haulerch wrote:Lucidity wrote:Wait, did someone really just say Josh was the Pistons best all around player? Lol
SVG may think that but... Nah, actually SVG can't think, his resume & past success says he can't think that.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Not that I believe your answer won't be ridiculously bias, but humor me. What would make you believe SVG thinks otherwise? Is it really that inconceivable to believe Josh Smith is the best player on a 5 win team? Perhaps that's why the Pistons are a terrible team?
Sure Monroe is a better scorer but he isn't a better passer, defender, shot blocker than Smith.
It's not hard to see that Smith is probably, at the moment the best all around player. SVG plays Smith a lot of minutes for a reason and it's because he believes Smith gives him the best chance to win.
Before we begin, you need to understand the difference between bias & truth. My history as a poster here is clear. I speak the truth, even when it's not popular. I don't so emotional responses, I bring clarity to a discussion. In no way does that mean I'm always right, but you won't catch me fabricating or fox news'ing stuff.
Monroe is better at everything but shot blocking than Smith. The only thing Josh would be among the 1 or 2 best at aside from shot blocking (which he is criminally underrated at, id actually say Josh is among the 4 or 5 best shot blockers in the entire league) is pure athleticism & even that is a stretch w/ his athleticism diminished these days.
Neither of us can say one way or another what Stan thinks, that would be speculation but the entire world knows what Josh is & Stan's history says he does too.
But 5 wins is 5 wins like you said, so does any of this actually matter? The team sucks.. Badly
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
ImHeisenberg wrote:Lucidity wrote:Side note- the worst thing that happen to the Kings was KJ keeping them in Sac. Chris Hansen would have been 30 mill times the owner their current guy is.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
The fans will never agree to that statement. But, from a financial stand point, Seattle was a no-brainer.
Agreed.