ImageImageImage

Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect

Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33

mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2981 » by mattao313 » Thu Jun 16, 2022 6:40 am

buzzkilloton wrote:
mattao313 wrote:
buzzkilloton wrote:

This is why I wouldnt take Duren at 5 he plays center. To pay off value there is a speculative bet on him developing something special were not today seeing. Can that happen? Sure look at Keegan Murray who will be 22 in Aug compared to Durens whos 19 in Nov. big improvements can pop up in that amount of time. Likely he ends up more of a utility guy whos useful but more of a top 8-10 guy for me.
Exactly and even then I think mark Williams is the better player if you're looking for that skill set.

Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app


Well Duren could still develop into more on offense then Williams. He played in a bad system for him and hes pretty young. Again its speculative and that can burn you on these bigs but I can see the ceiling.

I like Williams as well. I prefer Duren but still I get why many like Williams better. Both would be nice if we got a extra pick imo.
Definitely if we got a second pick and got duren I'd be cool

Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app
Championships
User avatar
The Moose
General Manager
Posts: 9,291
And1: 5,259
Joined: Apr 18, 2012
Location: Australia
 

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2982 » by The Moose » Thu Jun 16, 2022 6:49 am

the difference offensively between guys like Rob Williams and just pure rim runners is the baseline of passing ability.
People see a big man who isnt a perimeter shooter and just skip to, "well I guess he's just a rim runner".
In doing so, many micro skills are being skipped over that play a pretty important part in the way modern nba offenses are run.





It's these ancillary skills that help separate guys like Mitchell Robinson (and imo Mark Williams) from guys like Rob Williams. Duren quite clearly to me falls more in line with the latter rather than the former.

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


If he's a legit DPOY candidate guy who can play as a modern style big , thats still worth a top 5 pick for me.
If he's an average defender things get a lot murkier especially with a lack of shooting. This is where Mark Williams falls for me. Williams doesn't stand out to me defensively outside of being huge and long and this is an issue.

I can understand the hesitation on centers and wanting to go in a more perimeter centric direction to an extent, but I think there is a little bit of a misconception about centers being not important anymore. Centers who can neither shoot the 3 nor play elite d are losing importance for sure, but elite defensive centers are still useful especially if they aren't non threats offensively.
Image
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2983 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 6:53 am

buzzkilloton wrote:
mattao313 wrote:
buzzkilloton wrote:

This is why I wouldnt take Duren at 5 he plays center. To pay off value there is a speculative bet on him developing something special were not today seeing. Can that happen? Sure look at Keegan Murray who will be 22 in Aug compared to Durens whos 19 in Nov. big improvements can pop up in that amount of time. Likely he ends up more of a utility guy whos useful but more of a top 8-10 guy for me.
Exactly and even then I think mark Williams is the better player if you're looking for that skill set.

Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app


Well Duren could still develop into more on offense then Williams. He played in a bad system for him and hes pretty young. Again its speculative and that can burn you on these bigs but I can see the ceiling.

I like Williams as well. I prefer Duren but still I get why many like Williams better. Both would be nice if we got a extra pick imo.


I like the ideas. I'm afraid Duren would have to become exceptional on offense to earn a big role on offense for some teams today. Maybe a few more than a few teams or more. And, he might need to be on a bad team to prove the skills enough for the teams to want to depend on him for it. I've never heard of him as a great shooter, but I guess he has every right to develop an ouside shot too, lol, why not? And then post moves will never go away completely, but on that in particular, he might have the hardest time earning the right to show it. I like the idea of a good passing center too and, that's part of Banchero's hype even if he just plays pf. Yao had the nicest looking mid-range, and that's probably still appreciated. A young center might set himself apart with a mid-range. Sorry if I'm talking too much lol. Duren's just a question mark. If we get him somehow, we might be having the same conversations in 2 or 3 years. :/
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2984 » by mattao313 » Thu Jun 16, 2022 7:12 am

The Moose wrote:the difference offensively between guys like Rob Williams and just pure rim runners is the baseline of passing ability.
People see a big man who isnt a perimeter shooter and just skip to, "well I guess he's just a rim runner".
In doing so, many micro skills are being skipped over that play a pretty important part in the way modern nba offenses are run.





