ImageImageImage

The Trade Thread - v2

Moderators: Snakebites, dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip

User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#641 » by The Penguin » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:04 pm

Gallinari & Arthur

for

Monroe, Singler & Bynum


Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddle
KCP/Meeks
Gallinari/Butler/Datome/Martin
Smith/Arthur/Jerebko/Mitchell
Drummond/Gray

We balance the roster and cap off the summer of adding shooting around Drummond.

Nuggets go with

Lawson/Robinson/Bynum
Afflalo/Harris/Foye
Chandler/Singler/Miller
Faried/Hickson
Monroe/McGee/Mozgov/Nurkic


Monroe gives Denver a legitimate offensive post player that can run plays with Lawson & Afflalo.
User avatar
Timmaytime
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,890
And1: 1,717
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
Location: Beer City, USA
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#642 » by Timmaytime » Sat Jul 26, 2014 2:40 am

The Penguin wrote:Gallinari & Arthur

for

Monroe, Singler & Bynum


Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddle
KCP/Meeks
Gallinari/Butler/Datome/Martin
Smith/Arthur/Jerebko/Mitchell
Drummond/Gray

We balance the roster and cap off the summer of adding shooting around Drummond.

Nuggets go with

Lawson/Robinson/Bynum
Afflalo/Harris/Foye
Chandler/Singler/Miller
Faried/Hickson
Monroe/McGee/Mozgov/Nurkic


Monroe gives Denver a legitimate offensive post player that can run plays with Lawson & Afflalo.


Like this idea in general. I prefer Wilson Chandler though
ComboGuardCity wrote:If Bellinelli drops 50 and we lose I’ll eat my dog
Kstegall21
Freshman
Posts: 60
And1: 6
Joined: Apr 23, 2014
     

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#643 » by Kstegall21 » Sat Jul 26, 2014 3:23 am

I honestly don't think there is a better "system fit" in the whole NBA to play SF under SVG than Gallinari. Only if he is healthy of course.
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#644 » by coolness » Sat Jul 26, 2014 6:16 am

The Penguin wrote:Gallinari & Arthur

for

Monroe, Singler & Bynum


Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddle
KCP/Meeks
Gallinari/Butler/Datome/Martin
Smith/Arthur/Jerebko/Mitchell
Drummond/Gray

We balance the roster and cap off the summer of adding shooting around Drummond.



That doesn't balance the roster for jack-*&^%! You need 4 guys who can run an offense and 4 who can guard and be guarded by a center. Not perfectly, but adequately. And Gallo is an injury concern!

Just check out my sig for a true balance. :D And we would have +$30m in cap next summer along with a better lotto pick (because we're going to be lotto anyways.) Keeping Smennings around just makes everybody worse and want to leave Detroit. Drummond won't take kindly to more Smennings. Nobody needs a public quote about it to know that...
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#645 » by The Penguin » Sat Jul 26, 2014 11:18 am

coolness wrote:
The Penguin wrote:Gallinari & Arthur

for

Monroe, Singler & Bynum


Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddle
KCP/Meeks
Gallinari/Butler/Datome/Martin
Smith/Arthur/Jerebko/Mitchell
Drummond/Gray

We balance the roster and cap off the summer of adding shooting around Drummond.



That doesn't balance the roster for jack-*&^%! You need 4 guys who can run an offense and 4 who can guard and be guarded by a center. Not perfectly, but adequately. And Gallo is an injury concern!

Just check out my sig for a true balance. :D And we would have +$30m in cap next summer along with a better lotto pick (because we're going to be lotto anyways.) Keeping Smennings around just makes everybody worse and want to leave Detroit. Drummond won't take kindly to more Smennings. Nobody needs a public quote about it to know that...



1) Houston would never touch that
2) Atlanta wouldn't touch that
3) the Lakers wouldn't touch that
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#646 » by KJandHondo35 » Sat Jul 26, 2014 5:08 pm

What's your guys thoughts on this S&T idea for Monroe?

