ImageImageImage

Run it Back or Upgrade?

Moderators: theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33, Cowology

Run it Back (No major changes) or Big Upgrade (Star search)

Run it Back
26
53%
Big Upgrade
23
47%
 
Total votes: 49

bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,554
And1: 9,460
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#61 » by bstein14 » Fri May 2, 2025 11:04 pm

It's expected that the NBA will announce ALL-NBA teams next week sometime so that will give us a final determination on our cap space.

I'm guessing its most likely that we will having to pay Cade 30% of the cap starting out which is projected to be $155 so 30% of that is $46.5 million starting out.... it would be $38.75 million if Cade didn't make All-NBA. This $8 million difference I believe will be the difference between having the ability to have $26 million in cap space or just $18 million in cap space. If we do use cap space, we have to renounce all our FAs.... we could then use all $18 million in cap space and go beyond the salary cap with a room exception ($8.8 estimate) and then even the bi-annual exception as well which is about $5 million.

So if Beasley would take $8.8 and Schroeder $5 million and THJ the Vet minimum we could go back out there and sign someone like Naz Reid for $18 million and keep everyone. Obviously that's not very realistic at all.
User avatar
GreekAlex
Analyst
Posts: 3,142
And1: 1,766
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#62 » by GreekAlex » Fri May 2, 2025 11:11 pm

bstein14 wrote:It's expected that the NBA will announce ALL-NBA teams next week sometime so that will give us a final determination on our cap space.

I'm guessing its most likely that we will having to pay Cade 30% of the cap starting out which is projected to be $155 so 30% of that is $46.5 million starting out.... it would be $38.75 million if Cade didn't make All-NBA. This $8 million difference I believe will be the difference between having the ability to have $26 million in cap space or just $18 million in cap space. If we do use cap space, we have to renounce all our FAs.... we could then use all $18 million in cap space and go beyond the salary cap with a room exception ($8.8 estimate) and then even the bi-annual exception as well which is about $5 million.

So if Beasley would take $8.8 and Schroeder $5 million and THJ the Vet minimum we could go back out there and sign someone like Naz Reid for $18 million and keep everyone. Obviously that's not very realistic at all.


Those numbers help put things in perspective.

I don’t want to overpay our vets but I don’t think we’ll get as much value trying to play the market with $18M and some exceptions.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,554
And1: 9,460
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#63 » by bstein14 » Fri May 2, 2025 11:20 pm

GreekAlex wrote:
bstein14 wrote:It's expected that the NBA will announce ALL-NBA teams next week sometime so that will give us a final determination on our cap space.

I'm guessing its most likely that we will having to pay Cade 30% of the cap starting out which is projected to be $155 so 30% of that is $46.5 million starting out.... it would be $38.75 million if Cade didn't make All-NBA. This $8 million difference I believe will be the difference between having the ability to have $26 million in cap space or just $18 million in cap space. If we do use cap space, we have to renounce all our FAs.... we could then use all $18 million in cap space and go beyond the salary cap with a room exception ($8.8 estimate) and then even the bi-annual exception as well which is about $5 million.

So if Beasley would take $8.8 and Schroeder $5 million and THJ the Vet minimum we could go back out there and sign someone like Naz Reid for $18 million and keep everyone. Obviously that's not very realistic at all.


Those numbers help put things in perspective.

I don’t want to overpay our vets but I don’t think we’ll get as much value trying to play the market with $18M and some exceptions.


$18 million cap space plus room exception and BAE if we want to go the route of having cap space but then no Beasley, THJ, or Schroeder.

Keep our guys and just resign them and never have cap space and then we get access to the MLE which is higher than the room exception. This seems like the best option unless there is something we really want with that $18 million cap space.

It's also pretty likely we'd have no problem trading our 2nd rounder plus Font into someone else's cap space if we wanted to create $25+ million for some reason, but once again I can't see why we'd want that much space at the moment.
User avatar
GreekAlex
Analyst
Posts: 3,142
And1: 1,766
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#64 » by GreekAlex » Fri May 2, 2025 11:29 pm

bstein14 wrote:
GreekAlex wrote:
bstein14 wrote:It's expected that the NBA will announce ALL-NBA teams next week sometime so that will give us a final determination on our cap space.

