#45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,869
- And1: 1,140
- Joined: Jul 04, 2016
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
At least ATL is going to lose and CHI-PHI plays tonight.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Junior
- Posts: 435
- And1: 266
- Joined: Jun 27, 2022
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
I thought it should it have been addressed before the season started.tmorgan wrote:I’m a little disappointed in Langdon for not addressing the backup PG need already. It’s not that Sasser is terrible, he’s just not a point guard. When Cade sits our whole offense looks shakey. Don’t like that.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 41,153
- And1: 4,625
- Joined: Sep 05, 2004
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
While I mostly agree, this is good for Sassers' development regardless of whether he's a PG or not. He'll be a better player for it next season and we'll get Ivey back, so it could be taken as us doubling down on development vs trying to pick up a few more regular season wins. Us being surprisingly competitive at this point in the season sorta pushes it to an even weirder place though so I'm curious to see how the trade deadline plays out. If we decide to make a stronger push for 6+ seeding then maybe we have to re-evaluate development vs. competitive play. We'll see..Absolutia wrote:I thought it should it have been addressed before the season started.tmorgan wrote:I’m a little disappointed in Langdon for not addressing the backup PG need already. It’s not that Sasser is terrible, he’s just not a point guard. When Cade sits our whole offense looks shakey. Don’t like that.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,920
- And1: 2,204
- Joined: Jun 25, 2013
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
Cowology wrote:While I mostly agree, this is good for Sassers' development regardless of whether he's a PG or not. He'll be a better player for it next season and we'll get Ivey back, so it could be taken as us doubling down on development vs trying to pick up a few more regular season wins. Us being surprisingly competitive at this point in the season sorta pushes it to an even weirder place though so I'm curious to see how the trade deadline plays out. If we decide to make a stronger push for 6+ seeding then maybe we have to re-evaluate development vs. competitive play. We'll see..Absolutia wrote:I thought it should it have been addressed before the season started.tmorgan wrote:I’m a little disappointed in Langdon for not addressing the backup PG need already. It’s not that Sasser is terrible, he’s just not a point guard. When Cade sits our whole offense looks shakey. Don’t like that.
I just don't see tge development of Sasser as a 1 to be a valid enough reason to neglect the position all year. Especially given how badly he looked last year and continued to struggle in the offseason/preseason. A move (albeit small) should have been made.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,967
- And1: 4,895
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
Jalen Suggs is a reckless player. I’m glad we’re done seeing them this season.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,702
- And1: 9,539
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
coordinator0 wrote:bstein14 wrote:breezypeezy wrote:Im not sure I would allow Tek a seat on the plane out of town for as little as he cared to contribute during the minutes he chewed up.
A lot of nights it feels like he does the least out of all the 10 guys in the rotation. Tough matchup asking him to defend one of Franz or Banchero at times but overall just seems to bring very little if he isn't hitting shots.
Yeah. If Tek isn't super active with his feet when his shot isn't falling he's not useful at all. That's the spot in the rotation that needs to be upgraded if there isn't a secondary ball-handler worth bringing in available on the market.
More and more I feel like Ausar should be playing close to 35 MPG with Font as a low MPG backup for him. A lot of nights its starting to feel like Ausar is our 2nd best player out there... not always, but enough that his MPG should continue to grow.
C: Duren(24) / Stew(24)
F: Ausar(35) / Font(13)
F: Tobias(31) / Holland II(17)
G: THJ(24) / Beasley(24)
G: Cade(35) / Sasser(13)
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,752
- And1: 4,298
- Joined: Jun 21, 2019
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
The Pistons are not ready to beat a team like this yet. Orlando is really a 50+ win team when healthy and a team with multiple high level scorers and length everywhere, really tough matchup for a Pistons team that's pretty limited offensively beyond Cade.
You see Banchero and Wagner go off and you see visions of what it would be like if Cade had his tag team partner. His guy right now is....Beasley? Ivey showed some improvement this season but not sure if he's that guy.
You see Banchero and Wagner go off and you see visions of what it would be like if Cade had his tag team partner. His guy right now is....Beasley? Ivey showed some improvement this season but not sure if he's that guy.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,891
- And1: 15,077
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
bstein14 wrote:coordinator0 wrote:bstein14 wrote:
A lot of nights it feels like he does the least out of all the 10 guys in the rotation. Tough matchup asking him to defend one of Franz or Banchero at times but overall just seems to bring very little if he isn't hitting shots.
Yeah. If Tek isn't super active with his feet when his shot isn't falling he's not useful at all. That's the spot in the rotation that needs to be upgraded if there isn't a secondary ball-handler worth bringing in available on the market.
More and more I feel like Ausar should be playing close to 35 MPG with Font as a low MPG backup for him. A lot of nights its starting to feel like Ausar is our 2nd best player out there... not always, but enough that his MPG should continue to grow.
C: Duren(24) / Stew(24)
F: Ausar(35) / Font(13)
F: Tobias(31) / Holland II(17)
G: THJ(24) / Beasley(24)
G: Cade(35) / Sasser(13)
Tek and Harris are below average three point shooters this season. Given their deficiencies in about everything else they are clear liabilities.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
- zeebneeb
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,472
- And1: 12,992
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
Tough loss last night, loved the passion and fire. Pistons feel like they should win every game now.
