ImageImageImage

Ty Lawson

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#41 » by sc8581 » Wed Mar 2, 2016 10:22 am

Lawson would be a great fit
GBanga3
Rookie
Posts: 1,070
And1: 404
Joined: Jun 20, 2009
Location: The Land of OZ
   

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#42 » by GBanga3 » Wed Mar 2, 2016 11:02 am

He's already on his way, hence why he agreed to a buyout. I wonder what number he'll wear?
-Official #1 Australian Pistons Fan-
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,266
And1: 5,253
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#43 » by Kilo » Wed Mar 2, 2016 1:03 pm

Given Stan and Jeff's personel moves, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt at this point on and trade/signing, however I don't think Lawson comes here. He goes to BKLN for playing time or to a legit contender sorta deal.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,969
And1: 12,470
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#44 » by BadMofoPimp » Wed Mar 2, 2016 1:49 pm

Kilo wrote:Given Stan and Jeff's personel moves, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt at this point on and trade/signing, however I don't think Lawson comes here. He goes to BKLN for playing time or to a legit contender sorta deal.


I would say New York. They are desperate for PG's lately and had many PG's linked to them before the trade deadline and didn't get any.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,266
And1: 5,253
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#45 » by Kilo » Wed Mar 2, 2016 1:54 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
Kilo wrote:Given Stan and Jeff's personel moves, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt at this point on and trade/signing, however I don't think Lawson comes here. He goes to BKLN for playing time or to a legit contender sorta deal.


I would say New York. They are desperate for PG's lately and had many PG's linked to them before the trade deadline and didn't get any.


Supposedly they ruled him out according to a GB/TB post. Could be an issue of trying to learn/play triangle for 25 or so games not being worth it.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
Chillymo
Sophomore
Posts: 101
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 29, 2016

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#46 » by Chillymo » Wed Mar 2, 2016 2:12 pm

I could see the Pistons making a phone call and that's it I doubt we sign him and I doubt he comes here anyway. I think more than likely as sign either McCollum or Thornton or both and cut Anthony.
User avatar
Joe Berry
Veteran
Posts: 2,905
And1: 418
Joined: Aug 09, 2002
Location: Old Europe
 

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#47 » by Joe Berry » Wed Mar 2, 2016 2:57 pm

There were rumors in the offseason the Pistons were interested in Lawson before he got traded to Houston. So it would make some sense and i think it could be a good fit too. But then again with Tolliver out backup PF is the bigger need at the moment. PG is also the most important position in SVG system and Blake is doing fine on offense in short spurts. Obviously Lawson would be an improvement here and if Tolliver is back i would definitely give him a try if no one else has signed him yet.
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,492
And1: 13,022
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#48 » by zeebneeb » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:22 pm

Heres the thing. Lawson would be an outstanding back-up point guard and would fit in perfectly with Stans own "Starters on the bench" style but he comes with a mountain of baggage.

Do we want a volatile older doesnt fit into the core age-wise, and to be frank, drunk, influencing the core of this very young team in the wrong way?

On the other hand Marcus was in legal trouble and has been nothing but brilliant here and I believe in 2nd, 3rd and 4th chances.

He's a damn fine PG but he would HAVE to accept a bench role, period.
rmfc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,918
And1: 936
Joined: Jul 19, 2009
     

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#49 » by rmfc » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:45 pm

zeebneeb wrote:He's a damn fine PG but he would HAVE to accept a bench role, period.


Not sure why there is a discussion on this part. No one is going to offer Lawson a starting job in the NBA. He will only be a backup moving forward (or in an extreme case, a buffer starter before the younger one takes over).

And, yeah, Lawson would make a fine backup here.
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,492
And1: 13,022
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#50 » by zeebneeb » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:48 pm

rmfc wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:He's a damn fine PG but he would HAVE to accept a bench role, period.


Not sure why there is a discussion on this part. No one is going to offer Lawson a starting job in the NBA. He will only be a backup moving forward (or in an extreme case, a buffer starter before the younger one takes over).

And, yeah, Lawson would make a fine backup here.
I am not arguing your point that he will be a backup, more that he has to know that.

Can he even accept that? Can we risk team unity and coming together if we have a player who will not accept his role?
DetroitSho
Head Coach
Posts: 6,857
And1: 2,460
Joined: Sep 28, 2012

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#51 » by DetroitSho » Wed Mar 2, 2016 6:22 pm

zeebneeb wrote:
rmfc wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:He's a damn fine PG but he would HAVE to accept a bench role, period.


Not sure why there is a discussion on this part. No one is going to offer Lawson a starting job in the NBA. He will only be a backup moving forward (or in an extreme case, a buffer starter before the younger one takes over).

And, yeah, Lawson would make a fine backup here.
I am not arguing your point that he will be a backup, more that he has to know that.

Can he even accept that? Can we risk team unity and coming together if we have a player who will not accept his role?

Zeeb seriously, why do you even think for one second there would have to be even one word of conversation spent on getting him to understand that he would be coming off the bench? If the phone rings and it's a 313 area code, he already knows this is for a backup role before the phone is answered.
El Chivo
Starter
Posts: 2,317
And1: 978
Joined: Jun 19, 2015
Location: Roma
       

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#52 » by El Chivo » Thu Mar 3, 2016 6:27 pm

he's going to come off the bench for the Indiana Pacers
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,969
And1: 12,470
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#53 » by BadMofoPimp » Thu Mar 3, 2016 6:30 pm

zeebneeb wrote:Heres the thing. Lawson would be an outstanding back-up point guard and would fit in perfectly with Stans own "Starters on the bench" style but he comes with a mountain of baggage.

Do we want a volatile older doesnt fit into the core age-wise, and to be frank, drunk, influencing the core of this very young team in the wrong way?

On the other hand Marcus was in legal trouble and has been nothing but brilliant here and I believe in 2nd, 3rd and 4th chances.

He's a damn fine PG but he would HAVE to accept a bench role, period.


Barring any team calling him that just lost their starting PG due to injury with 23 games left on the season, Lawson understands that wherever he goes this season, he will be a backup.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
russkopp
Analyst
Posts: 3,183
And1: 1,048
Joined: Jan 30, 2013
       

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#54 » by russkopp » Thu Mar 3, 2016 7:21 pm

Pacers gonna get Lawson...our direct competition getting a solid upgrade. Frick.
Fire Troy Weaver

Return to Detroit Pistons