It's these ancillary skills that help separate guys like Mitchell Robinson (and imo Mark Williams) from guys like Rob Williams. Duren quite clearly to me falls more in line with the latter rather than the former.

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


If he's a legit DPOY candidate guy who can play as a modern style big , thats still worth a top 5 pick for me.
If he's an average defender things get a lot murkier especially with a lack of shooting. This is where Mark Williams falls for me. Williams doesn't stand out to me defensively outside of being huge and long and this is an issue.

I can understand the hesitation on centers and wanting to go in a more perimeter centric direction to an extent, but I think there is a little bit of a misconception about centers being not important anymore. Centers who can neither shoot the 3 nor play elite d are losing importance for sure, but elite defensive centers are still useful especially if they aren't non threats offensively.


Centers of course still have a use even limited rim runners I just think teams and F.O's are starting to look at them as situational more than just fulltime starters. Robert Williams is a good player no doubt but he's also a guy his coach is quick to pull if the matchup isn't right. Look a Gobert the guy is a multiple time dpoy yet has problems on the perimeter yet they can't do the same because the guy cost a fortune. Like you said I don't think investing a ton into those type of guys is optimal.

Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app
Championships
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2985 » by mattao313 » Thu Jun 16, 2022 7:16 am

coolness wrote:
buzzkilloton wrote:
mattao313 wrote:Exactly and even then I think mark Williams is the better player if you're looking for that skill set.

Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app


Well Duren could still develop into more on offense then Williams. He played in a bad system for him and hes pretty young. Again its speculative and that can burn you on these bigs but I can see the ceiling.

I like Williams as well. I prefer Duren but still I get why many like Williams better. Both would be nice if we got a extra pick imo.


I like the ideas. I'm afraid Duren would have to become exceptional on offense to earn a big role on offense for some teams today. Maybe a few more than a few teams or more. And, he might need to be on a bad team to prove the skills enough for the teams to want to depend on him for it. I've never heard of him as a great shooter, but I guess he has every right to develop an ouside shot too, lol, why not? And then post moves will never go away completely, but on that in particular, he might have the hardest time earning the right to show it. I like the idea of a good passing center too and, that's part of Banchero's hype even if he just plays pf. Yao had the nicest looking mid-range, and that's probably still appreciated. A young center might set himself apart with a mid-range. Sorry if I'm talking too much lol. Duren's just a question mark. If we get him somehow, we might be having the same conversations in 2 or 3 years. :/
I honestly think Duren would probably be pretty good at what he does day one as in grabbing rebounds, lobs and blocking shots but after that pretty much stagnate as a player I guess kinda like Drummond did.

Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app
Championships
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2986 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 7:29 am

mattao313 wrote:
coolness wrote:
buzzkilloton wrote:
Well Duren could still develop into more on offense then Williams. He played in a bad system for him and hes pretty young. Again its speculative and that can burn you on these bigs but I can see the ceiling.

I like Williams as well. I prefer Duren but still I get why many like Williams better. Both would be nice if we got a extra pick imo.


I like the ideas. I'm afraid Duren would have to become exceptional on offense to earn a big role on offense for some teams today. Maybe a few more than a few teams or more. And, he might need to be on a bad team to prove the skills enough for the teams to want to depend on him for it. I've never heard of him as a great shooter, but I guess he has every right to develop an ouside shot too, lol, why not? And then post moves will never go away completely, but on that in particular, he might have the hardest time earning the right to show it. I like the idea of a good passing center too and, that's part of Banchero's hype even if he just plays pf. Yao had the nicest looking mid-range, and that's probably still appreciated. A young center might set himself apart with a mid-range. Sorry if I'm talking too much lol. Duren's just a question mark. If we get him somehow, we might be having the same conversations in 2 or 3 years. :/
I honestly think Duren would probably be pretty good at what he does day one as in grabbing rebounds, lobs and blocking shots but after that pretty much stagnate as a player I guess kinda like Drummond did.

Sent from my 5087Z using RealGM mobile app


Pretty good chance of that. Some people here including me thought Drummond should get the max, at the very least as his market value. Long time lapse and then this year he is still a historical level rebounder and people hardly ever compliment him and he accepted a min contract with Philly? Pretty sure a min. I'm still going with Drummond having value as a good role player, and maybe as a starter depending on the team.
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2987 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 10:56 am

More Mathurin/Cheerleader. Scroll on by? Maybe this whole distraction gets deleted by mods. I'm thinking that in a way I'll feel better if I post, and I won't be around to respond later today anyway. I mentioned I was on a stimulant earlier and I think that is making this way more interesting to me than it probably should be. Also, there is a certain apology if you actually read.