Bickerstaff getting tossed was awesome.
Love all these growing pains, becoming a good basketball team.
Bickerstaff getting tossed was awesome.
Love all these growing pains, becoming a good basketball team.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Junior
- Posts: 435
- And1: 266
- Joined: Jun 27, 2022
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
This is all dependent on how the management view Sasser. Personally, I saw him as surplus to requirements at the start of the season, but maybe they see him as a potential part of the future and worth investing time in. I didn't consider him as a ballhandler, but that must be something TL sees in him, because having only Cade and JI (who will mostly play together) as the only ballhendlers on the team, would be a bizarre oversight for anyone.Cowology wrote:While I mostly agree, this is good for Sassers' development regardless of whether he's a PG or not. He'll be a better player for it next season and we'll get Ivey back, so it could be taken as us doubling down on development vs trying to pick up a few more regular season wins. Us being surprisingly competitive at this point in the season sorta pushes it to an even weirder place though so I'm curious to see how the trade deadline plays out. If we decide to make a stronger push for 6+ seeding then maybe we have to re-evaluate development vs. competitive play. We'll see..Absolutia wrote:I thought it should it have been addressed before the season started.tmorgan wrote:I’m a little disappointed in Langdon for not addressing the backup PG need already. It’s not that Sasser is terrible, he’s just not a point guard. When Cade sits our whole offense looks shakey. Don’t like that.
While I'm not blown away by him as a PG, he is better than I thought he would be and I think he's improved since taking it on. Not sure he's going to be a long term solution though.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,698
- And1: 1,385
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
Every time we play a decent or competitive team, we'll have this same issue without Ivey. We have to make a bandaid trade.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
- zeebneeb
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,472
- And1: 12,992
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
This is true, but how much of a bandaid?Neptune wrote:Every time we play a decent or competitive team, we'll have this same issue without Ivey. We have to make a bandaid trade.
How much will that cost?
If it's obvious to us(and just about everyone who watches basketball)that without Ivey the Pistons need another ball-handler and playmaker, its gotta be obvious to TL.
One things for sure, its only about a week away from the trade deadline, so we're gonna find out soon.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Junior
- Posts: 435
- And1: 266
- Joined: Jun 27, 2022
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
I do think it looks pretty bizarre to consider Cade, JI and Sassser as adequate personnel to cover ballhandling duties, especially on a fifteen man roster. I'd have thought that at the very least a Cory Joseph type vet should be occupying that position before Sasser.Invictus88 wrote:Cowology wrote:While I mostly agree, this is good for Sassers' development regardless of whether he's a PG or not. He'll be a better player for it next season and we'll get Ivey back, so it could be taken as us doubling down on development vs trying to pick up a few more regular season wins. Us being surprisingly competitive at this point in the season sorta pushes it to an even weirder place though so I'm curious to see how the trade deadline plays out. If we decide to make a stronger push for 6+ seeding then maybe we have to re-evaluate development vs. competitive play. We'll see..Absolutia wrote:I thought it should it have been addressed before the season started.
I just don't see tge development of Sasser as a 1 to be a valid enough reason to neglect the position all year. Especially given how badly he looked last year and continued to struggle in the offseason/preseason. A move (albeit small) should have been made.
I think that maybe within the organisation, there is actually more belief in Sasser as an asset than I have, but I have a hard time believing that.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,322
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
I'm bummed that Ivey is missing out on the developmental reps to help him grow into the role of what this team needs in that slot, but I'm far from convinced that he was there yet or that he'd turn games like last night's into wins. I agree that we're just not ready to win games like that yet and that we need that #2 alongside Cade, whether that's something Ivey or Holland or Ausar eventually grows into or whether it comes from elsewhere.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
- GreekAlex
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,195
- And1: 1,813
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
Kalamazoo317 wrote:I'm bummed that Ivey is missing out on the developmental reps to help him grow into the role of what this team needs in that slot, but I'm far from convinced that he was there yet or that he'd turn games like last night's into wins. I agree that we're just not ready to win games like that yet and that we need that #2 alongside Cade, whether that's something Ivey or Holland or Ausar eventually grows into or whether it comes from elsewhere.
If Ivey and Harris were available, I think this game has a different outcome.
It may have if Tobias didn’t have to exit.
Momentum is huge and we didn’t have the firepower to fight back when Orlando was making a comeback.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,526
- And1: 1,976
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
Neptune wrote:Every time we play a decent or competitive team, we'll have this same issue without Ivey. We have to make a bandaid trade.
