ImageImageImage

Dumars calls Drummond untouchable

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

willywazza
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,311
And1: 434
Joined: May 17, 2013

Re: Dumars calls Drummond untouchable 

Post#21 » by willywazza » Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:50 am

How often do you manage to acquire two young big men with tremendous promise?

Hold onto them both.

Detroit has something that most teams would KILL to have.
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Dumars calls Drummond untouchable 

Post#22 » by Blkbrd671 » Sun Jul 21, 2013 3:40 am

Timmaytime wrote:Link below, author talks about Monroe being possibly available and the fact that Drummond shouldn't be quite "untouchable". Interesting read

http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/07/17/joe-dumars-calls-andre-drummond-untouchable-but-what-about-greg-monroe/


Barley a article and horrible read


He just says of the two. Moose is more likely to be the one traded. Possibly being traded is a reach
Clarity
Banned User
Posts: 5,610
And1: 843
Joined: Jun 14, 2012
   

Re: Dumars calls Drummond untouchable 

Post#23 » by Clarity » Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:28 am

engelbert321 wrote:Am I the only who thinks Moose won't command max salary? .


Yes you are
Clarity
Banned User
Posts: 5,610
And1: 843
Joined: Jun 14, 2012
   

Re: Dumars calls Drummond untouchable 

Post#24 » by Clarity » Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:28 am

willywazza wrote:How often do you manage to acquire two young big men with tremendous promise?

Hold onto them both.

Detroit has something that most teams would KILL to have.


This x 100000000
Jodi
Banned User
Posts: 4,520
And1: 52
Joined: Jul 23, 2011

Re: Dumars calls Drummond untouchable 

Post#25 » by Jodi » Sun Jul 21, 2013 8:13 am

willywazza wrote:How often do you manage to acquire two young big men with tremendous promise?

Hold onto them both.

Detroit has something that most teams would KILL to have.

Preach to them willy!!. 8-)
rock digger
Junior
Posts: 328
And1: 54
Joined: Jan 16, 2013

Re: Dumars calls Drummond untouchable 

Post#26 » by rock digger » Sun Jul 21, 2013 8:59 am

engelbert321 wrote:Am I the only who thinks Moose won't command max salary? 10-12 mil/year is my best bet. He should get lower than what Josh Smith got (who is a more proven 2 way player).


Al Jefferson could have gotten the max off his rookie contract but decided against it since he hadn't "earned" it yet (he still got 13 million per year). Jefferson is probably Monroe's closest match, and with teams being more willing to give out max deals to pretty much any quality big man (Lopez, Hibbert), it's reasonable to assume Monroe will get the max. The reason Josh Smith isn't getting max money is that he isn't 6'11.
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,527
And1: 1,230
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: Dumars calls Drummond untouchable 

Post#27 » by Warspite » Tue Jul 23, 2013 1:15 pm

engelbert321 wrote:Am I the only who thinks Moose won't command max salary? 10-12 mil/year is my best bet. He should get lower than what Josh Smith got (who is a more proven 2 way player).



Actualy its going to be worse than that. He is a RFA so if the Lakers for example want him they are going to offer some crazy frontloaded contract that is poison pilled up in order to try to steal him away.

If Monroe wasnt going to get Max then he would have extended already. From here on we dont pay Monroe what hes worth. We pay him what other teams were willing to overpay to get him.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
Posts: 25,973
And1: 4,897
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: Dumars calls Drummond untouchable 

Post#28 » by ComboGuardCity » Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:06 pm

Warspite wrote:
engelbert321 wrote:Am I the only who thinks Moose won't command max salary? 10-12 mil/year is my best bet. He should get lower than what Josh Smith got (who is a more proven 2 way player).



Actualy its going to be worse than that. He is a RFA so if the Lakers for example want him they are going to offer some crazy frontloaded contract that is poison pilled up in order to try to steal him away.

If Monroe wasnt going to get Max then he would have extended already. From here on we dont pay Monroe what hes worth. We pay him what other teams were willing to overpay to get him.


This isn't really a concern for a max level player. No incentive to sign a back loaded contract and we have the cap space to match a front loaded one.

Return to Detroit Pistons