PF targets
Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33
Re: PF targets
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 51,274
- And1: 18,231
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: PF targets
“Face of the league” has become such a tired part of NBA discourse.
Re: PF targets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,791
- And1: 772
- Joined: Apr 17, 2016
Re: PF targets
Canadafan wrote:How great would it be to have Stew PJWashington Holland Beasley Shröder as our bench. Wowwww that's tough though.
Duren Tobias Ausar Ivey Cade starters dayammmm.
I hate to sound like a pedant, but where would the minutes come from for everybody? I understand the desire to pack as much talent into the roster as possible, but rotations are generally 8-9 (for what it's worth, JB ran eight in season 2-4 in Cleveland) so that everyone can get significant minutes. Players who are accustomed to significant roles, or who simply believe that they deserve those roles, generally don't take kindly to becoming depth players.
If Schroder and Beasley are back, then we're probably looking at something in the realm of this:
PG: Cade 34, Schroder 14
SG: Ivey 32, Schroder 6, Beasley 10
SF: Ausar 18, Holland 18, Beasley 12
PF: Tobias 32, Ausar 16
PJ has averaged upwards of 30 MPG across his career. The Pistons wouldn't be able to find even 20 for him without kicking Holland out of the rotation.
Re: PF targets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,912
- And1: 304
- Joined: Jul 05, 2005
- Location: G-Rap
Re: PF targets
Crymson wrote:Canadafan wrote:How great would it be to have Stew PJWashington Holland Beasley Shröder as our bench. Wowwww that's tough though.
Duren Tobias Ausar Ivey Cade starters dayammmm.
I hate to sound like a pedant, but where would the minutes come from for everybody? I understand the desire to pack as much talent into the roster as possible, but rotations are generally 8-9 (for what it's worth, JB ran eight in season 2-4 in Cleveland) so that everyone can get significant minutes. Players who are accustomed to significant roles, or who simply believe that they deserve those roles, generally don't take kindly to becoming depth players.
If Schroder and Beasley are back, then we're probably looking at something in the realm of this:
PG: Cade 34, Schroder 14
SG: Ivey 32, Schroder 6, Beasley 10
SF: Ausar 18, Holland 18, Beasley 12
PF: Tobias 32, Ausar 16
PJ has averaged upwards of 30 MPG across his career. The Pistons wouldn't be able to find even 20 for him without kicking Holland out of the rotation.
Start PJ and give him his 30, Tobias would be great off the bench. Holland can take those Shroder SG mins you have listed.
Give Cade some or those SF minutes so you can play him with Shroder/Beasley.
JB was playing 9-10 man rotation all season and we did great. Shifting that to an 8 man rotation hurt us in the playoffs, should have kept to what worked for us all year, playoffs or not. Carlisle going against the grain and going deep with the rotation is working like a charm, and I’d argue we are a better team top to bottom.
Re: PF targets
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,334
- And1: 2,294
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: PF targets
Indy goes 10 deep regularly and they seem to be doing OK
Re: PF targets
-
- Junior
- Posts: 280
- And1: 177
- Joined: May 16, 2009
- Location: Expect the unexpected.
Re: PF targets
Marc Stein is linking the Pistons to Naz Reid and Myles Turner. How do we feel about that?
I’m not sure of Reid’s fit next to Duren or Turner’s fit next to Stewart.
I’m not sure of Reid’s fit next to Duren or Turner’s fit next to Stewart.
"A moment later, the two of us were millions of miles up in outer space ..."
Re: PF targets
- GreekAlex
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,209
- And1: 1,819
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: PF targets
uncleoswald wrote:Marc Stein is linking the Pistons to Naz Reid and Myles Turner. How do we feel about that?
I’m not sure of Reid’s fit next to Duren or Turner’s fit next to Stewart.
Does he give any indication as to the path to acquiring them?
Re: PF targets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,911
- And1: 830
- Joined: Jun 02, 2016
-
Re: PF targets
uncleoswald wrote:Marc Stein is linking the Pistons to Naz Reid and Myles Turner. How do we feel about that?
I’m not sure of Reid’s fit next to Duren or Turner’s fit next to Stewart.
That's exactly it. Don't get comfortable with either Duren or Stewart lol
Re: PF targets
- zeebneeb
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,579
- And1: 13,106
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
-
Re: PF targets
Naz would be an amazing fit next to Duren. Absolutely ideal, save for JJJ, best in the league.uncleoswald wrote:Marc Stein is linking the Pistons to Naz Reid and Myles Turner. How do we feel about that?
I’m not sure of Reid’s fit next to Duren or Turner’s fit next to Stewart.
Turner would be great as well.
*edit* as a matter of fact, if Naz really wants to come here, because he would immediately start, Langdon needs to clear some space, and sign him to a nice fat contract. Adding a 25yo career 37% shooting, block a game, 6'9 265lbs PF trumps everything else.