BOS: Jared Sullinger -Gerald Wallace -1st round pick

DET: Monroe

Gives you guys Sully, who's very comparable to Greg statistically and is 22 under a very cost friendly contract and I would think would pair well with Andre and could come off the bench. And GWall sucks but he still plays average defense at the SF position but you get a 1st to make up for that crap contract.

Celtics get Monroe and can experiment with him at 5 because we have nobody but an older less productive guy in Zeller at that position.

Tried to be fair to both sides, looking for your guy's input.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Image
coolness
Analyst
Posts: 3,443
And1: 303
Joined: May 20, 2007

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#647 » by coolness » Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:00 pm

The Penguin wrote:

1) Houston would never touch that
2) Atlanta wouldn't touch that
3) the Lakers wouldn't touch that


Lol, you're probably right.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,587
And1: 10,078
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#648 » by tmorgan » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:14 pm

KJandHondo35 wrote:What's your guys thoughts on this S&T idea for Monroe?

BOS: Jared Sullinger -Gerald Wallace -1st round pick

DET: Monroe

Gives you guys Sully, who's very comparable to Greg statistically and is 22 under a very cost friendly contract and I would think would pair well with Andre and could come off the bench. And GWall sucks but he still plays average defense at the SF position but you get a 1st to make up for that crap contract.

Celtics get Monroe and can experiment with him at 5 because we have nobody but an older less productive guy in Zeller at that position.

Tried to be fair to both sides, looking for your guy's input.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


To me, that'd be entirely dependent on the quality of the pick, but it's possible.
coordinator0
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 11, 2008

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#649 » by coordinator0 » Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:32 pm

Taking on Wallace's contract without Jennings or Smith (even with Monroe signing elsewhere) going out is a non-starter. Sullinger isn't much of a sweetener so that first round pick would have to be one with very limited, if any, protection from what looks to be a team that won't end up making the playoffs. As is I wouldn't touch that deal.
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#650 » by sc8581 » Sun Jul 27, 2014 2:47 am

KJandHondo35 wrote:What's your guys thoughts on this S&T idea for Monroe?

BOS: Jared Sullinger -Gerald Wallace -1st round pick

DET: Monroe

Gives you guys Sully, who's very comparable to Greg statistically and is 22 under a very cost friendly contract and I would think would pair well with Andre and could come off the bench. And GWall sucks but he still plays average defense at the SF position but you get a 1st to make up for that crap contract.

Celtics get Monroe and can experiment with him at 5 because we have nobody but an older less productive guy in Zeller at that position.

Tried to be fair to both sides, looking for your guy's input.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


I would rather let Monroe walk
User avatar
Exit 9
Junior
Posts: 405
And1: 193
Joined: Feb 19, 2008
       

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#651 » by Exit 9 » Sun Jul 27, 2014 2:13 pm

I know we how much we all love big, complicated 4 team trades but this came to me last night in the middle of a great buzz and I think it actually makes sense.


Det trades : Brandon Jennings to Denver, Will Bynum/2nd Rounders to Phoenix, Josh Smith to Kings
Det receives : Wilson Chandler from Den, Eric Bledsoe sign & trade from Suns

Denver Trades : Wilson Chandler to Pistons, Javelle McGee to Suns
Denver receives : Brandon Jennings from Pistons, Derrick Williams/Jason Thompson? from Kings

Suns trades : Eric Bledsoe to Detroit, Archie Goodwin to Kings
Suns receive : Javelle McGee from Denver, Will Bynum/other bench player from Detroit + 2nd rounder, Ben Mclemore from Kings,

Kings trade : Ben Mclemore to Suns, Derrick Williams/Jason Thompson to Denver
Kings receive : Josh Smith from Detroit, Archie Goodwin from Suns

Either we resign Moose, or still explore sign & trade options. Say that little Boston/Philly rumor the other day happens to be true, we'd start the season looking something like this.

Bledsoe/Augustin/Dinwiddle
KCP/Meeks/Young
Chandler/Singler/Butler
Young/Jerebko/whoever
Drummond/Olynyk/Grey

That's about as balanced as a roster as we could hope for, STILL leaves us with ample cap space seeing how the only person making big $$ would be Bledsoe, and people need to realize if we were to give him the max, it could only be 4 years/63 mill opposed to the 80 he's looking to get from the Suns.