1. I know full well nobody knows or can know Mathurin or Cheerleader.
2. Manocad said "accident" in a way that I was getting into that's not the normal usage. He didn't trip or drop something, but I still believe it could be an accident understood in an impulse or airheaded way. And, it could have causes, but it's not like I can know those for sure, and I was talking all about what could be wrong with Mathurin to bring about the accident.
3. She shouldn't try to get a check even if she felt bad and cried later. I defended the idea of going after a check a little bit. Some people with "common sense" would tell her to, but I think it would be sleazy in the end to do that.
4. It reminded me of two things in my life. One as an adult in my 30's. :/ I didn't touch the chick's privates, but if you were there, you would've known it was weird. I don't think anything came out of it, but if it did, I would've felt unlucky, but still knew to be more careful. And, again, "accidents" can have causes, but I can't say for sure. Anyways, I hope I felt weirder than her.
5. The idea that you only care if it happens to your daughter if she cares shows A. you care B. you're practical in a certain way, BUT how the cheerleader felt and what Mathurin did are two separate things. Great if she didn't care, but you know.
6. "It wasn't her privates because it was IN BETWEEN her titties" is not how privates/boundaries work.
7. We should always keep in mind that in a general/oversimplified way, women are afraid of men. Sure doesn't always work out that way or consistently or whatever, but it's a thing.
8. Mathurin apologized. Great. Hopefully a good apology. He either admitted wrong the best he could and showed a little concern or went lame with it. And, we don't know if he ever heard back from that side, right? Who cares? Not our thing, right?
9. Still not gonna defend Mathurin as if I know he did nothing wrong and all I can say is I wouldn't be mad if we picked him at #5, but most would call it a reach understandably. A high-floor contributor is something, and I think we are all deep down or openly afraid of Sharpe. Everyone probably knows he's two years younger than Murray, so that is legit doubt against Murray.
10. I could see Larry David on Curb Your Enthusiasm touching a women between her breasts, and everyone being mad and he was just clueless somehow and then he argues with everyone about it. Great comedy if you somehow haven't seen it.
11. I know this post is weirder than "letting it go," but I said 2 (I think) regrettable things before. An apology is something. A forum makes an apology easy in a way. Throw me a bone if you can. I'll leave it be now unless something really unexpected comes up. I won't be "high" in a certain way later either. Not gonna blame mods if they think it's a bit more than a bit much.
El Chivo
Starter
Posts: 2,317
And1: 978
Joined: Jun 19, 2015
Location: Roma
       

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2988 » by El Chivo » Thu Jun 16, 2022 11:33 am

my ultimate board:

Smith
Holmgren
Ivey
Banchero
Murray

If Weaver picks Sharpe I suspend judgement, only who attended his pre-draft campaign knows.

trade down candidates: Mathurin, Johnny Davis, Mark Williams, Hardy.
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
User avatar
Manocad
RealGM
Posts: 69,969
And1: 10,562
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Middle Fingerton
Contact:
       

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2989 » by Manocad » Thu Jun 16, 2022 11:36 am

coolness wrote:
flow wrote:
coolness wrote:LOL, I did say it was "def wrong of Mathurin" in one of the early posts about it. I was going by looks like most people probs will. And, accidents ain't an excuse necessarily, but I would certainly feel for him if it was just an accident, as I've had some strange things I couldn't explain including blurting stuff out naughty or even wholesome for some reason. I think it's one of those things we gotta just man up and not do though by being alert and carrying respectful thoughts around. If I was giving him advice, I would tell him to somehow hold himself accountable. If this counts as mental masturbation or even bothering Manocad, then Idunno, I'll just try to post about basketball next time. I can't remember if I've done this before here. Again, I took a stimulant earlier and I'm assuming you didn't, so maybe I'm wrong for even going online now ha!


Don't worry yourself. Mental masturbation is what Manocad lives for. Regardless of the topic.