His per 36?
19p/8r/3a/1s/1b
Yeah, get that DONE.
Re: PF targets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,912
- And1: 304
- Joined: Jul 05, 2005
- Location: G-Rap
Re: PF targets
I like the idea of Naz in general, but whenever I watch him he seems a bit slow and underwhelming on defense…seemed to have put up a dud in the playoffs.
Maybe if we did not have 2 centers already, he seems perfectly suited as a stretch 5 but questionable as a starting stretch 4.
If Trajan goes for it, I trust his judgement…would also prefer him over Myles Turner, but a little worried about the money required and ramifications on the rest of the roster to make it happen.
Again, wouldn't hate bringing him in, but it still seems a little risky. Maybe if we do it, we then flip Duren for the same type of PF we’ve been looking for per this thread.
Houston looking to deal their #10 pick…maybe that is Rasheer Flemming…Give them Duren for it, and they then move Sengun and pieces for Giannis??? (me pointing my fingers like Brian Windhorst right now)
Naz
Fleming
Ausar/Holland
Ivey
Cade
…that’s a damn good young nucleus…and allows us to worry less about Ausars non-shooting and surround Cade with more floor spacing.
Maybe if we did not have 2 centers already, he seems perfectly suited as a stretch 5 but questionable as a starting stretch 4.
If Trajan goes for it, I trust his judgement…would also prefer him over Myles Turner, but a little worried about the money required and ramifications on the rest of the roster to make it happen.
Again, wouldn't hate bringing him in, but it still seems a little risky. Maybe if we do it, we then flip Duren for the same type of PF we’ve been looking for per this thread.
Houston looking to deal their #10 pick…maybe that is Rasheer Flemming…Give them Duren for it, and they then move Sengun and pieces for Giannis??? (me pointing my fingers like Brian Windhorst right now)
Naz
Fleming
Ausar/Holland
Ivey
Cade
…that’s a damn good young nucleus…and allows us to worry less about Ausars non-shooting and surround Cade with more floor spacing.
Re: PF targets
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,129
- And1: 2,018
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
-
Re: PF targets
zeebneeb wrote:Naz would be an amazing fit next to Duren. Absolutely ideal, save for JJJ, best in the league.uncleoswald wrote:Marc Stein is linking the Pistons to Naz Reid and Myles Turner. How do we feel about that?
I’m not sure of Reid’s fit next to Duren or Turner’s fit next to Stewart.
Turner would be great as well.
*edit* as a matter of fact, if Naz really wants to come here, because he would immediately start, Langdon needs to clear some space, and sign him to a nice fat contract. Adding a 25yo career 37% shooting, block a game, 6'9 265lbs PF trumps everything else.
His per 36?
19p/8r/3a/1s/1b
Yeah, get that DONE.
How much u think he gets in 1st yr?
Re: PF targets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,911
- And1: 830
- Joined: Jun 02, 2016
-
Re: PF targets
Canadafan wrote:zeebneeb wrote:Naz would be an amazing fit next to Duren. Absolutely ideal, save for JJJ, best in the league.uncleoswald wrote:Marc Stein is linking the Pistons to Naz Reid and Myles Turner. How do we feel about that?
I’m not sure of Reid’s fit next to Duren or Turner’s fit next to Stewart.
Turner would be great as well.
*edit* as a matter of fact, if Naz really wants to come here, because he would immediately start, Langdon needs to clear some space, and sign him to a nice fat contract. Adding a 25yo career 37% shooting, block a game, 6'9 265lbs PF trumps everything else.
His per 36?
19p/8r/3a/1s/1b
Yeah, get that DONE.
How much u think he gets in 1st yr?
Atleast 25+
Re: PF targets
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,129
- And1: 2,018
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
-
Re: PF targets
LaSheed wrote:Canadafan wrote:zeebneeb wrote:Naz would be an amazing fit next to Duren. Absolutely ideal, save for JJJ, best in the league.
Turner would be great as well.
*edit* as a matter of fact, if Naz really wants to come here, because he would immediately start, Langdon needs to clear some space, and sign him to a nice fat contract. Adding a 25yo career 37% shooting, block a game, 6'9 265lbs PF trumps everything else.
His per 36?
19p/8r/3a/1s/1b
Yeah, get that DONE.
How much u think he gets in 1st yr?
Atleast 25+
Ooohhhhh a sign and trade for Fontecchio +Sasser plus all our 2nd rounders lol works out perfectly money wise!
Sorry Beasley, unfortunately you gotta take the Room exception lol.
Re: PF targets
- zeebneeb
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,579
- And1: 13,106
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
-
Re: PF targets
As answered, probably 25+, but with that said, it has to get done if he is going to truly be available. He is your prototypical modern PF, and would be ideal next to Duren.Canadafan wrote:zeebneeb wrote:Naz would be an amazing fit next to Duren. Absolutely ideal, save for JJJ, best in the league.uncleoswald wrote:Marc Stein is linking the Pistons to Naz Reid and Myles Turner. How do we feel about that?