If we could Sexton without handing the Jazz too much, sure. If Jordan Clarkson was healthy, I’d do it. I just don’t see the point of going after McCollum and don’t see other moves that apply as a “bandaid trade”
Absolutia wrote:I do think it looks pretty bizarre to consider Cade, JI and Sassser as adequate personnel to cover ballhandling duties, especially on a fifteen man roster. I'd have thought that at the very least a Corey Joseph type vet should be occupying that position before Sasser.Invictus88 wrote:Cowology wrote:While I mostly agree, this is good for Sassers' development regardless of whether he's a PG or not. He'll be a better player for it next season and we'll get Ivey back, so it could be taken as us doubling down on development vs trying to pick up a few more regular season wins. Us being surprisingly competitive at this point in the season sorta pushes it to an even weirder place though so I'm curious to see how the trade deadline plays out. If we decide to make a stronger push for 6+ seeding then maybe we have to re-evaluate development vs. competitive play. We'll see..
I just don't see the development of Sasser as a 1 to be a valid enough reason to neglect the position all year. Especially given how badly he looked last year and continued to struggle in the offseason/preseason. A move (albeit small) should have been made.
I think that maybe within the organization, there is actually more belief in Sasser as an asset than I have, but I have a hard time believing that.
We had at least one topic about what PG to get. I’ve never liked the idea of not having at least one true point guard on a roster, especially a young roster. I get wanting to have roster flexibility, but I doubt it would’ve hurt that to sign a decent veteran point guard for the situations where we needed one.
Wouldn’t have solved the issue, but I’m convinced Sacramento would’ve included at least 3 seconds to get us to take Davion Mitchell (obviously not much of a veteran, but wouldve made for sense than adding Moore, jr) and Sasha Vezenkov (opted completely out of his contract) for some top 58 protected second round pick
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,311
- And1: 1,383
- Joined: Nov 11, 2008
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
bstein14 wrote:coordinator0 wrote:bstein14 wrote:
A lot of nights it feels like he does the least out of all the 10 guys in the rotation. Tough matchup asking him to defend one of Franz or Banchero at times but overall just seems to bring very little if he isn't hitting shots.
Yeah. If Tek isn't super active with his feet when his shot isn't falling he's not useful at all. That's the spot in the rotation that needs to be upgraded if there isn't a secondary ball-handler worth bringing in available on the market.
More and more I feel like Ausar should be playing close to 35 MPG with Font as a low MPG backup for him. A lot of nights its starting to feel like Ausar is our 2nd best player out there... not always, but enough that his MPG should continue to grow.
C: Duren(24) / Stew(24)
F: Ausar(35) / Font(13)
F: Tobias(31) / Holland II(17)
G: THJ(24) / Beasley(24)
G: Cade(35) / Sasser(13)
I think Ausar is still working himself back into full-time playing shape. To me that might be the only thing holding him back at the moment. Just imagine where he would be at this point without the blood clot issues.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,702
- And1: 9,539
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
coordinator0 wrote:bstein14 wrote:coordinator0 wrote:
Yeah. If Tek isn't super active with his feet when his shot isn't falling he's not useful at all. That's the spot in the rotation that needs to be upgraded if there isn't a secondary ball-handler worth bringing in available on the market.
More and more I feel like Ausar should be playing close to 35 MPG with Font as a low MPG backup for him. A lot of nights its starting to feel like Ausar is our 2nd best player out there... not always, but enough that his MPG should continue to grow.
C: Duren(24) / Stew(24)
F: Ausar(35) / Font(13)
F: Tobias(31) / Holland II(17)
G: THJ(24) / Beasley(24)
G: Cade(35) / Sasser(13)
I think Ausar is still working himself back into full-time playing shape. To me that might be the only thing holding him back at the moment. Just imagine where he would be at this point without the blood clot issues.
His brother has been playing insane for the Rockets a top 5 defender in the league and he's putting up 17.3 PPG, 11.0 RPG and 3.7 APG in 14 games as a starter this season. He's only starting since Jabari Smith Jr got injured you'd have to assume that one of Jabari Smith, Dillon Brooks, or Jalen Green are going to have to be going to the bench and they will keep starting Amen the way he has been playing.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,752
- And1: 4,298
- Joined: Jun 21, 2019
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
Neptune wrote:Every time we play a decent or competitive team, we'll have this same issue without Ivey. We have to make a bandaid trade.
The Pistons are 4-4 against play-in to playoff teams since Ivey got injured, not exactly drowning without him.
With that said, they do need to make a trade to help out Cade who is going to get worn down at some point from carrying the entire load. Back to back 10+ turnover games points to a guy who is taking on too much and eventually it's going to catch up to him and the Pistons.
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,322
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: #45 - Pistons@Magic - 7pm ET
GreekAlex wrote:Kalamazoo317 wrote:I'm bummed that Ivey is missing out on the developmental reps to help him grow into the role of what this team needs in that slot, but I'm far from convinced that he was there yet or that he'd turn games like last night's into wins. I agree that we're just not ready to win games like that yet and that we need that #2 alongside Cade, whether that's something Ivey or Holland or Ausar eventually grows into or whether it comes from elsewhere.
If Ivey and Harris were available, I think this game has a different outcome.
It may have if Tobias didn’t have to exit.
Momentum is huge and we didn’t have the firepower to fight back when Orlando was making a comeback.
No Ivey *and* no Harris does leave them pretty short of players who can create their own shot when Cade's on the bench.