5 trades from CNNSI

Moderator: bwgood77

shagadelic45
General Manager
Posts: 8,496
And1: 99
Joined: Nov 20, 2001
Location: Budapest, Hungary

5 trades from CNNSI 

Post#1 » by shagadelic45 » Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:15 pm

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/w ... =shareDigg


• Bengals T Anthony Collins for Packers DE Aaron Kampman


• Bills WR Terrell Owens to the Bears for a second-round draft pick


• Browns QB Brady Quinn for Titans QB Vince Young


• Ravens DT Brandon McKinney and a late-round draft pick for Texans DB Dunta Robinson


• Chiefs OLB Derrick Johnson for Steelers WR Limas Sweed
User avatar
Ong_dynasty
Head Coach
Posts: 6,386
And1: 355
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London
         

Re: 5 trades from CNNSI 

Post#2 » by Ong_dynasty » Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:43 am

T.O for second is too much...for one year...I wouldnt give more than a 4th or 5th really
Do Bengals have enough depth at T?
Why would anybody want VY?
Texans already have a useless secondary and they wanna make it work?
Probably the Johnson v Sweed is the only one that makes any sense
User avatar
PhilipNelsonFan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,246
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 11, 2004

Re: 5 trades from CNNSI 

Post#3 » by PhilipNelsonFan » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:24 am

Oy. Each one of those trades is worse than the next.

1. Cincinnati has very mediocre depth at T. It would look a lot better if Andre Smith was healthy, but he's not and there's no sense in wishing him back on the field sooner. Kampman would be a huge asset for the Bengals but right now Cincinnati isn't hurting for defensive end help as they have in the past.

2. The Owens-to-the-Bears trade is not awful, and the price may be right in spite of all that TO brings to a team. I don't believe there's any way, however, the Bills can make that trade even as a face-saving gesture, which makes it hard to consider seriously.

3. BQ for VY does nothing for either team, as a change of scenery will not necessarily help them develop into NFL-caliber passers.

4. The Texans would be trading their best defensive back by miles off one of the worst secondaries in football for a DT and a late-round pick? Yikes.

5. Again, this is not really a case where change of scenery would help, especially regarding Johnson. Pittsburgh's outside linebackers have played well; they just hurt for Troy Polamalu to return, and he will. Limas Sweed looks like he won't make it to a second contract at this rate.
Tim Lehrbach wrote:I will break the Rose Garden.
Icness
NFL Analyst
Posts: 16,964
And1: 129
Joined: Apr 30, 2001
Location: Back in the 616
Contact:
   

Re: 5 trades from CNNSI 

Post#4 » by Icness » Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:01 pm

The Bengals don't need Kampman. If anything they need another tackle behind Collins. I have heard Kampman to St. Louis for a pick is being discussed, and that makes much more sense.

Vince Young playing under Eric Mangini? That's not a change of scenery, that's a funeral for his career. The Browns are not shopping Brady. I've heard that from inside their locker room and from a couple of beat writers. They have gotten some calls--again St. Louis is involved--but he's not going anywhere. For now.

I like the Derrick Johnson for Limas Sweed idea, even though Pittsburgh's D needs a safety and a DE a lot more than another LB. I do expect Johnson to be moved, more likely than any other player mentioned here. Robinson could be moved too but I haven't heard anything at all on that front. I know the HOU mgt. was very upset with him for his offseason crap and he's not a great fit in their locker room anymore.
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game
User avatar
Latrell
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,447
And1: 5,552
Joined: May 06, 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa
     

Re: 5 trades from CNNSI 

Post#5 » by Latrell » Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:26 pm

T.O to the Bears is intriguing for obvious reasons but its very risky...A 2nd is way to much though, maybe a 3rd/4th. But even then its risky (for the Bears)

Brady Quinn>>>>>>Vince Young...even though Quinn has sucked mightily Young is just a diasaster right now and Cleveland is just about the worst possible fit for him I can think of.
Image
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,659
And1: 2,186
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: 5 trades from CNNSI 

Post#6 » by High 5 » Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:20 am

That guy gets paid to think of this stuff???
User avatar
Munchlaxatives
RealGM
Posts: 13,897
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
Location: Any way the wind blows...in Houston

Re: 5 trades from CNNSI 

Post#7 » by Munchlaxatives » Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:27 pm

Pretty funny...that's the latest Houston sports radio clown.
I'm sorry I haven't been funny. I am not a comedian. I am Lenny Bruce.
User avatar
CentralQB5
Pro Prospect
Posts: 871
And1: 47
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
Location: The GridIron
Contact:
       

Re: 5 trades from CNNSI 

Post#8 » by CentralQB5 » Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:53 pm

Why would Chicago ever want to give up a 2nd rounder for TO who only will be there for a little over half the year. If the Bears did that they would be stupid
Image

Return to The General NFL Board