I’m not sure of Reid’s fit next to Duren or Turner’s fit next to Stewart.
Turner would be great as well.
*edit* as a matter of fact, if Naz really wants to come here, because he would immediately start, Langdon needs to clear some space, and sign him to a nice fat contract. Adding a 25yo career 37% shooting, block a game, 6'9 265lbs PF trumps everything else.
His per 36?
19p/8r/3a/1s/1b
Yeah, get that DONE.
How much u think he gets in 1st yr?
I dont want to get all excited, as landing someone that would fit perfectly is rare(think Rasheed)but its even more so, as he's only 25.
Cade 23
Ivey 23
Ausar 22
Reed 25
Duren 21
At that point, ANY kind of bench is gonna be fine. It is exceedingly rare to have a complete, complimentary starting lineup be that young. I also firmly believe that the Pistons with that starting group, could immediately be put in the dark horse title contender camp. Experience, or lack thereof, would be their main enemy.
If enough pieces are shuffled, and the team can also hold onto a stout 6th man, well hell, who knows?
Re: PF targets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,911
- And1: 830
- Joined: Jun 02, 2016
-
Re: PF targets
zeebneeb wrote:As answered, probably 25+, but with that said, it has to get done if he is going to truly be available. He is your prototypical modern PF, and would be ideal next to Duren.Canadafan wrote:zeebneeb wrote:Naz would be an amazing fit next to Duren. Absolutely ideal, save for JJJ, best in the league.
Turner would be great as well.
*edit* as a matter of fact, if Naz really wants to come here, because he would immediately start, Langdon needs to clear some space, and sign him to a nice fat contract. Adding a 25yo career 37% shooting, block a game, 6'9 265lbs PF trumps everything else.
His per 36?
19p/8r/3a/1s/1b
Yeah, get that DONE.
How much u think he gets in 1st yr?
I dont want to get all excited, as landing someone that would fit perfectly is rare(think Rasheed)but its even more so, as he's only 25.
Cade 23
Ivey 23
Ausar 22
Reed 25
Duren 21
At that point, ANY kind of bench is gonna be fine. It is exceedingly rare to have a complete, complimentary starting lineup be that young. I also firmly believe that the Pistons with that starting group, could immediately be put in the dark horse title contender camp. Experience, or lack thereof, would be their main enemy.
If enough pieces are shuffled, and the team can also hold onto a stout 6th man, well hell, who knows?
Man I'm with you. Reid has been on my wishlist for 2 years+ now. Exciting to see our name attached but also not getting my hopes up.
Re: PF targets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,758
- And1: 22,819
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: PF targets
Reid is a nice fit but I’m assuming it takes a sign n trade
Re: PF targets
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,705
- And1: 1,388
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: PF targets
MotownMadness wrote:Reid is a nice fit but I’m assuming in takes a sign n trade
Sign and trade? If they asked for Holland, Tech, Sasser+multiple 2nds would you do it?
Re: PF targets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,758
- And1: 22,819
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: PF targets
Neptune wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Reid is a nice fit but I’m assuming in takes a sign n trade
Sign and trade? If they asked for Holland, Tech, Sasser+multiple 2nds would you do it?
Can you even do multiple players like that? I don’t even know if we have what they would want to take back.
Re: PF targets
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,705
- And1: 1,388
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: PF targets
MotownMadness wrote:Neptune wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Reid is a nice fit but I’m assuming in takes a sign n trade
Sign and trade? If they asked for Holland, Tech, Sasser+multiple 2nds would you do it?
Can you even do multiple players like that?
Of course they would provide fill-ins(likely players that would get cut). I'm just asking would you send Holland, Sasser and Tech+multiple 2nds
Re: PF targets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,758
- And1: 22,819
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: PF targets
Neptune wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Neptune wrote:Sign and trade? If they asked for Holland, Tech, Sasser+multiple 2nds would you do it?
Can you even do multiple players like that?
Of course they would provide fill-ins(likely players that would get cut). I'm just asking would you send Holland, Sasser and Tech+multiple 2nds
Basically that’s asking would I give up Holland for him.
I probably wouldn’t give up that kind of value in a sign n trade.
Re: PF targets
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,705
- And1: 1,388
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: PF targets
MotownMadness wrote:Neptune wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Can you even do multiple players like that?
Of course they would provide fill-ins(likely players that would get cut). I'm just asking would you send Holland, Sasser and Tech+multiple 2nds
Basically that’s asking would I give up Holland for him.
I probably wouldn’t give up that kind of value in a sign n trade.
I think the same. I have feeling they'll ask if this rumor is true though