How come Tanking Doesn't Affect NFL?

Moderator: bwgood77

magicfan4life05
RealGM
Posts: 23,617
And1: 198
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !

How come Tanking Doesn't Affect NFL? 

Post#1 » by magicfan4life05 » Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:22 pm

I was just wondering this because in the nba, even if you have the worst record, there is a lottery system that is supposed to deter tanking because it doesnt guarantee the top pick, but you see many teams tanking. But in the nfl, where the worst record absolutely guarantees the top pick, there is not much concern for tanking.

Granted I do not know much about the league, but if this assessment is true, what are the reasons for this? Is it because nfl players are more competitive and have more pride not to lose for the draft like nba players? (Huge generalization but that's all i can think of)
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:

"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

 

Post#2 » by Buck You » Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:47 pm

Non-guaranteed contracts could be one reason. The players are playing for their jobs.
Jasen777
General Manager
Posts: 7,599
And1: 2,361
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#3 » by Jasen777 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:27 am

The fact that there's only 16 games is a big reason. By the time you're out of it you can't really tank in catch anyone.

Also, the top couple of picks in the draft are normally much, much more valuable in basketball than football.
Harry10
Banned User
Posts: 8,784
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2002

 

Post#4 » by Harry10 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:23 am

football is more of a team sport, unlike in the NBA where if you can get a Duncan, Shaq, Lebron, etc you can make a push at the playoffs, reguardless of the other 11 guys.

but just because you get a Reggie Bush, or Vick, or LT, or Manning, you still need 4 or 5 quality players for a team to make a push into the playoffs.
Fatty
Head Coach
Posts: 7,495
And1: 11
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by Fatty » Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:21 am

pride
cb4_89
RealGM
Posts: 27,650
And1: 517
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
       

 

Post#6 » by cb4_89 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:29 am

the draft is such a crapshoot. Look at the last few first overall picks.

Russell
Mario Williams
Alex Smith
Eli Manning
Carson Palmer
David Carr
Vick
Courtney Brown
Tim Couch

How many of those do you think actually turned their franchises around?
User avatar
Flash3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 52,635
And1: 403
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Location: L-I-M-R

 

Post#7 » by Flash3 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:03 am

The guaranteed $$ you have to be the top picks in the NFL are just mind-boggling, could be one of the reasons.
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.
NDaATL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,836
And1: 622
Joined: Nov 08, 2004
Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
 

 

Post#8 » by NDaATL » Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:51 am

As someone else said, in basketball there are only 5 starters and one dominant player can turn a franchise into a title contender. In football there are 22 starters so the value of one player is much less.
User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

 

Post#9 » by Posey H8er » Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:30 pm

Fatty wrote:pride

QFT


Also, in the NFL draft, good players can be found in the early rounds, so unless you have a dominant 1-10 draft class, tanking most of the time will not make a significant difference, unlike the NBA.

You can find a DB in the 4th round whose just as good as a DB in the 1st round, and look how much cheaper he will be.
User avatar
Kid Vicious
Analyst
Posts: 3,740
And1: 478
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Location: West Coast

 

Post#10 » by Kid Vicious » Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:15 pm

Because the #1 pick could be a guy like Alex Smith, who is a complete bust, and no one is surprised.

The draft is a complete crap shoot, so positioning doesn't really matter. It's more about how many picks you have rather than where you are picking.
Harry10
Banned User
Posts: 8,784
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2002

 

Post#11 » by Harry10 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:56 pm

like i said eariler.... football is more of a team sport, but also, basketball scouts are just alot better.

nobody is surpised to see a 3rd rounder get the MVP, but in the NBA, it is shocking to see a 2nd rounder become an all-star.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#12 » by Basketball Jesus » Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:04 pm

Harry10 wrote:like i said eariler.... football is more of a team sport, but also, basketball scouts are just alot better.

nobody is surpised to see a 3rd rounder get the MVP, but in the NBA, it is shocking to see a 2nd rounder become an all-star.



And that
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
cb4_89
RealGM
Posts: 27,650
And1: 517
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
       

 

Post#13 » by cb4_89 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:13 pm

Also I would say that nfl owners don't support tanking. You lose a certain amount of games and you get fired. Simple as that. None of this Isiah Thomas ****.
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

 

Post#14 » by Dirty Water » Wed Jan 2, 2008 3:11 am

More players on the field and non guaranteed contracts are the two biggest factors, imo.
thierry
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,658
And1: 649
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

 

Post#15 » by thierry » Wed Jan 2, 2008 8:00 pm

Also something no one else has pointed out, it would be harder to intentionally lose a football game than a basketball game if you think about it. In basketball all you really have to do is fake a few injuries to your best players, everyone is happy in that situation. For football I don't really see how you can lose a game on purpose, although it looked like the Colts lost to the Titans on purpose the other night.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

 

Post#16 » by TheOUTLAW » Thu Jan 3, 2008 1:31 am

I think it's already been mentioned, but the main reason are that you don't have "LeBron" like players who are well about the ability of other players in the NFL. The top pick makes a ton of money with guaranteeds in the 10's of millions and the NFL draft is a huge crapshoot.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!

Return to The General NFL Board