ImageImageImage

Stanley Johnson is bad.

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

afroxnas
Junior
Posts: 328
And1: 167
Joined: Feb 17, 2016
   

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#61 » by afroxnas » Fri Jan 12, 2018 12:14 pm

GimmeDat wrote:
afroxnas wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:
I think we do like him but he's definitely available if it helps push a deal over the line. He's a good backup.

I think this is a fair deal, as long as the protections are pretty light. But whether it's a starter for the Bulls depends on how insistent they are on no long term salary. I'm not too sure what they're thinking, but I think if there's a deal with you guys, this is it.

there’s no way the Bulls will get a former lottery pick on a rookie deal and a future 1 first round for Mirotic, a guys that spent most of the season out because he was knocked out in the teeth by a team mate. That’s a horrible deal for the Pistons and SVG should be fired if he gives it the green light. Giv m Mirotic defense skills I’m doubtful he would even see the floor...


I'd watch some more Mirotic before making such strong judgements. He's our best front-court defender and I think he'd be yours as well. That's just a misnomer because he's European.

Also, having to label him a 'former lottery pick' seems a bit disingenuous given the title of this thread.. draft position doesn't mean much when you're averaging 9 points per 36 on a TS% of 47 in your 3rd year in the league.

I'm not trying to be rude or biased, the same goes the other way - Cameron Payne is a former lottery pick but I wouldn't be asking for much if he was on the market.

I'm also not sure why getting punched in the face is supposed to be an argument against trading for a guy.

You could argue upfront that a protected 1st is what it would take to dump a contract like Leuer's, but you'd also be getting a big man playing at an All-Star level this year for the next 1.5 years and then his bird rights, as well as upgrading Johnson to Grant. Worth noting the pick is noted as being protected in MoTown's proposition as well.

Non-lottery 1st's really aren't that valuable, and this trade would make a big boost to your team. That's my honest 2 cents on it.

I'm fine with people feeling one way or another about a deal but I think you're going out of your way here to distort the facts of the deal.

I don’t think many people think Mirotic is a better defender than Robin Lopez for example. With guys like Tolliver and Moreland in the pistons and even Drummond that statement that Mirotic would become our best frontcourt defender is laughable sorry to say.
Despite all the bashing on SJ here (where I’m including myself) he is only 21 and already a good wing defender. It is all true that his horrible offense and lack of development are a big issue but he still has plenty potential and that is a commodity in the NBA.
The fact that Mirotic is not liked by his team mates to the point that he gets his teeth kicked in and the team sides with Porter, is relevant. You lose leverage when negotiating.
I guess we’ll need to wait and see what you end up getting for Mirotic
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 20,328
And1: 2,639
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#62 » by thesack12 » Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:07 pm

bstein14 wrote:Boban + Stanley for Danny Green makes a lot of sense for both teams on multiple levels. Green has under performed since getting that contract and Pop tried to trade for Stanley previously while SVG tried to sign Green as a FA. Boban wanted to stay in SA but Pop told him he'd be a fool to turn down the money from Detroit.


It could happen for the reasons you mention, but unless Bradley is being moved in another deal I just don't see the point from Detroit's side of things.

Even if you trade for Green with the intention of using him at SF, Bullock has been pretty damn solid since being inserted into the starting lineup, certainly better than Green has been for awhile. So Green likely is primary backup 3, which reduces the available minutes for Kennard.

Green has a player option for next year, and with his poor play for 2.5 seasons now I think there is a high liklelihood he exercises that option. So he wouldn't expire until next season, in which Boban does as well. So not much contractual incentive to do that deal either.

Boban will be easy to move starting in the offseason, and will actually hold some + value as an expiring.
tradez401
Veteran
Posts: 2,677
And1: 762
Joined: Jun 30, 2011
 

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#63 » by tradez401 » Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:36 pm

i've read somewhere the knicks should trade for stanley johnson if they do want him i'd do kyle oquinn for stanley.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#64 » by MotownMadness » Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:38 pm

tradez401 wrote:i've read somewhere the knicks should trade for stanley johnson if they do want him i'd do kyle oquinn for stanley.

I would rather have Willy H, He looked promising last year, on a rookie deal and wants out anyways cause Kanter stole his playing time.
tradez401
Veteran
Posts: 2,677
And1: 762
Joined: Jun 30, 2011
 

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#65 » by tradez401 » Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:43 pm

MotownMadness wrote:
tradez401 wrote:i've read somewhere the knicks should trade for stanley johnson if they do want him i'd do kyle oquinn for stanley.