I'm guessing its most likely that we will having to pay Cade 30% of the cap starting out which is projected to be $155 so 30% of that is $46.5 million starting out.... it would be $38.75 million if Cade didn't make All-NBA. This $8 million difference I believe will be the difference between having the ability to have $26 million in cap space or just $18 million in cap space. If we do use cap space, we have to renounce all our FAs.... we could then use all $18 million in cap space and go beyond the salary cap with a room exception ($8.8 estimate) and then even the bi-annual exception as well which is about $5 million.

So if Beasley would take $8.8 and Schroeder $5 million and THJ the Vet minimum we could go back out there and sign someone like Naz Reid for $18 million and keep everyone. Obviously that's not very realistic at all.


Those numbers help put things in perspective.

I don’t want to overpay our vets but I don’t think we’ll get as much value trying to play the market with $18M and some exceptions.


$18 million cap space plus room exception and BAE if we want to go the route of having cap space but then no Beasley, THJ, or Schroeder.

Keep our guys and just resign them and never have cap space and then we get access to the MLE which is higher than the room exception. This seems like the best option unless there is something we really want with that $18 million cap space.

It's also pretty likely we'd have no problem trading our 2nd rounder plus Font into someone else's cap space if we wanted to create $25+ million for some reason, but once again I can't see why we'd want that much space at the moment.


I definitely think resigning our vets is the way to go.

If any opportunity arises at the deadline, it will allow us to have matching salary pieces.

I wouldn’t feel terrible about trading THJ & Schröder if a good fit became available.

That flexibility will be really valuable as well.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,690
And1: 12,354
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#65 » by BadMofoPimp » Fri May 2, 2025 11:52 pm

This is the first time I truly enjoyed the Pistons in almost 20 years. The way Free Agents been getting money, would be extremely hard to get a top tier talent then be stuck with G-leagers off the bench because cannot afford better. I would rather have a full depth team of vets/young and run it back. Once the Pistons improve in the next 2 plus years be patient and find your next Sheeeed. Making a major move now would be more panic mode than team building.

As far as THJ, if he is kept at all, definitely for something small, but I would offer Malik the MLE and find a way to get Schroder $8-10 mil. Maybe package Fontecchio with some future 2nds for a better talent. If a real good PF becomes available, then Ivey and picks for a better fit.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Rip32
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,447
And1: 284
Joined: Nov 09, 2002

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#66 » by Rip32 » Sat May 3, 2025 12:05 am

MrBigShot wrote:
ComboGuardCity wrote:Beasley had an out of this world anomaly of a season. We cannot rely on him to repeat what he did in the regular season next year. Hopefully our young guys take another leap but I think we also need to go out and get more explosive talent.


I agree. I think this was a clear outlier season from him.

I absolutely do NOT want Jaren Jackson Jr. He has been ATROCIOUS every time he's been in the playoffs, cant rebound to save his life and is up for a super max extension assuming he makes all nba.

If he makes all nba then he's a damn good player :nod:
Image

:nod: DETROIT VS EVERYBODY :nod:

I have no love for rogue moderators who abuse their authority

The Messiah needs a spacer to be great :noway:
pistons4ever
Junior
Posts: 387
And1: 137
Joined: Jul 03, 2016
         

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#67 » by pistons4ever » Sat May 3, 2025 12:34 am

Boston will try too shed salary

Simone and sasser for Holiday

Some picks (2 First and 2 Seconds)for the Most talented young forward (eason, sochan, Smith,Murray? In his rookie contract)

Beasley after free agency with the mle

Duren/Stew/Reed
New/Harris/Klintman
Thompson/Holland /picknr 37 of raptors
Ivey/Beasley
Cade/Holiday/Minimum veteran

Nice 10 men rotation
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,972
And1: 1,941
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#68 » by Canadafan » Sat May 3, 2025 12:37 am

Fennis Dembo wrote:This was a fun run. Cade needs a legit #2 for us to move forward. I hope Ivey comes back to be good but you can't bet on that.


