dVs33 wrote:Beasley struggled in the playoffs, but I don't think the team gets there without him, so he has to come back imo.
Agreed. He was the team's second most important player on offense, without a doubt.
Ivey coming back makes Schroeder slightly less important, but I would still like to bring him back.
Obviously that all depends on contract numbers, but if it's feasible, bring those 2 back.
Ivey isn't ideal as a lead handler, and having him be the backup handler means staggering him and Cade a lot of the time rather than allowing them to play together as much as possible.
The Pistons looked a lot better with Schroder leading the second unit than with Ivey.
theBigLip wrote:We also have no tradeable contracts except Font. Signing all of Beasley, Schroeder and THJ, if done at the right price and length, gives us some salaries to use in a trade. As for playing time and blocking the development of our youngsters, that’s up to the coach. Also up to Ausar, Ivey and Holland. Need to prove yourself at some point, especially Ivey since he’s been around the longest.
I feel like this minutes spread wouldn't block development at all:
PG: Cade 32, Schroder 16
SG: Ivey 30, Beasley 10, Schroder 8
SF: Ausar 14, Holland 20, Beasley 14
PF: Tobias 32, Ausar 16
C: Whatever
Once again not having a viable secondary lead handler, however, could be (once again) bad for development, because the offense is likely to once again die with Cade off the floor... and goodness forbid Cade himself is out of the lineup, because it would then have no viable lead handler at all.