#13 » by cb4_89 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:43 pm

it should have been bush if he wasn't so ****. Time for sal to come and defend bush even though he gets like 40 yards a game.
Top
cb4_89
RealGM
Posts: 27,650
And1: 517
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
       

 

Post#14 » by cb4_89 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:45 pm

btw i still think bush will turn out to be very good. Like 1100 rushing yard and 800 receving yard good.
Top
User avatar
livestrong4ever
General Manager
Posts: 9,099
And1: 145
Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Location: Roaring down the river.
Contact:
Contact livestrong4ever
     

 

Post#15 » by livestrong4ever » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:46 pm

brewcityboii wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Matt Lineart a Star in the League...that's a joke right.
Reggie Bush will only be a star in the media and jersey sales not on the field.
VY the Jury is still out on him.


right :roll:

Matt Lineart a joke :roll:
Top
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

 

Post#16 » by studcrackers » Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:54 pm

LAKESHOW wrote:WRONG!

the first choice always goes to ...QB!

they made a mistake, because QB is always the first choice.

the team falls and rises with the play of the QB. the QB is the focal point. the QB is the franchise. and when the QB comes from houston, he sells tickets.


i disagree they shouldve traded the pick for norm chow i think we can all agree that wouldve been the smartest thing to do
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
Top
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#17 » by J.Kim » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:03 pm

studcrackers wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



i disagree they shouldve traded the pick for norm chow i think we can all agree that wouldve been the smartest thing to do


Nah,
First they should have lured Pete Carroll, then they should have picked Reggie Bush.
Then they should have traded Andre Johnson for Norm Chow. Then proceed to pick LenDale White in the 2nd round.
Top
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#18 » by deeney0 » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:09 pm

No one thinks a team with an offensive line made out of swiss cheese should have at least considered D'Brickashaw Ferguson?
Top
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#19 » by J.Kim » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:14 pm

deeney0 wrote:No one thinks a team with an offensive line made out of swiss cheese should have at least considered D'Brickashaw Ferguson?


Maybe I'm hearing wrong but, indications seem to be that D'Brickashaw is dissapointing in New York right now.
Top
User avatar
brewcityboii
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2007
Location: BRETT FAVRE >> Any other QB in NFL History!!!

 

Post#20 » by brewcityboii » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:14 pm

livestrong4ever wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



right :roll:

Matt Lineart a joke :roll:


You Update me when Matt Lienart has a pro bowl season.

The guy is to interested i Hollywood instead of the NFL.
Top
Post Reply

Return to The General NFL Board

 

 

More Football News »