https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJIZ8fxx7ce/?igsh=MXhrcG5maWpuNzR6bA==

I have high hopes for Ivey after seeing this video of Hutch. Hutches injury was much worse than iveys
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,268
And1: 3,816
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#69 » by Mr Peanut » Sat May 3, 2025 2:09 am

I think Trajan largely runs it back this offseason with small moves around the edges. If we don't make a jump next season and things are looking a bit stagnant coming up to the deadline, I can see him packaging expirings like Tobias/Fontecchio, 1-2 young guys and picks for a star.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,972
And1: 1,941
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#70 » by Canadafan » Sat May 3, 2025 11:51 am

bstein14 wrote:I don't think its realistic at all for us to add a borderline all-star.

I think it's we either like the 3 FAs we have and we pay them, or we end up waiving their rights and go after someone else with our $25 million of cap space and then maybe bring back one of those guys with the room exception and maybe even one at the vet min.


Soooo, we try to poach Naz Reid with our $25mill
And hope Shröder takes our $7mil exception
Beasley wants to get paid more so we'd lose him. Sasser and Shröder backing up Ivey and Cade.
Orrrrr, we sign Shröder and Beasley with our $25mil since they both want more than the $7mil. Then give the $7mil to Hardaway. Then make a trade before the deadline
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,972
And1: 1,941
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#71 » by Canadafan » Sat May 3, 2025 1:11 pm

ComboGuardCity wrote:
GreekAlex wrote:
ComboGuardCity wrote:I think signing Naz Reid is in the cards. He can play the 4 and is very switchable. He also makes Duren expendable if there is an upgrade somewhere else to be had


Naz Reid has a Player Option for $14M

How do we pay him $20M+ w/o cap space?

If we only intend to bring back Malik, I’m pretty sure we can pay him the MLE and give Reid 20-25million


Maybe I'm the only one not understanding the cap situation buttttt I though we either have roughly 25mil cap space plus the non-tax exception (exemption? Lol) of roughly 7mil.
-or-
The MLE of roughly $15mil and cap holds/rights? of THJR Shröder Beasley or somethin like that
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,972
And1: 1,941
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#72 » by Canadafan » Sat May 3, 2025 1:27 pm

bstein14 wrote:
[/b] If we do use cap space, we have to renounce all our FAs.... we could then use all $18 million in cap space and go beyond the salary cap with a room exception ($8.8 estimate) and then even the bi-annual exception as well which is about $5 million.

So if Beasley would take $8.8 and Schroeder $5 million and THJ the Vet minimum we could go back out there and sign someone like Naz Reid for $18 million and keep everyone. Obviously that's not very realistic at all.


Ok, so last time I'll ask(hopefully)
What's the alternative to the above situation?
We don't renounce our free agents?
So can we keep them on any type of contract? And then have the roughly $15MLE after that?

You said"$18 million cap space plus room exception and BAE if we want to go the route of having cap space but then no Beasley, THJ, or Schroeder."
If we go cap space route, that means we can't re-sign our 3 vets? Because in another post you said we can use our cap space to sign them. Very confused. I blame the Canadian school system :lol:
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,972
And1: 1,941
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#73 » by Canadafan » Sat May 3, 2025 1:34 pm

GreekAlex wrote:
bstein14 wrote:
GreekAlex wrote:

I definitely think resigning our vets is the way to go.

If any opportunity arises at the deadline, it will allow us to have matching salary pieces.

I wouldn’t feel terrible about trading THJ & Schröder if a good fit became available.

That flexibility will be really valuable as well.


