Dr. Z is NOT an Idiot???!!!

Moderator: bwgood77

User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

Dr. Z is NOT an Idiot???!!! 

Post#1 » by Basketball Jesus » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:40 pm

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/w ... l?bcnn=yes

Aside from calling Tynes and Gostkowski even, this is a pretty smart write-up but good ol' Dr. Zzzzzzzzz.

More imporantly and on topic: anybody notice how good his stuff has been this season? He's not as curmudgeonly as years past.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

 

Post#2 » by PR07 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:49 pm

I think he gushes about Justin Tuck a little too much, there's no doubt he's becoming a top playmaker, but the Giants best defensive player? Maybe most valuable.
JurassicJake
Banned User
Posts: 3,256
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 28, 2005

 

Post#3 » by JurassicJake » Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:26 pm

PacersRule07 wrote:I think he gushes about Justin Tuck a little too much, there's no doubt he's becoming a top playmaker, but the Giants best defensive player? Maybe most valuable.


Who would be better? I think he is a better pass-rusher than Osi, but and on the same level as Strahan. Tuck also can play DT, and do so very effectively. He also is a great run stuffer.
HCYanks
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,427
And1: 2
Joined: May 24, 2002

Re: Dr. Z is NOT an Idiot???!!! 

Post#4 » by HCYanks » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:05 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/dr_z/01/29/matchups.offense/index.html?bcnn=yes

Aside from calling Tynes and Gostkowski even, this is a pretty smart write-up but good ol' Dr. Zzzzzzzzz.

More imporantly and on topic: anybody notice how good his stuff has been this season? He's not as curmudgeonly as years past.


I stopped reading him altogether a year or two ago, but damn, when he actually puts together in-depth analysis it seems like he can still write something good.

I will say that he made his prediction a week ago based off of a "hunch", well before doing any analysis on the game. He loses points for that.
User avatar
UrbanLegendMD
General Manager
Posts: 8,716
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: Pilsen

 

Post#5 » by UrbanLegendMD » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:09 pm

I always read Dr.Z out of a habit and he's not bad, but when he goes on reminiscing about players past or talking punters, ZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
User avatar
Da Schwab
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,823
And1: 3,619
Joined: Apr 19, 2005
Location: Somewhere in the between.
Contact:
       

 

Post#6 » by Da Schwab » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:29 am

How could he take Booty McChin over Eli?
User avatar
wigglestrue
RealGM
Posts: 24,124
And1: 170
Joined: Feb 06, 2003
Location: Wiggling, after hitting a four-pointer of Truth

 

Post#7 » by wigglestrue » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:22 am

How does matching up offense vs. offense or defense vs. defense make any sense? Last time I checked, and forgive me if I'm wrong because I'm not a big football junkie, but last time I checked in football it's offense vs. defense and defense vs. offense. This ain't baseball, basketball, or hockey, or even soccer where the same player plays both sides of the ball.
0:01.8 A. Walker makes 3-pt shot from 28 ft (assist by E. Williams) +3 109-108
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9qvmXiEuU
User avatar
UrbanLegendMD
General Manager
Posts: 8,716
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: Pilsen

 

Post#8 » by UrbanLegendMD » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:34 am

wigglestrue wrote:How does matching up offense vs. offense or defense vs. defense make any sense? Last time I checked, and forgive me if I'm wrong because I'm not a big football junkie, but last time I checked in football it's offense vs. defense and defense vs. offense. This ain't baseball, basketball, or hockey, or even soccer where the same player plays both sides of the ball.


Because it's easier. Go player by player and compare them at each position. Defense vs Offense match ups are not as entertaining for an average reader.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
User avatar
UrbanLegendMD
General Manager
Posts: 8,716
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: Pilsen

 

Post#9 » by UrbanLegendMD » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:36 am

And Tuck over Seymour? Injuries slowed down Richard, but just a little while ago he was one of the best Ends in football. Is Tuck really better right now?
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
DaGoodz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,186
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 14, 2004
Location: RAWRRRR

 

Post#10 » by DaGoodz » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:40 pm

I do think Tuck gets overrated, he's like the third option on our DL.
He greatly benefits from Strahan and Osi.
But I hope he lives up to the hype Sunday, he better earn that contract extension
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#11 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:58 pm

NurbekIL wrote:And Tuck over Seymour? Injuries slowed down Richard, but just a little while ago he was one of the best Ends in football. Is Tuck really better right now?


Seymour was pretty bad out there this season. Not terrible, but for a player of his caliber, he was pretty bad.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
Posts: 14,176
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: Town

 

Post#12 » by FakeScreenName123 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:49 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Seymour was pretty bad out there this season. Not terrible, but for a player of his caliber, he was pretty bad.



hopefully next year he'll be alot better. you could tell that injury really messed up his explosiveness off the line. He still managed to bull rush past dudes though once in a while.
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#13 » by J.Kim » Fri Feb 1, 2008 3:52 pm

NurbekIL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Because it's easier. Go player by player and compare them at each position. Defense vs Offense match ups are not as entertaining for an average reader.


Entertaining for an average reader? How so...
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#14 » by Basketball Jesus » Fri Feb 1, 2008 4:46 pm

Because it
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,291
And1: 25,460
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#15 » by hermes » Fri Feb 1, 2008 10:50 pm

nice break down by Dr. Z
DaGoodz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,186
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 14, 2004
Location: RAWRRRR

 

Post#16 » by DaGoodz » Mon Feb 4, 2008 5:36 am

DaGoodz wrote:I do think Tuck gets overrated, he's like the third option on our DL.
He greatly benefits from Strahan and Osi.
But I hope he lives up to the hype Sunday, he better earn that contract extension


BEST DT IN THE LEAGUE
THE NEW PROTOTYPE
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#17 » by J.Kim » Mon Feb 4, 2008 7:17 am

DaGoodz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



BEST DT IN THE LEAGUE
THE NEW PROTOTYPE


Um. What?
User avatar
Heat3
RealGM
Posts: 20,396
And1: 16,169
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: Where all the children are above average.
Contact:
   

 

Post#18 » by Heat3 » Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:11 am

Dr. Z is anything but an idiot. He has that sweet gig of picking NFL games with Brooklyn Decker. That old dog can teach us all a trick or two.

Image
Pat Riley wrote:There are only two options regarding commitment. You're either IN or you're OUT. There is no such thing as life in-between.

James Johnson wrote:The culture is REAL.

Image
gooGD
Rookie
Posts: 1,074
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

 

Post#19 » by gooGD » Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:20 am

DaGoodz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



BEST DT IN THE LEAGUE
THE NEW PROTOTYPE


Guys like Jason Taylor and Osi have really paved the way for the new prototypical DE/DL er.

Justin Tuck is nothing but a extension of those two. Tuck will be the eventual successor to Strahan once he retires.

Teams now want athletic, quick, powerful guys with good motors to be in DE. Its no longer about size, weight, and technicalities.
User avatar
Al n' Perk No Layups!
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,532
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2006

 

Post#20 » by Al n' Perk No Layups! » Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:33 am

PacersRule07 wrote:I think he gushes about Justin Tuck a little too much, there's no doubt he's becoming a top playmaker, but the Giants best defensive player? Maybe most valuable.


He most likely is. Osi, despite the numbers he put up, disappointed me this year, throwing away the Philly game, he really didn't get enough pressure on the opposing QB. Justin was consistently great, he got pressure just about every game.

Return to The General NFL Board