I would rather have Willy H, He looked promising last year, on a rookie deal and wants out anyways cause Kanter stole his playing time.


yea true he doesnt look bad i like him
ChuckVanBrown
Senior
Posts: 656
And1: 352
Joined: Feb 24, 2016
     

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#66 » by ChuckVanBrown » Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:54 pm

On a side note, what happened with this draft class? Okafor, Hezonja, Mudiay and Russell are all looking like busts. Winslow had some unfortunate injuries, but he hasn’t set the world on fire either. Stanley definitely falls under these group of guys who just haven’t found their place in this league.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
Posts: 20,824
And1: 4,803
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#67 » by vege » Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:14 am

ChuckVanBrown wrote:On a side note, what happened with this draft class? Okafor, Hezonja, Mudiay and Russell are all looking like busts. Winslow had some unfortunate injuries, but he hasn’t set the world on fire either. Stanley definitely falls under these group of guys who just haven’t found their place in this league.


It was a 5 players draft with a lot of solid role players after them and a lot of the teams **** up their picks, us included.

Possible All-Stars

KAT - Porzingis - Booker - Turner - Russell

This are all ok players who will be in the league for a while

Rozier - Powell - Tyus Jones - Kaminsky - Willy H - Hollis-Jefferson - Cauley-Stein - Harrell - Josh Richardson - Holmes - Nance Jr - Delon Wright - Lyles - Portis
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#68 » by Blkbrd671 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 12:36 am

Part of SJ's problem is he still has his HS buddy as his main trainer. Idk if you watched the "WORK" videos but this guy seems like he has as much knowledge as a realgm poster when it comes to development. Judging by how SJ's jump shot seems to have actually gotten worst, seems about right.

*disclaimer: idk if that is his main trainer, but SJ indicates he was stoked that P3 let him come down .
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,257
And1: 5,245
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#69 » by Kilo » Mon Jan 15, 2018 12:11 pm

How long has Stanley been hurt? Could the hip flexor injury be impacting his shot?
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
DETermination
RealGM
Posts: 13,850
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
Location: Michigan
       

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#70 » by DETermination » Mon Jan 15, 2018 12:57 pm

I still have a little hope that Stanley can turn around, maybe if he spends the entire off season working on his jumper and finishing abillity instead of playing in the dumb drew league or that other league he was in where he scored like 90 points. He needs to really take his offseasons serious and stop messing around or else he could be out of the league.
Detroit vs Everybody
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,257
And1: 5,245
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#71 » by Kilo » Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:13 pm

DETermination wrote:I still have a little hope that Stanley can turn around, maybe if he spends the entire off season working on his jumper and finishing abillity instead of playing in the dumb drew league or that other league he was in where he scored like 90 points. He needs to really take his offseasons serious and stop messing around or else he could be out of the league.

He didn't play in the Drew, and OVO was one game I believe. He put in the work in the off-season back at P3 - re-worked his shot AGAIN. I think every year/off-season he's changed his shot, maybe that is the problem. Don't worry about it being pretty, as long as it goes in. Shawn Marion had an ugly shot - didn't matter.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
DETermination
RealGM
Posts: 13,850
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
Location: Michigan
       

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#72 » by DETermination » Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:16 pm

Kilo wrote:How long has Stanley been hurt? Could the hip flexor injury be impacting his shot?

It might be because he was shooting decent from three early in the season
Detroit vs Everybody
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 20,328
And1: 2,639
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#73 » by thesack12 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:37 pm

2.5 seasons in, and he's shown next to no promise offensively.

There is such a thing as holding on to a guy for too long, thus zapping his value and you get bupkis for him.
DETermination
RealGM
Posts: 13,850
And1: 6,818
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
Location: Michigan
       

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#74 » by DETermination » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:43 pm

Can't believe Stanley is only 21, I really don't want to give up on him yet even though he has been one of the worst offensive players Ive ever seen lol.
Detroit vs Everybody
thesack12
RealGM
Posts: 20,328
And1: 2,639
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Location: N DA NAP
     

Re: Stanley Johnson is bad. 

Post#75 » by thesack12 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:12 pm

DETermination wrote:Can't believe Stanley is only 21, I really don't want to give up on him yet even though he has been one of the worst offensive players Ive ever seen lol.


I know I'm in the minority, but I personally don't put a ton of stock into a players age when evaluating them as they are close to coming off their rookie contracts.

Every drafted player is young entering the league.

A player's minutes, role, and the good old eye test are what I look into most when evaluating.

While Stanley hasn't logged a ton of minutes, he has always played enough minutes to firmly stay in the rotation. While his role has certainly changed while in Detroit, he has plenty of experience playing with the 1's and with the 2's. He has not caught on and ran with any role he has been given, which is a lot of the reason why Stan changes it up with him often because he's trying to find a role where Stan fits in. As for the eye ball test, he's surely a solid defender but offensively he is a straight up liability.

Stanley has regressed not progressed.

I'm not scared or paranoid that he will flourish if/when he is moved. Mainly because its obviously not working here for the Pistons or Stanley. Detroit is justifiably looking for a better option, and Stanley is currently on track to wash out of the league.

Its best for Detroit to try and get some value for him, and its best for Stanley to receive a change of scenery clean slate.

Return to Detroit Pistons