Which of the mentioned teams say no? I think everybody gets fair value. And if anybody asks why does Denver deal for BJ, look at their roster. Their only current backup point guard is an injured Nate Robinson and it's slim pickings available in that department via free agency. Jennings is a backup, he'd go out there and be a super sub for Ty Lawson and allow them to keep playing the same pace they do when Ty is in the game.
313MADE
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#652 » by Blkbrd671 » Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:57 pm

KJandHondo35 wrote:What's your guys thoughts on this S&T idea for Monroe?

BOS: Jared Sullinger -Gerald Wallace -1st round pick

DET: Monroe

Gives you guys Sully, who's very comparable to Greg statistically and is 22 under a very cost friendly contract and I would think would pair well with Andre and could come off the bench. And GWall sucks but he still plays average defense at the SF position but you get a 1st to make up for that crap contract.

Celtics get Monroe and can experiment with him at 5 because we have nobody but an older less productive guy in Zeller at that position.

Tried to be fair to both sides, looking for your guy's input.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Well 1 you did a horrible job of being fair to both sides though granted that's how trades w other teams normally go.


Wallace + 1st doesn't do anything for us. we aren't looking for another big contract unless 1's going out. detroit would need incentive to let moose walk, sully is not that incentive. Jeff Green for Josh smith is really the only deal that makes sense that fits a need for detroit. I'd consider

Wallace+Young+Green

for

Smith+Singler
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#653 » by KJandHondo35 » Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:02 pm

Appreciate the feedback, it's funny because those on the Celtics Forum are killing me because they think its way too much for Monroe...

But even so I personally wouldn’t mind something like Sully and Green plus any combination of non-guaranteed contracts in Babb, Chris Johnson, and Phil Pressy to get up to whatever number Monroe is trying to sign for.

That gives you a Green-Smith-Drummond frontcourt with Sully off the bench which is a pretty daunting big rotation. IMO Monroe would actually play better from the 5, kind of like a skinny Big Al and as a 5 he would command 12-13M, even 14M wouldn’t be crazy looking at other center’s contracts. But DET has already one of if not the best Center prospect in the NBA in Drummond so it just wouldn’t make that much sense to sign him for that money. Monroe at the 5 will mitigate his lateral quickness issues when covering what is now the norm in smaller, quicker, “Stretch 4s” and would only present mismatches at 5 for say the handful of teams using a traditional big 5 like say the Pacers. But CHA showed the NBA you can constrct a top 5 defense with an average defender at the Center position which I see at the worst Monroe projects to be as a full time 5.
Image
User avatar
Ghost
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,452
And1: 509
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
Location: Hell
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#654 » by Ghost » Mon Jul 28, 2014 1:51 pm

KJandHondo35 wrote:Appreciate the feedback, it's funny because those on the Celtics Forum are killing me because they think its way too much for Monroe...

But even so I personally wouldn’t mind something like Sully and Green plus any combination of non-guaranteed contracts in Babb, Chris Johnson, and Phil Pressy to get up to whatever number Monroe is trying to sign for.

That gives you a Green-Smith-Drummond frontcourt with Sully off the bench which is a pretty daunting big rotation. IMO Monroe would actually play better from the 5, kind of like a skinny Big Al and as a 5 he would command 12-13M, even 14M wouldn’t be crazy looking at other center’s contracts. But DET has already one of if not the best Center prospect in the NBA in Drummond so it just wouldn’t make that much sense to sign him for that money. Monroe at the 5 will mitigate his lateral quickness issues when covering what is now the norm in smaller, quicker, “Stretch 4s” and would only present mismatches at 5 for say the handful of teams using a traditional big 5 like say the Pacers. But CHA showed the NBA you can constrct a top 5 defense with an average defender at the Center position which I see at the worst Monroe projects to be as a full time 5.

