ImageImageImage

False trade rumor, but good fodder

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

Darko Miliminutes
Analyst
Posts: 3,243
And1: 425
Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Location: A2
       

Re: False trade rumor, but good fodder 

Post#21 » by Darko Miliminutes » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:32 pm

Wall is a mental midget. He freezes under half court pressure. No moxy whatsoever. Serious crunch time choker.

A deer in headlights, when it's on the line.
Will you fools ever realize that when the cameras are on and the microphones are hot, they are Lying to you! Lying to illicit a prescribed reaction, to easier manipulate you.

Useful idiots!
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,491
And1: 13,019
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: False trade rumor, but good fodder 

Post#22 » by zeebneeb » Fri Sep 23, 2016 10:54 pm

Good thing SVG and Bower are running the team.

Holy crap what a terrible deal/idea.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: False trade rumor, but good fodder 

Post#23 » by Pharaoh » Sat Sep 24, 2016 7:05 am

tmorgan wrote:
ImHeisenberg wrote:Take Harris out of the trade, and I'd go for it. I wouldn't miss those two picks if we knew Wall would be our PG going forward, those picks will likely be in the 20's.


Well, sure, but Harris is a big part of the value in the deal.

I'd trade Reggie and Bullock and two 1sts for just Wall (no thanks on Markieff, too risky). Those firsts aren't going to be very good (if they're 2017 and 2019), and it would help our defense a ton. Can't see why Washington would do that, though.


Is the difference between Wall & RJ really 2 firsts AND a season of Bullock?
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,265
And1: 9,750
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: False trade rumor, but good fodder 

Post#24 » by tmorgan » Sat Sep 24, 2016 10:12 am

Pharaoh wrote:
tmorgan wrote:
ImHeisenberg wrote:Take Harris out of the trade, and I'd go for it. I wouldn't miss those two picks if we knew Wall would be our PG going forward, those picks will likely be in the 20's.


Well, sure, but Harris is a big part of the value in the deal.

I'd trade Reggie and Bullock and two 1sts for just Wall (no thanks on Markieff, too risky). Those firsts aren't going to be very good (if they're 2017 and 2019), and it would help our defense a ton. Can't see why Washington would do that, though.


Is the difference between Wall & RJ really 2 firsts AND a season of Bullock?


No, but that's not how marginal pricing works on stars. Once you get to a certain level, you pay a lot for upgrades.

Make no mistake, Wall can run the P&R better than Reggie because he's faster. He's a pretty awful outside shooter, yes, but between his quickness, passing, and most of all, defense, he's a definite upgrade. Not a huge one, but one that could make a real difference on this team.

Now he'd also exacerbate our outside shooting problem. It'd put a lot of pressure on KCP, certainly, but he'd get KCP more good looks. If KCP can't make them, he'd need to be replaced, too. In other words, this isn't going to happen, because I seriously doubt Stan wants to change that much of the roster.
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: False trade rumor, but good fodder 

Post#25 » by mattao313 » Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:29 pm

Eh Wall might be a better passer out the pnr but Reggie is a much better scoring. So you can't say Wall is better.
Championships
User avatar
Manocad
RealGM
Posts: 69,969
And1: 10,562
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Middle Fingerton
Contact:
       

Re: False trade rumor, but good fodder 

Post#26 » by Manocad » Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:30 am

No effing way.
Image
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: False trade rumor, but good fodder 

Post#27 » by Pharaoh » Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:09 am

tmorgan wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:
tmorgan wrote:
Well, sure, but Harris is a big part of the value in the deal.

I'd trade Reggie and Bullock and two 1sts for just Wall (no thanks on Markieff, too risky). Those firsts aren't going to be very good (if they're 2017 and 2019), and it would help our defense a ton. Can't see why Washington would do that, though.


Is the difference between Wall & RJ really 2 firsts AND a season of Bullock?


No, but that's not how marginal pricing works on stars. Once you get to a certain level, you pay a lot for upgrades.

Make no mistake, Wall can run the P&R better than Reggie because he's faster. He's a pretty awful outside shooter, yes, but between his quickness, passing, and most of all, defense, he's a definite upgrade. Not a huge one, but one that could make a real difference on this team.


I don't think that difference is worth it.

If we assume Kieff is worth a first then we're dealing RJ, Harris, Bull & a pick for Wall!

No way!

Return to Detroit Pistons