This is my hope as well. We run it back with same guys and then have lots of options to bring in a future piece to add to our core4 of Cade Ivey Ausar Duren

Shröder Tobias Beasley THJr will all be on short term deals and together with draft picks could bring in somethin nice
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,972
And1: 1,941
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#74 » by Canadafan » Sat May 3, 2025 1:52 pm

tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 13,924
And1: 9,361
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#75 » by tmorgan » Sat May 3, 2025 2:10 pm

Canadafan wrote:https://www.theringer.com/2025/05/02/nba/detroit-pistons-nba-trade-rumors-playoffs-2025


Spot on, I think. Don’t get crazy.
catari11
Freshman
Posts: 83
And1: 30
Joined: Jun 24, 2022

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#76 » by catari11 » Sat May 3, 2025 2:32 pm

spot on to a point. the author makes at least one astute observation: "Sure, the Pistons could use a modern, offensively versatile big man to complement Duren and Stewart, as well as more outside shooting." This is the key takeaway point. Langdon doesn't have to be impulsive or act irrationally but if he can succeed to addressing either or both of these missing elements this summer. Pistons will take a big leap forward.
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,972
And1: 1,941
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#77 » by Canadafan » Sat May 3, 2025 2:48 pm

catari11 wrote:spot on to a point. the author makes at least one astute observation: "Sure, the Pistons could use a modern, offensively versatile big man to complement Duren and Stewart, as well as more outside shooting." This is the key takeaway point. Langdon doesn't have to be impulsive or act irrationally but if he can succeed to addressing either or both of these missing elements this summer. Pistons will take a big leap forward.


Who though, is the big question :-?
Markkanen? Sabonis? Bam?
With Duren and Stew manning center, who best fits in at PF?
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,614
And1: 22,753
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#78 » by MotownMadness » Sat May 3, 2025 2:54 pm

Canadafan wrote:
catari11 wrote:spot on to a point. the author makes at least one astute observation: "Sure, the Pistons could use a modern, offensively versatile big man to complement Duren and Stewart, as well as more outside shooting." This is the key takeaway point. Langdon doesn't have to be impulsive or act irrationally but if he can succeed to addressing either or both of these missing elements this summer. Pistons will take a big leap forward.


Who though, is the big question :-?
Markkanen? Sabonis? Bam?
With Duren and Stew manning center, who best fits in at PF?

I would like to know what kind of price it takes for Lauri.

Dude looks bad right now on that contract but he was putting up legit All Star numbers the prior year.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,554
And1: 9,460
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#79 » by bstein14 » Sat May 3, 2025 3:08 pm

Teams that are likely going to try to shed salary IMO.

#1 Phoenix, highest payroll and in the lottery. KD trade could end up taking care of a lot of this. I wonder what KD's market is going to be.

#2 Minnesota... especially if they don't make it to the conference Finals.... could be a smaller dump off of vet PG Mike Conley or a bigger move away from someone like Julius Randle.

#3 Bucks have a massive payroll as well for a quick first round exit team and they have a Giannis decision to make that really effects everything.

#4. Cleveland is going to be way into the tax and they have their 6th man to give a bigger deal to this summer. Okoro for Font might make a lot of sense for both teams. I could see Cleveland paying a bunch of tax if they can make it to the Finals though.

#5. Denver is $12 million into the tax before adding anyone. They almost can't be too cheap though because they've already let other guys walk (KCP, Bruce Brown, etc) from the championship roster to save money and its really cost them. It's hard for them to cut salary though unless they end up moving off of MPjr who makes $35+ million.

#6 Orlando is already into luxury tax with the Suggs and Franz extensions starting next year and then you know Banchero is going to be going hard to his extension turns into a 30% for being all-nba next year... Not a ton of moving parts would most likely be a KCP trade into a smaller contract to get out of the luxury tax IMO or perhaps a trade of
Canadafan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,972
And1: 1,941
Joined: Nov 03, 2014
       

Re: Run it Back or Upgrade? 

Post#80 » by Canadafan » Sat May 3, 2025 3:17 pm

^^^^I feel like Phoenix will have a hard time getting much for KD. Everyone expects that to be the trade but can't see it being much of a needle mover. Beal won't go anywhere with his trade clause so they should deal Booker for a boat load of assets. Start it over and for short term just build something around remaining 2 yrs of KD and Beal
Minny night get cheap and have a hard time keeping Naz. I'm sure they'll figure it out though
Bucks would be insane to trade Giannis. Might have no choice though.
Okoro doesn't excite me too much anymore but if we could get.him for basically nothing I'd do it. He's an upgrade to Hardaway
PorterJr, if we could count on his health, would be a nice upgrade to Tobias.

Return to Detroit Pistons