flow wrote:A_dub06 wrote:sludgefoot wrote:Kennard is not a 3 and no D. He's a 3, a 2, a passer, a good ball handler, a decent rebounder and will be a decent D. Man will be a solid solid player.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using
RealGM mobile app
This is wildly untrue.
Kennard is not a 3, he’s 6’6” with a 6’5” wingspan and abysmal athletically. The absolute best we can hope for on that end is that he’s an average team defender and below average on-ball defender. He’s a straight 2, can handle the ball a little and could become a Reddick light on offence but let’s take off the homer glasses and call a spade a spade.
Sent from my iPhone using
RealGM mobile app
I think you're short-changing Kennard. And I'm quite sure no one would accuse me of wearing homer glasses!
His potential is more dynamic than a Reddick light. Reddick is simply a 3-point sniper. Kennard can handle the ball comfortably and can run the team, and passes well. His court vision and bball iq are both high. He's not a straight 2. Nor is he abysmal athletically. He just has to be allowed to play.
Kennard can handle the ball but he hasn’t shown much in terms of “running a team” nor are his passes anything special. Kennard is a straight 2 at this point and while possessing a high iq, his athletic limitations severely limit his potential. The eye test shows that he doesn’t have quickness, speed or jumping ability, I don’t know how anyone can even think of him being average athletically. What he does have is some hesitation moves both off the dribbles and from a catch and shoot position but he’s still a poor finisher at the rim due to his poor length and athleticism.
To be clear I’m not at all saying he can’t become an asset to us offensively, I just think he will always be an issue defensively and that will directly affect his ability to become a major piece for us moving forward.
Sent from my iPhone using
RealGM mobile app