LOL, I do like the the fella and his posts though. I'm glad you were contradicting him too. Pure gangster. 8-)

It's a common defense mechanism. Sometimes people throw out a poor argument, it gets addressed as being a poor argument, they get embarrassed, and then they turn to calling the person who embarrassed them a jerk or similar.

But that's internet forums. To some people like me it's a form of mild entertainment. And to some it's an emotional roller coaster that causes them great consternation. I generally just laugh because watching people melt down over words on a screen is just funny to me.
Image
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2990 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 11:50 am

Manocad wrote:
coolness wrote:
flow wrote:
Don't worry yourself. Mental masturbation is what Manocad lives for. Regardless of the topic.


LOL, I do like the the fella and his posts though. I'm glad you were contradicting him too. Pure gangster. 8-)

It's a common defense mechanism. Sometimes people throw out a poor argument, it gets addressed as being a poor argument, they get embarrassed, and then they turn to calling the person who embarrassed them a jerk or similar.

But that's internet forums. To some people like me it's a form of mild entertainment. And to some it's an emotional roller coaster that causes them great consternation. I generally just laugh because watching people melt down over words on a screen is just funny to me.


Well, did anyone really melt down that we know of for sure? It was pretty much me writing novels, and feeling pretty good if you can believe me. You writing some short posts that I wished were longer. Flow wrote even less. And nobody else jumped in iirc. My only hard feeling (which didn't feel hard thanks to the impairment and maybe some luck and I'm usually just easygoing without trying) was that I was hoping for more on the conversation. It's just more interesting and important than basketball. I was hoping for more somehow even though it didn't really have to do with the draft, lol.

I hope nobody had hard feelings. I feel like I should say that there is something wrong with thinking it's funny if people are feeling twisted though. Even if laughing is a feeling/reaction. If I saw someone melt down on The Simpsons, I would laugh, but in real life, I don't like the idea. I'll try to be realistic that I could laugh at someone having a hard time unexpectedly though, because I'm a flawed and even hypocritical dude, but it ain't right, and I feel there have to be ways to avoid it. I don't think it happening on the internet changes anything, but it might feel different easily.

I guess disagreements about things more important than basketball can have implications/judging in a certain way or whatever, but I hope we don't like it if for some reason we can't get along at the moment.

Anyways, good morning.
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2991 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 11:59 am

El Chivo wrote:my ultimate board:

Smith
Holmgren
Ivey
Banchero
Murray

If Weaver picks Sharpe I suspend judgement, only who attended his pre-draft campaign knows.

trade down candidates: Mathurin, Johnny Davis, Mark Williams, Hardy.


I can't even consider Johnny Davis, because it seemed like everyone talking about the draft lost respect for him 2 or 3 months ago when he was ranked #5ish, I think. A lot. I'm not saying he changed in any way, but I rely on mocks/profiles and realgm posters exclusively. I've never heard anyone hype up his athleticism that I can remember though. I've never read anything bad about his brain or effort though. *shrug*
User avatar
Manocad
RealGM
Posts: 69,969
And1: 10,562
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Middle Fingerton
Contact:
       

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2992 » by Manocad » Thu Jun 16, 2022 12:21 pm

coolness wrote:
Manocad wrote:
coolness wrote:
LOL, I do like the the fella and his posts though. I'm glad you were contradicting him too. Pure gangster. 8-)

It's a common defense mechanism. Sometimes people throw out a poor argument, it gets addressed as being a poor argument, they get embarrassed, and then they turn to calling the person who embarrassed them a jerk or similar.

But that's internet forums. To some people like me it's a form of mild entertainment. And to some it's an emotional roller coaster that causes them great consternation. I generally just laugh because watching people melt down over words on a screen is just funny to me.


Well, did anyone really melt down that we know of for sure? It was pretty much me writing novels, and feeling pretty good if you can believe me. You writing some short posts that I wished were longer. Flow wrote even less. And nobody else jumped in iirc. My only hard feeling (which didn't feel hard thanks to the impairment and maybe some luck and I'm usually just easygoing without trying) was that I was hoping for more on the conversation. It's just more interesting and important than basketball. I was hoping for more somehow even though it didn't really have to do with the draft, lol.

