theBigLip wrote:From my friend ChatGPT
Well, I appreciate your honesty in noting that it's ChatGPT

LeBron: 6x All-Defensive. Defensive IQ was never an issue, needless to say. Odd claim by ChatGPT about his later years, because as time has gone on, he's preserved energy for offense in the regular season by gradually trying less and less on defense.
Wiggins: He's always had the defensive potential; IQ was never the issue. He was extremely lazy in Minnesota. He became a good defender in Golden State for about a year and a half because he started putting in the effort. Then he declined after the championship because he again stopped caring.
Tatum: Again, never a bad defender. He got better over time as he gained NBA seasoning, like most do, but I wouldn't say he's a great deal better now than he was in his third season in the league. And he's more just a plus defender than a "strong" defender, as ChatGPT puts it.
DeRozan: Maybe he improved in San Antonio; but if so, then not by much. He was still a minus defender with the Spurs, and he remained so in Chicago.
Harden: Like Wiggins -- though he's never had Wiggins' defensive ceiling -- it was all effort. He started trying at some point during his tenure in Houston and became passable rather than terrible.
It's also worth noting that none of these are centers. Centers have the toughest job defensively, and also the greatest defensive impact. It becomes clear pretty early if they're just awful on defense, and awful defense takes a huge bite out of their value. If they're strong offensively, then they can find value anyway, though almost invariably not on a championship level (only Jokic can really manage that, and he had a defense built around him). Duren isn't strong offensively, needless to say.