A_dub06 wrote:Pharaoh wrote:blueadams wrote:Edited OP
Why bother?
Your plan is to sell off as many assets as possible in order to have the opportunity to sign & draft a stud?
Then what? Wait 3 years and repeat that process until eventually you land the next big thing in the Draft?
Sent from my SM-J110F using
RealGM mobile app
It’s a better plan to become a contender than sign a whole bunch of **** to average players and just hope they wake up one day and play as a team. How much $ do we have tied up between Boban, Galloway and Leuer? Like $24m? That’s a whole lot of cash which wasn’t necessary to spend, it’s destroyed our flexibility and those guys don’t play and when they do they suck. Making these signings for ‘depth purposes’ is (Please Use More Appropriate Word) when you don’t have the foundation to build in. **** like this is how you become a treadmill team and lower your ceiling.
After our playoff appearance everyone thought we were a team on the upswing!
Dre had delayed his extension so we could add a free agent (or 2) before the flexibility you speak of vanished.
Our bench was a major problem!
So after missing out on Horford SVG signed Jon, Ish & Bobo to provide depth.
Then last season it all went to crap, although to be fair to Jon he played well the first half of the season. Ish was awesome, Bobo was...wasted.
With the benefit of hindsight we can argue we didn't have the foundation but you gotta remember that at the time Dre was All NBA 3rd team, RJ had got national publicity as a All Star snub, Harris had killed it after arriving etc
Dude I’ve seen you post that you would like to tank in some threads although due to SVG’s stance and it not being an option you don’t entertain it, and then I’ve also seen you bashing tanking in others, persisting to question the tanking model and even say in one thread that you are “tired of loosing” and essentially wanting to build on this group. That is the definition of fence sitting.
This is my take on tanking FTR:
In a post Hinkie/superteam NBA if you want to win a championship in the next decade then you're gonna need a absolute stud! Not a Hayward - a legit franchise guy.
The most likely way to acquire one is via tanking for multiple years since there's no guarantee you'll draft that guy in year one and even if by some miracle you do he's not gonna alter the franchise in one season.
It requires taking a longer view and while
I would be ok with that because there's no path to contention that I can see with this roster I don't believe Gores or SVG would be for one very specific reason:
They're not here to win a title...at least not yet.
IMO they're here to restore some semblance of respectability to the franchise...and as we've seen that's not a easy path to take
I trash tanking proposals because of that - if its not even remotely possible then why persist discussing a dream?
It'd be like discussing a trade for KD over and over and over again!
I am tired of losing. But I know that no matter how much I want this team to be changed, to resemble Piston teams of the past, to adhere to the values I preach it's just not happening.
Should I post that in every thread? I don't see the need to be negative all the time.
Is this just a case of ‘winning cures everything’ and now you think we actually have something in a historically bad conference? This team will never contend, even if Drummond takes a leap forward and Reggie is 100% healthy, there is no reason to keep this roster with a bloated payroll for mediocre players.
Winning cures all? The season just started!
And I stated above that I don't think we can contend as constructed
Again: should I post my negative opinion of this team, of this path in every thread?
Isn't there enough negativity? Maybe not now, but there was last season when I chose to not throw my can of gasoline onto the fire.
Sent from my SM-J110F using
RealGM Forums mobile app