I hope nobody had hard feelings. I feel like I should say that there is something wrong with thinking it's funny if people are feeling twisted though. Even if laughing is a feeling/reaction. If I saw someone melt down on The Simpsons, I would laugh, but in real life, I don't like the idea. I'll try to be realistic that I could laugh at someone having a hard time unexpectedly though, because I'm a flawed and even hypocritical dude, but it ain't right, and I feel there have to be ways to avoid it. I don't think it happening on the internet changes anything, but it might feel different easily.

I guess disagreements about things more important than basketball can have implications/judging in a certain way or whatever, but I hope we don't like it if for some reason we can't get along at the moment.

Anyways, good morning.

Nobody should have any hard feelings; it's words on a screen. But you see how quickly some people turn to insults when they're embarrassed about making a poor argument. And trust me, there ARE people here who melt down simply because people counter their argument. It's an insecurity thing; they're looking for validation by putting an argument out there and hoping everyone agrees with them and gives them a big pat on the back. And if you disagree, especially if you have a really sound counterargument, sometimes these people get pissy and turn to the insults, as flow did. Which I find funny.

For the record, mental masturbation is basically waaaaaaay overthinking/overspeaking something (making a mental mountain out of a molehill) for the sake of pointless conversation. To me the Mathurin thing was simple--a video comes out that looks like an inadvertent brush of fingertips against the middle of a dancer's chest, people in our "woke" society start hollering "WTF is that all about?" on social media, as a response Mathurin/Arizona reached out to the TCU athletic department in an effort to get in touch with the dancer and offer an apology, and neither TCU nor the dancer responded. Done. Dead issue. Creating all these potential intentions, scenarios, outcomes, etc. to fit a narrative is the mental masturbation part. As I like to say, this isn't Occam's razor. More often than not the obvious answer is the answer.
Image
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2993 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 1:42 pm

Manocad wrote:
coolness wrote:
Manocad wrote:It's a common defense mechanism. Sometimes people throw out a poor argument, it gets addressed as being a poor argument, they get embarrassed, and then they turn to calling the person who embarrassed them a jerk or similar.

But that's internet forums. To some people like me it's a form of mild entertainment. And to some it's an emotional roller coaster that causes them great consternation. I generally just laugh because watching people melt down over words on a screen is just funny to me.


Well, did anyone really melt down that we know of for sure? It was pretty much me writing novels, and feeling pretty good if you can believe me. You writing some short posts that I wished were longer. Flow wrote even less. And nobody else jumped in iirc. My only hard feeling (which didn't feel hard thanks to the impairment and maybe some luck and I'm usually just easygoing without trying) was that I was hoping for more on the conversation. It's just more interesting and important than basketball. I was hoping for more somehow even though it didn't really have to do with the draft, lol.

I hope nobody had hard feelings. I feel like I should say that there is something wrong with thinking it's funny if people are feeling twisted though. Even if laughing is a feeling/reaction. If I saw someone melt down on The Simpsons, I would laugh, but in real life, I don't like the idea. I'll try to be realistic that I could laugh at someone having a hard time unexpectedly though, because I'm a flawed and even hypocritical dude, but it ain't right, and I feel there have to be ways to avoid it. I don't think it happening on the internet changes anything, but it might feel different easily.

I guess disagreements about things more important than basketball can have implications/judging in a certain way or whatever, but I hope we don't like it if for some reason we can't get along at the moment.

Anyways, good morning.

Nobody should have any hard feelings; it's words on a screen. But you see how quickly some people turn to insults when they're embarrassed about making a poor argument. And trust me, there ARE people here who melt down simply because people counter their argument. It's an insecurity thing; they're looking for validation by putting an argument out there and hoping everyone agrees with them and gives them a big pat on the back. And if you disagree, especially if you have a really sound counterargument, sometimes these people get pissy and turn to the insults, as flow did. Which I find funny.

For the record, mental masturbation is basically waaaaaaay overthinking/overspeaking something (making a mental mountain out of a molehill) for the sake of pointless conversation. To me the Mathurin thing was simple--a video comes out that looks like an inadvertent brush of fingertips against the middle of a dancer's chest, people in our "woke" society start hollering "WTF is that all about?" on social media, as a response Mathurin/Arizona reached out to the TCU athletic department in an effort to get in touch with the dancer and offer an apology, and neither TCU nor the dancer responded. Done. Dead issue. Creating all these potential intentions, scenarios, outcomes, etc. to fit a narrative is the mental masturbation part. As I like to say, this isn't Occam's razor. More often than not the obvious answer is the answer.


