Kilo wrote:Teague/Korver wouldn't have been a bad deal for a S&T'd Monroe from Atlanta's perspective IMO.

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Kilo wrote:Teague/Korver wouldn't have been a bad deal for a S&T'd Monroe from Atlanta's perspective IMO.
sfballa13 wrote:From the Goodwill article today in the Detroit News:
"The Sacramento Kings are still interested in Smith, a source told The Detroit News. The man with final say, Van Gundy, turned down the Kings proposal over the summer — one that amounted to a pu pu platter of talent relative to Smith's, as he wanted a chance to see if he could unlock all of Smith's versatility and turn it into consistency"
So originally it was Mike Malone who was against trading for Smith now Goodwill comes out and says it really was SVG that denied the trade for Smith.
If this is true Van Gundy is a moron. We could have had a fresh start without Josh Smith, played Thompson and Monroe at the 4, and signed Monroe to a new deal.
Even if we gave Monroe a huge deal and he didnt work out for us he would still be on contract and tradeable to any of the teams that have cap space this summer.
If Smith is on this roster by the end of the season and we lose Monroe for nothing mark this down as SVG first huge failure as GM
sfballa13 wrote:From the Goodwill article today in the Detroit News:
"The Sacramento Kings are still interested in Smith, a source told The Detroit News. The man with final say, Van Gundy, turned down the Kings proposal over the summer — one that amounted to a pu pu platter of talent relative to Smith's, as he wanted a chance to see if he could unlock all of Smith's versatility and turn it into consistency"
So originally it was Mike Malone who was against trading for Smith now Goodwill comes out and says it really was SVG that denied the trade for Smith.
If this is true Van Gundy is a moron. We could have had a fresh start without Josh Smith, played Thompson and Monroe at the 4, and signed Monroe to a new deal.
Even if we gave Monroe a huge deal and he didnt work out for us he would still be on contract and tradeable to any of the teams that have cap space this summer.
If Smith is on this roster by the end of the season and we lose Monroe for nothing mark this down as SVG first huge failure as GM
sfballa13 wrote:From the Goodwill article today in the Detroit News:
"The Sacramento Kings are still interested in Smith, a source told The Detroit News. The man with final say, Van Gundy, turned down the Kings proposal over the summer — one that amounted to a pu pu platter of talent relative to Smith's, as he wanted a chance to see if he could unlock all of Smith's versatility and turn it into consistency"
So originally it was Mike Malone who was against trading for Smith now Goodwill comes out and says it really was SVG that denied the trade for Smith.
If this is true Van Gundy is a moron. We could have had a fresh start without Josh Smith, played Thompson and Monroe at the 4, and signed Monroe to a new deal.
Even if we gave Monroe a huge deal and he didnt work out for us he would still be on contract and tradeable to any of the teams that have cap space this summer.
If Smith is on this roster by the end of the season and we lose Monroe for nothing mark this down as SVG first huge failure as GM