A_dub06 wrote:Spider156 wrote:vege wrote:Bridges was an example. Markkanen was another example. Neither of them are available.
You can go for Murray, or someone else. My point is, if someone is giving you a better fit than Ivey you trade Ivey without thinking twice.
If someone make an offer for Cade or Duren, you don't trade them at all.
I posted a ton of times that I would trade Ivey + Wiseman for Cam Johnson.
The question is was the Grant trade worth it? Right now we’re begging for a Jerami Grant and whether you or another fan care to admit, Grant with his contract may be able to get you a FRP at this point seeing the unavailability of wings like Grant/Tobias level or OG. Was Duren worth it? From getting a franchise center with high potential yes it was worth it. But Duren is also the most replaceable player we have being a rim runner. Sarr is already more talented than Duren. If we get a chance to draft Sarr, I’d trade Duren without thinking twice about it because Duren can get us Mikal Bridges or Markannen type. Of course they have Claxton and Kessler. That’s what I’m saying, duren is replaceable.
Sarr being compared to JJJ is an extremely lazy take form the draft “experts” and I’ve already said this on another thread but I live in Perth, Western Australia where Sarr plays for the Perth Wildcats and the 3 point line is further in (Fiba distance) than the NBA 3 and I’m
less confident in him developing an actual nba 3 point shot from what I’ve seen, not to mention at this stage whilst he can produce statistically they are still a little hollow in the sense they aren’t winning plays.
With all that aside though, I still agree with the underlying premise of your point and would trade Duren if it would net us a haul of picks in 2025 or beyond, since it gives us a chance to really open things up. Durens path to becoming a player that’s a game changer for us is far murkier than Ivey’s or Thompsons imo.
Preface by saying I do like Duren a lot on this roster and all this talk about trading Ivey/Ausar is old because it's the mindset looking for a solution without necessarily finding the root cause
Having said that, what do people realistically think Duren can become? We have to factor in this day and age that just because you can anchor the paint, rebound, and rim run, that isn't enough for you to be part of a big 3 let alone a big 2 in this league. It's hard to find top 5 playoff teams last year that had a guy like Duren be a part of a core 3 making noise. It's been all about pace & space wings and centers and sprinkling some great guard play from guys like Halli, Brunson, and Shai
Isn't Duren basically 90% Ayton in his first couple PHX years?
https://stathead.com/basketball/versus-finder.cgi?request=1&seasons_type=perchoice&player_id1=durenja01&p1yrfrom=2023&p1yrto=2024&player_id2=aytonde01&p2yrfrom=2019&p2yrto=2020They're basically mirror images of each other (shot attempts are far more with Ayton, granted). Unless Duren magically becomes a guy that becomes a 3 or more AST type of guy or can actually space the floor on 4+ attempts per game, I personally do not see him as a core 3 guy unless he can be had for a discount. I hesitate to declare the core is Cade/Duren and then the rest