Page 1 of 1

Mike Martz to 49'ers

Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 5:44 pm
by Monkeyfeng06
good hire? bad hire?

i'm just confused as to why he went there... 49'ers is the worst passing team in the league.. they don't have the talents to be a passing team... why mike martz?

Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:19 pm
by Jose7
They need to fire Alex Smith.

Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 6:47 pm
by Icness
Alex Smith is the antithesis of a Martz QB--he isn't accurate, lacks toughness, likes to run around, afraid to fling it into tight windows. I can't possibly imagine that marriage working out.

The primary reason Martz failed in Detroit was that the OL wasn't up to par. The Detroit OL is miles ahead of the SF OL, as currently constituted. There's not one WR in SF that would get PT ahead of Mike Furrey, the #4 WR in Detroit.

This has unmitigated disaster written all over it, short-term anyways. At least they'll be more fun to watch.

And not to go fantasy on y'all, but if you have Frank Gore in a keeper league, trade him now or suffer later!

Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 9:49 pm
by Basketball Jesus
That sound you hear is Vernon Davis' agent high-fiving anybody and everybody around him.

Assuming Martz inherits a receiving corps similar to the 2007 Niners, I wonder if you

Posted: Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:07 pm
by hermes
the offense should improve

need a new qb though

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:01 am
by Monkeyfeng06
vernon davis will probably have a great year next year but he needs to stop his stupid injuries. plus, there is no guarantee that he will get the ball cause 49'ers have no QB.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:08 am
by Icness
Basketball Jesus wrote:That sound you hear is Vernon Davis' agent high-fiving anybody and everybody around him.

Assuming Martz inherits a receiving corps similar to the 2007 Niners, I wonder if you

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:21 am
by treyZz
Since when is the TE used in a Martz offense anyway?

This may hurt Davis more than it helps.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:51 am
by GS Warriors 1
Icness wrote:Alex Smith is the antithesis of a Martz QB--he isn't accurate, lacks toughness, likes to run around, afraid to fling it into tight windows. I can't possibly imagine that marriage working out.


Shaun Hill would be the starting QB with what you just said. Then again, that says a whole lot about our Qb situation. You think Martz would want one of the mid-round QB's in the draft or a FA? I don't think there is anybody in FA. This should get fun.

The primary reason Martz failed in Detroit was that the OL wasn't up to par. The Detroit OL is miles ahead of the SF OL, as currently constituted. There's not one WR in SF that would get PT ahead of Mike Furrey, the #4 WR in Detroit.


I'll blame the left side of the line for their struggles. They had Adam Snyder, a backup, playing LT and Larry Allen looked like he was 50 years old. I think they target a LG in FA, move Staley to LT, and look into a RT in the draft. I thought David Baas did a nice job at RG.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:31 pm
by Basketball Jesus
I'm not picking on you, Tommy, but I wonder if all the hyperbole around Davis from certain places will cease when he once again:
misses three games with an injury that wouldn't sideline most middle-schoolers;
runs the wrong route or makes the wrong sight read on at least half the snaps;
plants his feet like an ancient statue when asked to run block;
gets pushed out of bounds by a pinkie thrust from a safety;
complains about not getting the ball in every freaking huddle. [/quote]

Oh, you definitely don