ImageImageImage

Bagley or M.Robinson

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,718
And1: 9,552
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#61 » by bstein14 » Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:21 pm

Piston Pete wrote:
Manocad wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:I don't think Mitchell or other offensively limited centers who do some combo of rim running, rim protection, and rebounding move the needle that much. We've got cap and it's scarce. Hopefully we leverage that.

That's why I don't think all analysis has to stop at THIS offseason, like next year has to be THE YEAR. As I've posted before, none of the choices relative to the draft, trades or free agency signings should be happening in a vacuum. The smart way to do it IMO is to consider all the options both this offseason and next offseason as well, then put together a list of coordinated moves. We've seen what happens when the moves are made in a "Just do this, then react" manner.


Assuming we have around $29 million in cap space…

Regardless of who we spend it on - let’s assume we spend it ALL - all $29 million.

We will still be in a position to be free agency players in the 2023 offseason.

Grant will come off our books.
Olynyk can come off our books (only $3 mil guar)
Hayes can come off our books (deline option?)

That’s potentially (ballpark) $37 million in cap relief for next offseason.


Grant wants an extension this summer so he wont be coming off the books he will be on them for more.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,936
And1: 15,105
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#62 » by Laimbeer » Mon Mar 14, 2022 10:48 pm

John Collins just signed an extension starting at 23M and rises gradually to 27M in 2026.

I don't think Grant is worth quite as much, certainly not more.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,070
And1: 1,352
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#63 » by Piston Pete » Mon Mar 14, 2022 11:56 pm

bjones521 wrote:Neither. Bagley will probably never be strong and good enough defensively to play the C but he doesn't shoot well enough to be a PF. Bagley would be a bigger Josh smith if he took more 3's. Robinson is terrible offensively but great defensively. Id rather meet in the middle and go with either Jalen Smith or Mo Bomba. Both good defensively and are willing shooters and should both get a lot of open shots playing next to Cade and possibly Chet, Paolo, Ivey or Smith


Jalen Smith is still my #1 FA target this offseason.

I think LaVine and Ayton are out of reach.
User avatar
whitehops
General Manager
Posts: 8,298
And1: 6,999
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#64 » by whitehops » Mon Mar 14, 2022 11:58 pm

i've said it in one of the FA threads but i really like robinson for this team. he's literally 100th percentile at finishing around the rim and 57% of his career field goals are dunks (2.5/game). he's an elite offensive rebounder and he's elite at blocking shots, though his overall defensive impact is closer to average for a starting center.

even just check this out, it's the cutups of his 4 field goal attempts from new york's last game.

he's got tons of size, is decently mobile and plays above the rim. i can't give a full scouting report on him but he's pretty close to what we wanted drummond to do: just use his size/athleticism and stick to his strengths.

if people want a lob threat for cade and hayes then THIS is your guy.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,258
And1: 9,743
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#65 » by tmorgan » Tue Mar 15, 2022 12:09 am

If we can move Olynyk for neutral value, or if we don’t keep Bagley, I’m down for Mitch. He brings energy.

I do kinda like Jalen Smith, though. Worth considering. I feel like Bamba is an enigma that will likely never be fully solved.
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 13,001
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#66 » by zeebneeb » Tue Mar 15, 2022 3:36 am

whitehops wrote:i've said it in one of the FA threads but i really like robinson for this team. he's literally 100th percentile at finishing around the rim and 57% of his career field goals are dunks (2.5/game). he's an elite offensive rebounder and he's elite at blocking shots, though his overall defensive impact is closer to average for a starting center.

even just check this out, it's the cutups of his 4 field goal attempts from new york's last game.

he's got tons of size, is decently mobile and plays above the rim. i can't give a full scouting report on him but he's pretty close to what we wanted drummond to do: just use his size/athleticism and stick to his strengths.

if people want a lob threat for cade and hayes then THIS is your guy.
Well said and ill add something important that everyone seems to be missing here;

Cade is the type of player that makes e eryone around him better.

Don't view Robinson as he plays on the Knicks, who don't have anyone even remotely close to Cade, or even a competent PG. Some players, especially bigmen, need a floor general to unlock them, as much as they will unlock the floor generals full game.

View how important Robison will be setting wall sized screens for Cade **** Cunningham.

That's how I'm viewing him next to Cade. Imagine giving Cade that much room.
User avatar
whitehops
General Manager
Posts: 8,298
And1: 6,999
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#67 » by whitehops » Tue Mar 15, 2022 3:54 am

zeebneeb wrote:Well said and ill add something important that everyone seems to be missing here;

Cade is the type of player that makes e eryone around him better.

Don't view Robinson as he plays on the Knicks, who don't have anyone even remotely close to Cade, or even a competent PG. Some players, especially bigmen, need a floor general to unlock them, as much as they will unlock the floor generals full game.

View how important Robison will be setting wall sized screens for Cade **** Cunningham.

That's how I'm viewing him next to Cade. Imagine giving Cade that much room.

yeah, he might average like 11 points a game instead of his current 8 but i wouldn't expect anything more than that or for robinson's skill set to change.

btw i did forget to mention the one thing i don't like about robinson and that's his terrible free throw shooting. after all those years of drummond being sub-50% from the line it's going to be annoying to have someone like that again. he only takes like 2 a game but it still opens yourself up to hack-a-shaq, like we did against mason plumlee this season.
User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,070
And1: 1,352
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#68 » by Piston Pete » Tue Mar 15, 2022 4:20 am

whitehops wrote:
zeebneeb wrote:Well said and ill add something important that everyone seems to be missing here;

Cade is the type of player that makes e eryone around him better.

Don't view Robinson as he plays on the Knicks, who don't have anyone even remotely close to Cade, or even a competent PG. Some players, especially bigmen, need a floor general to unlock them, as much as they will unlock the floor generals full game.

View how important Robison will be setting wall sized screens for Cade **** Cunningham.

That's how I'm viewing him next to Cade. Imagine giving Cade that much room.

yeah, he might average like 11 points a game instead of his current 8 but i wouldn't expect anything more than that or for robinson's skill set to change.

btw i did forget to mention the one thing i don't like about robinson and that's his terrible free throw shooting. after all those years of drummond being sub-50% from the line it's going to be annoying to have someone like that again. he only takes like 2 a game but it still opens yourself up to hack-a-shaq, like we did against mason plumlee this season.


Pretty minimal exposure to that if he’s gonna split time with Stewart.
User avatar
whitehops
General Manager
Posts: 8,298
And1: 6,999
Joined: Dec 12, 2012
Location: Toronto
     

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#69 » by whitehops » Tue Mar 15, 2022 4:32 am

Piston Pete wrote:Pretty minimal exposure to that if he’s gonna split time with Stewart.


yeah i know, but it's still a possibility situationally.

btw if we did sign robinson i think we'd start him but him and stewart would pretty much split minutes down the middle (24 each).
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,323
And1: 2,289
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Bagley or M.Robinson 

Post#70 » by Kalamazoo317 » Tue Mar 15, 2022 5:07 am

I'm team Bagley. I like what he's added to the team and I think he has good chemistry with the team. I think we can get him back for the 7.5 QO.

Return to Detroit Pistons