Stuckey for Ariza

DCintheD · Post #1 » by **DCintheD** » Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:47 pm

simple trade, addresses needs for both sides

Joe Berry · Post #2 » by **Joe Berry** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:45 am

why would the Wizards give up their starting SF, best defender, best 3pt shooter for a backup PG/SG?

Clarity · Post #3 » by **Clarity** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:52 am

Joe Asberry wrote:why would the Wizards give up their starting SF, best defender, best 3pt shooter for a backup PG/SG?

they wouldnt obviously.

Post #4 » by **Timmaytime** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 1:02 am

Joe Asberry wrote:why would the Wizards give up their starting SF, best defender, best 3pt shooter for a backup PG/SG?

Maybe if Otto Porter was coming along better. Beal and Wall have gotten alot of burn, Webster isn't a two, and Maynor has had a terrible year. They need guard depth badly, but Porters slow development limits that

jakebernat · Post #5 » by **jakebernat** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 2:36 am

stuckey's a better pure scorer and player with the ball in his hands. he can also play PG in spurts. ariza's a better shooter and overall defender. I don't think washington does this deal, but i think it's much closer to fair than people think

Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app

Neptune · Post #6 » by **Neptune** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:27 am

DCintheD wrote:simple trade, addresses needs for both sides

Talent wise, it's a good trade. But I doubt the Wizards would do it. They've been playing good basketball lately, why mess with chemistry in the starting line-up.

DCintheD · Post #7 » by **DCintheD** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:52 am

throw in Singler and throw back Vesely maybe a 2nd, I dunno, u guys make a good point they probly wouldnt wanna mess with what they got

princeofpalace · Post #8 » by **princeofpalace** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 12:33 pm

I've been proposing this trade for months now.

It works, while Washington is starting Ariza- they have Martell Webster- who is a better shooter than Ariza and Otto Porter waiting in the wings. What Washington really needs is a stretch 4 or a 3rd guard so i think something based around Ariza/Stuck could work.

That being said, I think the more likely scenario is for us to just make a play for Ariza in FA, he's the perfect fit for this team,

Post #9 » by **dVs33** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:08 pm

I'd rather use lesser parts (CV, Bynum, Jonas etc) to get Webster, than trading stuckey for Ariza.
Stuckey has been the most consistent guard we have this year. If stuckey goes, then Bynum gets more burn and i don't want to see that.

Damon_3388 · Post #10 » by **Damon_3388** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:51 pm

Timmaytime wrote:
Joe Asberry wrote:why would the Wizards give up their starting SF, best defender, best 3pt shooter for a backup PG/SG?

Maybe if Otto Porter was coming along better. Beal and Wall have gotten alot of burn, Webster isn't a two, and Maynor has had a terrible year. They need guard depth badly, but Porters slow development limits that

20 year old not getting playing time behind veterans and still taking time to adjust to NBA half way through his first NBA season, after being injured for the first couple of months of the year = "slow development".

OK.

pistontr · Post #11 » by **pistontr** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:39 pm

and classic question. WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT?

piston1423 · Post #12 » by **piston1423** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:52 pm

I rather just sign Ariza to a contract in the off season. I hope someone like the Thunder or Portland pick up Stuckey honestly.

Post #13 » by **Timmaytime** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 7:48 pm

Damon_3388 wrote:
Timmaytime wrote:
Joe Asberry wrote:why would the Wizards give up their starting SF, best defender, best 3pt shooter for a backup PG/SG?

Maybe if Otto Porter was coming along better. Beal and Wall have gotten alot of burn, Webster isn't a two, and Maynor has had a terrible year. They need guard depth badly, but Porters slow development limits that

20 year old not getting playing time behind veterans and still taking time to adjust to NBA half way through his first NBA season, after being injured for the first couple of months of the year = "slow development".

OK.

In the same way KCP is a "slow development"... Wiz are a playoff team, they can't afford to be playing Otto Porter starters minutes if they want to win games. If he was further along they could do this

sc8581 · Post #14 » by **sc8581** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:50 pm

Timmaytime wrote:
Damon_3388 wrote:
Timmaytime wrote:
Maybe if Otto Porter was coming along better. Beal and Wall have gotten alot of burn, Webster isn't a two, and Maynor has had a terrible year. They need guard depth badly, but Porters slow development limits that

20 year old not getting playing time behind veterans and still taking time to adjust to NBA half way through his first NBA season, after being injured for the first couple of months of the year = "slow development".

OK.

In the same way KCP is a "slow development"... Wiz are a playoff team, they can't afford to be playing Otto Porter starters minutes if they want to win games. If he was further along they could do this

KCP is developing slowly but Porter has just been god awful.

ImHeisenberg · Post #15 » by **ImHeisenberg** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:53 pm

sc8581 wrote:KCP is developing slowly but Porter has just been god awful.

He definitely fell behind with that hip injury that carried through a lot of the early season. I hate writing young players off too quickly, but I'm not jealous of Washington in regards to that pick.

sc8581 · Post #16 » by **sc8581** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:16 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:
sc8581 wrote:KCP is developing slowly but Porter has just been god awful.

He definitely fell behind with that hip injury that carried through a lot of the early season. I hate writing young players off too quickly, but I'm not jealous of Washington in regards to that pick.

I'm certainly not writing him off, even if he just finds a role he's really good at in the future I wouldn't consider him a bust or anything especially in this draft class. What's funny is I think his 2 best games were against us lol.

Laimbeer · Post #17 » by **Laimbeer** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:23 pm

ImHeisenberg wrote:
sc8581 wrote:KCP is developing slowly but Porter has just been god awful.

He definitely fell behind with that hip injury that carried through a lot of the early season. I hate writing young players off too quickly, but I'm not jealous of Washington in regards to that pick.

Any chance they'd consider Porter for KCP?

The Penguin · Post #18 » by **The Penguin** » Sun Feb 16, 2014 11:04 pm

Stuckey, Singler, Mitchell

For

Porter, Webster

Wiz add Stuckey as their 3rd guard and add two young players while clearing out extra cap space this summer.

We add Porter as our SF of the future and Webster to give us a shooter.

ImHeisenberg · Post #19 » by **ImHeisenberg** » Mon Feb 17, 2014 12:10 am

Laimbeer wrote:
ImHeisenberg wrote:
sc8581 wrote:KCP is developing slowly but Porter has just been god awful.

He definitely fell behind with that hip injury that carried through a lot of the early season. I hate writing young players off too quickly, but I'm not jealous of Washington in regards to that pick.

Any chance they'd consider Porter for KCP?

Probably not, with Beal and Webster signed long term.

DetroitDon15 · Post #20 » by **DetroitDon15** » Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:36 am

Piston Prince wrote:Stuckey, Singler, Mitchell

For

Porter, Webster

Wiz add Stuckey as their 3rd guard and add two young players while clearing out extra cap space this summer.

We add Porter as our SF of the future and Webster to give us a shooter.

Id pass. Swap Singler for Datome than it works.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using RealGM Forums mobile app