flow wrote:Why would Weaver trade for Bagley when he could have signed Wood?
To waive and stretch a player, you must first have the player.
Bagley's just what we need... another puke from Duke.
If Bagley becomes available: Should we trade for him?
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Re: If Bagley becomes available: Should we trade for him?
-
Uncle Mxy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,511
- And1: 2,249
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
- Location: I plead the Fifth Dimension
Re: If Bagley becomes available: Should we trade for him?
To waive and stretch a player, you must first have the player.
Bagley's just what we need... another puke from Duke.
Re: If Bagley becomes available: Should we trade for him?
-
Pharaoh
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,443
- And1: 4,742
- Joined: Aug 10, 2001
Re: If Bagley becomes available: Should we trade for him?
Love this!
Sent from my SM-G781B using RealGM mobile app
flow wrote:Why would Weaver trade for Bagley when he could have signed Wood?
.
Sent from my SM-G781B using RealGM mobile app
Re: If Bagley becomes available: Should we trade for him?
-
Piston Pete
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,070
- And1: 1,352
- Joined: Feb 07, 2002
- Location: Way out in left field
Re: If Bagley becomes available: Should we trade for him?
It’s true though. Wood > Bagley