Yea, I know I've heard 'mental masturbation' but maybe only once, and def never used it. So, I went back to think about it a few times. Like masturbation is a solo act, so I was mental masturbating, but still legit trying to engage and hoping for more responses. Or that masturbation is pointless??? Idunno, I just like discussions about things deeper than basketball, and somehow wanted that from realgm, lol. Maybe masturbation can be tedious?? I was trying to flesh out every possible thought. It wasn't very deep but somewhat deep and could've led to other interesting topics which would've been a much bigger and blatant off-topic violation lol, and I couldn't stop thinking about stuff. When my friend left last night, we were having great conversations and then I was left with myself and the internet after taking speed, lol. I don't know what you thought before you said 'mental masturbation', but I figured I didn't have to take it bad in this case, and I could still know I'm a sinner and stuff.

"Occam's Razor" is rad. I don't think in terms of it and don't talk about it. Maybe because I'm not science-minded. With the cheerleader/Mathurin thing, my guess is that it was weird and did no harm or temporary small harm. But, I see it as a guess. I could see how maybe, I would feel disrespected (as myself somedays not as a cheerleader, hehe) and then never talk about it again to anyone and nobody would know. *shrug*

Yea, just gotta appreciate what you're saying about internet interactions. I think we should always look at it like we're capable of the same reactions we see get out of hand, and that along with a little intention and luck is our best chance to not get into those entanglements and say regrettable things. It's weird that it can even happen talking basketball. Go to one website and it's about abortion or something, and then _____. *shrug*

Last night was the first time I heard of Mathurin/Cheerleader. Was it a big deal in some places? I know people who might go hard against Mathurin for it. Strangely, some people with those ideas might not wanna hold a black man to high standards out of some weirdness/complication. And, I hate even mentioning race, because it makes me question if I care about myself. In a way, it's in nobody's self-interest to mention race ever, lol. I heard a guy say that and thought he sounded like a douche, but I'm guessing he's more of a "winner" than me. I tried to incorporate the ideas I associate with them ("feminists" or whatever) , and tried to balance it, but still regretted some words. I kept thinking about a couple things from my life. I thought about a guy I used to be tight with, who's handsome and has a bunch of swag/charisma and "knows how to act" around men and women both, and makes women wanna please him and makes way more money than I ever knew bartenders could make.....and all that to tell you, he grabbed a lot of women's breasts when they sat down at the bar and afaik, got away with it every time. A bar chick is very likely to just react with laughter, but that doesn't make it right in my mind. Laughing and whatever is easy and fast and then the tit-grabbin is over. :/ I don't like that, but never called him on it in the bar. Would've been hard and weird to call him on it when he's like a local celebrity or whatever, his family owned the place, the girls and guys all liked him, and I was there to drink, not be the squeaky wheel and probably end up leaving because of it. I'm definitely not jealous of him with the ladies though. If I went on talking about him, I could make it sound like he doesn't have it as good with the ladies since he's gotten older.


Man, Idunno how off-track I'm getting. I feel bad for any younger posters if they're at risk for screwing up bad with the girls/women. They don't need an opinion on Mathurin. But, be careful as you can think of with girls/women, and come up with ideas to be respectful and careful, and don't be surprised if you're crazy thoughts influence your actions later unexpectedly. And believe that women fear men in some way. If they don't say they do or act like they do, they still can under the surface, and they can't even change it. Never admire the dudes who are so cool by how much they can get away with. Those guys DON'T have it good in any meaningful way. Their lives suck really soon after everyone else becomes an adult.

Never do speed, lol. I feel bad for mentioning casually when younger dudes could be here. I don't think they wanna be like me, lol, I'm not the coolest, but I don't wanna be responsible for them seeing it as normal/casual. Usually people have an rx and don't call it speed. *shrug* There are more than a few good reasons not to. Google, I guess. I have two old, good friends who got entangled with it and they say emphatically not to. I did it the 3rd time last night. And decided never again. The other two times two months ago. Middle-aged dude "experimenting" lol, so not cool. If someone says it gives energy, yea a tiny bit, but the energy doesn't go where you want it to. You pretty much get less done, and your slight peppiness goes to wastes of time more likely. You'll very likely get less studying or errands done. Does NOT "sharpen you between the ears." Not dumb, easy mistakes the same way that weed and alcohol do, but the difference is you talk more (or type more) a lot more while thinking at the same old speed, and that can cause some easy mistakes and also you can unexpectedly lose your train of thought. And, it doesn't feel intense anywhere near alcohol or weed, so if you wanna be dumb and get lit, you wouldn't even want to try it.

