Game 12: Pistons (6-5) @ Knicks (4-6) - 7:30 PM EST

[BadMofoPimp]

You feel that way because YOU'RE Todd, if you just replace KCP and insert Reggie Jackson. You have a similar undying dislike for Reggie and find no time to praise him when he's doing good, but only to criticize his weaknesses. So of course you empathize with that guy.

Having a differing opinion is not the problem. NEVER admitting to being wrong, only to just switch the argument and deflect from when he's proven wrong is what drives the quality of this board down. It's impossible to have a quality ADULT debate with someone like that. And yes half the board agrees with him, actually more than half the board agrees with him. That's because the consensus on this board has always acknowledged that KCP is an inconsistent shooter. That's not a phenomenon brought on by Todd's "commentary". That was the consensus from the beginning.

But it's the inability to acknowledge his positives that are VERY important to this team, literally staying away from the board for days when KCP is on a good stretch and consistently having a WOODY for KCP criticism. He needs new material.

By the way, this guy just compared Ellenson to Porzingis and legitimately feels Leuer should be benched in favor of him. If you feel like things like this deserve a dignified response then we'll agree to disagree.

This is a freaking message board. I can't believe people get their feelings hurt when others disagree with them. I run into this all the time where people are angry because others views differ to extreme from theirs. It amazes me.

If someone truly pisses me off, as soon as I see their name, I skip to the next post. It is that easy. No ignore or foe function required.

Pull out and put into quotes the exact part of my post where I said my feelings get hurt with what posters post. If that's what you got out of it then, oh boy, for you.

I put the Bold part there for you. But obviously, if you have to create a post to complain about someone, then they either hurt or pissed you off. That is about almost the same thing.

[BadMofoPimp]

You feel that way because YOU'RE Todd, if you just replace KCP and insert Reggie Jackson. You have a similar undying dislike for Reggie and find no time to praise him when he's doing good, but only to criticize his weaknesses. So of course you empathize with that guy.

Having a differing opinion is not the problem. NEVER admitting to being wrong, only to just switch the argument and deflect from when he's proven wrong is what drives the quality of this board down. It's impossible to have a quality ADULT debate with someone like that. And yes half the board agrees with him, actually more than half the board agrees with him. That's because the consensus on this board has always acknowledged that KCP is an inconsistent shooter. That's not a phenomenon brought on by Todd's "commentary". That was the consensus from the beginning.

But it's the inability to acknowledge his positives that are VERY important to this team, literally staying away from the board for days when KCP is on a good stretch and consistently having a WOODY for KCP criticism. He needs new material.

By the way, this guy just compared Ellenson to Porzingis and legitimately feels Leuer should be benched in favor of him. If you feel like things like this deserve a dignified response then we'll agree to disagree.

This is a freaking message board. I can't believe people get their feelings hurt when others disagree with them. I run into this all the time where people are angry because others views differ to extreme from theirs. It amazes me.

If someone truly pisses me off, as soon as I see their name, I skip to the next post. It is that easy. No ignore or foe function required.

By the way, you're amazed people get angry about other people on a message board.

BUUUUT, came right behind that and admitted to getting pissed off by certain posters on this message board. Nice job.

Well, I should have put the words extreme anger to the point where they are flipping out but didn't feel like typing that much. Some posters may irritate me some days, but it is rare because I can just ignore their posts to read other people's posts without a care.

[DetroitSho]

This is a freaking message board. I can't believe people get their feelings hurt when others disagree with them. I run into this all the time where people are angry because others views differ to extreme from theirs. It amazes me.

If someone truly pisses me off, as soon as I see their name, I skip to the next post. It is that easy. No ignore or foe function required.

Pull out and put into quotes the exact part of my post where I said my feelings get hurt with what posters post. If that's what you got out of it then, oh boy, for you.

I put the Bold part there for you. But obviously, if you have to create a post to complain about someone, then they either hurt or pissed you off. That is about almost the same thing.

Actually just like your advice to ignore others, that was the same freaking thing I was saying and my post got quoted opposing my view. I answered that post, THAT'S where my post comes from. I don't personally give 2 s**ts about anybody on this site so anger or getting pissed off doesn't enter the equation for me. But promoting straightforward, honest debate is what I'm getting at. I'll leave you with this, Maker didn't start off the same way he ended up.

[BadMofoPimp]

Pull out and put into quotes the exact part of my post where I said my feelings get hurt with what posters post. If that's what you got out of it then, oh boy, for you.

I put the Bold part there for you. But obviously, if you have to create a post to complain about someone, then they either hurt or pissed you off. That is about almost the same thing.

Actually just like your advice to ignore others, that was the same freaking thing I was saying and my post got quoted opposing my view. I answered that post, THAT'S where my post comes from. I don't personally give 2 s**ts about anybody on this site so anger or getting pissed off doesn't enter the equation for me. But promoting straightforward, honest debate is what I'm getting at. I'll leave you with this, Maker didn't start off the same way he ended up.

Having a thick skin and not taking anything personally is probably why I been around here for over 13 years.

[Han Solo]

I'm getting high. You guys did this.

[Blkbrd671]

Bring Mook off the bench as he has the same playing style as Harris but less efficient and then we can open up mins for Porzingis 2.0

Reggie/ish
KCP/SJ
Harris/Mook
Leuer/Ellenson/Mook
Drummond/Baynes

Mook off the bench makes too much sense when you consider Harris is guarantee on most nights, mismatch at the 3 and Leur is our best pf on both sides of the ball. Mooks playing style and scoring ability would help the second unit that struggles to find offense outside of Ish and Baynes. SVG normally runs one of harris or mook anyways specially for that reason. Stylistically, i feel better with Harris and Leur spotting up rather than Mook.

Now the question is will the drop off defensively from Mook to harris be compensated by the offensive improvement

[In SVG We Trust]

It's not about have another opinion on a discussion, it's about the human race and evolution. This guys are consuming planet resources while they're a step back to humans.

[Shady_]

I'm getting high. You guys did this.

High Han Solo >>>>>>>> Sober Han Solo

[Han Solo]

I'm getting high. You guys did this.

High Han Solo >>>>>>>> Sober Han Solo

I'm just going to rock the synthetic urine taped to my nuts at work every day from now on..

[Pharaoh]

The rotation to rule them all:

Dre 30 / Baynes 10 / Boban 8

Harris 20 / Jon 20 / King 8

Mook 24 / Harris 10 / SJ 14

KCP 48

RJ 30 / Ish 18

Everyone gets to play,
Everyone gets to play,

Everyone gets to go outside!

Sent from my SM-J110F using RealGM mobile app