dVs33 wrote:Snakebites wrote:We are on the hook cap-wise for the whole amount here.
If we were able to get a deal that even slightly removed that cap obligation we'd have done it. If the Kings truly offered that deal in the offseason and we turned it down, it's fairly obvious we waited too long to trade him.
Call it SVG's first major blunder of his tenure (though Meeks might have been that too, hard to say).
It's discouraging, but I'm still thrilled on a personal level that I never have to watch Josh Smith on my team again.
I'm guessing the kings offer wasn't as good as reported. The fact that SVG/Gores are happy to eat that salary means it must have been very hard to trade Smith for anything of use.
I disagree with this. I would bet the trade was there in the summer- last year a lot of people blamed SMiht's poor performance on playing out of position. However, this season he looked worse than ever and was playing his natural position. Smiths trade value likely plummetted even further this season than it was last season.