frothbrain wrote:crazy how pistons had the strongest frontcourt with blake and drummond and now start two twigs at pf and center.
Wood is better than Drummond. Size don’t matter in today’s NBA. Wood will dunk on people too. Drummond was soft.
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
frothbrain wrote:crazy how pistons had the strongest frontcourt with blake and drummond and now start two twigs at pf and center.
Han Solo wrote:jjaymes wrote:Yea I really hope we keep him. You think 2 years at 10 million per year gets it done? I'm not sure what he is worth to be honest. I assume we dont want to spend money more than 2 years out cuz Blake's deal will be gone by then.Han Solo wrote:We need to be careful with Wood’s contract next year. Be clear with him during the off-season. Tell him we want him to be a major piece going forward, but we need to not over pay here.
We love him because he’s over performing. But what happens when he’s making 12 million a year. We will be more critical of him.
His future with us is exciting but financially worrisome.
Will he keep getting better or is this his peak? He needs to keep working if we give him big money.
Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
My guess is either 3/30 or 3/36. Maybe the 3/30 (10 mil a year) is the better bet. I think he will want a three year deal. Won’t matter about the timing of Blake’s contract. Wood has never been paid. A three year deal seems right. 4 is too long in case he’s a future all star and not paid like it. And 2 years is too short after never really having security in the NBA. I think we give him a three year deal.
jakebernat wrote:“We’re not close to a bottom 5 record”
some people need a reality check.
jjaymes wrote:Han Solo wrote:jjaymes wrote:Yea I really hope we keep him. You think 2 years at 10 million per year gets it done? I'm not sure what he is worth to be honest. I assume we dont want to spend money more than 2 years out cuz Blake's deal will be gone by then.
Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
My guess is either 3/30 or 3/36. Maybe the 3/30 (10 mil a year) is the better bet. I think he will want a three year deal. Won’t matter about the timing of Blake’s contract. Wood has never been paid. A three year deal seems right. 4 is too long in case he’s a future all star and not paid like it. And 2 years is too short after never really having security in the NBA. I think we give him a three year deal.
Yea I would definitely be good with giving him 3/30. It's a relief that we will have money to throw at guys that still are young and show potential like Wood.
SamFlow wrote:jakebernat wrote:“We’re not close to a bottom 5 record”
some people need a reality check.
Seventh right now.
Knicks, Hawks, T'wolves I predict will overtake us in wins.
Which would make us 4th... which would give us a range of 1-7 for the draft.