What am I, infowars?
Seriously locking a thread for pointing out the Pistons are toast is absurd.
The mods on this board are almost as bad as SVG.
Locked last thread?!!
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Locked last thread?!!
-
- Junior
- Posts: 343
- And1: 124
- Joined: Oct 13, 2016
Re: Locked last thread?!!
-
- Junior
- Posts: 280
- And1: 118
- Joined: Jun 18, 2015
-
Re: Locked last thread?!!
Hey man Alex Jones is the best troll of all time.
Re: Locked last thread?!!
-
- Junior
- Posts: 343
- And1: 124
- Joined: Oct 13, 2016
Re: Locked last thread?!!
tcj61298 wrote:Hey man Alex Jones is the best troll of all time.
Im not knocking infowars, Im knocking the BS censorship imposed by these joker mods.
Make the pistons and this board great again!
Re: Locked last thread?!!
- Izzite
- Senior
- Posts: 555
- And1: 327
- Joined: Apr 21, 2016
- Location: Beast Lansing
-
Re: Locked last thread?!!
What makes you think what you said warranted a thread? You proclaiming to all that you’re done with this team doesnt need to clutter up the board.
Re: Locked last thread?!!
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,858
- And1: 2,442
- Joined: Feb 20, 2017
- Location: Bangkok
-
Re: Locked last thread?!!
Theirs multiple threads you could of posted the pistons were toast in that your post would of been on topic.
Also i think the moderators are completely fine here. I've posted tons of negative things about the Blake trade and the pistons future and they never censored anything i wrote.
Also i think the moderators are completely fine here. I've posted tons of negative things about the Blake trade and the pistons future and they never censored anything i wrote.
Re: Locked last thread?!!
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,332
- And1: 2,989
- Joined: Jul 02, 2009
-
Re: Locked last thread?!!
Because you decided to make a completely new thread just to announce that you're not watching the Pistons anymore, when in reality no one cares.
If you were "done", then why are you back?
If you were "done", then why are you back?
Re: Locked last thread?!!
- bballnmike
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,671
- And1: 1,531
- Joined: Jan 17, 2011
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
-
Re: Locked last thread?!!
Oh great, a pointless thread complaining about your last pointless thread. So much for watching from afar?

Re: Locked last thread?!!
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: Locked last thread?!!
The mod gave a reason for locking the thread. You barely ever post here, so you saying you're done really means nothing.
Additionally, you came back and made this thread. So, you obviously are still here.
Additionally, you came back and made this thread. So, you obviously are still here.

Re: Locked last thread?!!
- MrBigShot
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,541
- And1: 20,092
- Joined: Dec 18, 2010
-
Re: Locked last thread?!!
If I couldn't see your post count and you had posted an introduction thread instead of a goodybe I would've believed it. Its practically like the equivalent of if Eric Moreland were to announce his retirement on ESPN...and goodbyes usually just come across as attention seeking.
If anyone wants to leave/stop watching the team then they can, but nobody really cares. It's just a forum.
If anyone wants to leave/stop watching the team then they can, but nobody really cares. It's just a forum.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
Re: Locked last thread?!!
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 50,908
- And1: 18,049
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: Locked last thread?!!
I'm the guy who locked that first thread, and I've been completely negative about the Blake Griffin trade from the word go.
The thread wasn't censored because there was any issue with the point of view expressed. It was locked because it contained content that should have gone in a previously existing thread, not something that was unique or interesting enough for it's own thread. These are all things that were clearly stated in the thread when I locked it. It's probably best for you to read the forum to understand the norms of how it works, or at the very least actually read the post that explains why a thread was locked before accusing us of censorship.
Speaking of which...
The thread wasn't censored because there was any issue with the point of view expressed. It was locked because it contained content that should have gone in a previously existing thread, not something that was unique or interesting enough for it's own thread. These are all things that were clearly stated in the thread when I locked it. It's probably best for you to read the forum to understand the norms of how it works, or at the very least actually read the post that explains why a thread was locked before accusing us of censorship.
Speaking of which...