LOL, I just felt guilty before that I could technically have lied in Mathurin posts, and now I'm afraid I'm a bad influence. I don't know anything about the age range here. :/
NYPiston
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,767
And1: 4,311
Joined: Jun 21, 2019
       

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2994 » by NYPiston » Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:18 pm

Christ, can you guys take your argument elsewhere and leave this thread for real draft talk? I can't speak for everybody, but I'm sure most posters here don't want to wade through pages of this nonsense to find actual meaningful discussion. Maybe use the OT thread and leave this for draft talk.
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,333
And1: 2,294
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2995 » by Kalamazoo317 » Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:33 pm

NYPiston wrote:Christ, can you guys take your argument elsewhere and leave this thread for real draft talk? I can't speak for everybody, but I'm sure most posters here don't want to wade through pages of this nonsense to find actual meaningful discussion. Maybe use the OT thread and leave this for draft talk.


I feel like honing the ability to scroll past nonsense is an essential part of forum life. :P
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2996 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:37 pm

NYPiston wrote:Christ, can you guys take your argument elsewhere and leave this thread for real draft talk? I can't speak for everybody, but I'm sure most posters here don't want to wade through pages of this nonsense to find actual meaningful discussion. Maybe use the OT thread and leave this for draft talk.


LOL, I know you're right. My best guess is it's done. I hope so, but I won't ignore Manocad if it's worthwhile somehow. *shrug* I don't see it though. I think people are gonna scroll by unless they want to witness some drama, which doesn't have to be a bad thing. AFAIK, nobody is arguing anymore.

It all started with Mathurin. If it was a bigger deal, there would be a big old weird thread probably on General Board.

In a certain way, "high-floor low-ceiling" Mathurin makes a ton of sense at #5. Two years younger than Murray was the last thing I said about it. Checks a lot of boxes. Was relied on in pretty much every way in college. Was a tad shorter than people thought at testing. I don't think he projects to be bad at anything. I don't remember ever coming across criticisms that were actually criticisms. Still gonna read anyone else's takes.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,756
And1: 22,819
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2997 » by MotownMadness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:39 pm

Coolness is on Addys staying up arguing with Manocad :lol:
NYPiston
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,767
And1: 4,311
Joined: Jun 21, 2019
       

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2998 » by NYPiston » Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:42 pm

MotownMadness wrote:Coolness is on Addys staying up arguing with Manocad :lol:


I think Addys are a necessity in any argument with Manocad :wink:
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#2999 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:46 pm

MotownMadness wrote:Coolness is on Addys staying up arguing with Manocad :lol:


LOL, I'm pretty sure he slept and then we met up again to talk over that important draft stuff.

Haven't seen AJ Griffin mocked high in a while. Supposedly his best thing was defense in spite of his great 3pt% as a freshman.
Also, 6'6" and I always see him as just a small forward. Did they determine he's just too small-forwardy or something? I don't understand that, but I guess in 2022 in the NBA you can be 6'3" and be a sf. I'm not convinced there is any reason, but if anyone wants to drop any knowledge on AJ, that would hit the spot.
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: Your 2022 NBA Draft Prospect 

Post#3000 » by coolness » Thu Jun 16, 2022 2:53 pm

NYPiston wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:Coolness is on Addys staying up arguing with Manocad :lol:


I think Addys are a necessity in any argument with Manocad :wink:


If you're talking Addys, then you read my heart-felt posts where I tackled the issues, lol.

Legit question: why is Tari Eason always (I think always, right?) significantly lower than Keegan Murray in the mocks? Tari is a year younger, and if he actually stayed in NCAA another year, his trajectory could be Keegan's numbers, and if that's saying too much, doesn't everyone hype Tari's defense while saying Keegan has limited defensive potential?

Return to Detroit Pistons