Yeah, it's just how the game works. If you look through this thread objectively or from the other side, I'm sure you could find some hilarious proposals. I don't really like Sully, so I wouldn't be interested. I dont really like Green that much either, but he's been talked about a ton on this board.

Your opinion about Monroe at the 5 is spot-on, he's basically too slow to deal with the small ball linesups of today and he just appears... Awkward in space being out away from the basket. Since he's not really a shot blocker the best situation would be to pair him with a guy like Ibaka. Or ironically, Josh Smith. Unfortunately (lmao), we have Andre Drummond so that's not really an option for us. We should have just played Drummond/Monroe+surrounded with shooters a bunch last year, but we didn't, so them two co-existing on the court together is a bit of an unknown.

Thanks for posting again :)
User avatar
Ghost
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,452
And1: 509
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
Location: Hell
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#655 » by Ghost » Mon Jul 28, 2014 2:00 pm

The Penguin wrote:Gallinari & Arthur

for

Monroe, Singler & Bynum


Honestly, I like the idea. I dont think the Nuggets board would be so keen on it since they still like Gallo.

The bad: Gallo tore his ACL and for some reason thought it would heal itself or some **** so he took forever to get the surgery. That's a little bit different then like how other people go about it, so I'd be a little worried. The good side is that his game was not based on athleticism, more so being a good shooter, crafty, and flopping the **** out of driving to the basket to draw fouls (seriously looking like whiplash).

The good: perimeter playmaker, shooter, go-to option... Detroit need it all :lol:
User avatar
Entourage27
Sophomore
Posts: 104
And1: 19
Joined: May 18, 2014
   

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#656 » by Entourage27 » Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:55 pm

Pistons trade: Will Bynum, Gigi Datome, and Tony Mitchell
Pistons receive: Jared Dudley

Clippers trade: Jared Dudley
Clippers receive: Will Bynum, Gigi Datome, 2nd rounder (heavily protected)

Heat trade: 2nd rounder (heavily protected)
Heat receive: Tony Mitchell

Why for Pistons?
We get rid of our garbage for a wing player who can fit right in with what we are trying to do. Dudley can hit the 3 from the corner consistently and is capable of playing a large role as a 3 and D player.

Why for Clippers?
With only Chris Paul and Jordan Farmar playing PG on the roster adding Will Bynum would be a great addition given Chris Pauls injury history. With Reggie Bullock taking minutes away from Dudley that leaves him expendable and Gigi is added for further depth at the wing position. Dudley is 2 years and Bynum and Datome are expirings which helps shed cap space for them. 2nd rounder is an added benefit.

Why for Heat?
They may never even lose the pic they trade and fill a roster spot out with a young expiring big man who still has potential.

Jennings / DJ / Dinwiddie
KCP / Meeks / Martin
Singler / Butler / Dudley
Monroe / Smith / Jerebko
Drummond / Gray
jakebernat
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,960
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 26, 2014
Location: downriver, MI

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#657 » by jakebernat » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:16 pm

Entourage27 wrote:Pistons trade: Will Bynum, Gigi Datome, and Tony Mitchell
Pistons receive: Jared Dudley

Clippers trade: Jared Dudley
Clippers receive: Will Bynum, Gigi Datome, 2nd rounder (heavily protected)

Heat trade: 2nd rounder (heavily protected)
Heat receive: Tony Mitchell

Why for Pistons?
We get rid of our garbage for a wing player who can fit right in with what we are trying to do. Dudley can hit the 3 from the corner consistently and is capable of playing a large role as a 3 and D player.

Why for Clippers?
With only Chris Paul and Jordan Farmar playing PG on the roster adding Will Bynum would be a great addition given Chris Pauls injury history. With Reggie Bullock taking minutes away from Dudley that leaves him expendable and Gigi is added for further depth at the wing position. Dudley is 2 years and Bynum and Datome are expirings which helps shed cap space for them. 2nd rounder is an added benefit.

Why for Heat?
They may never even lose the pic they trade and fill a roster spot out with a young expiring big man who still has potential.

Jennings / DJ / Dinwiddie
KCP / Meeks / Martin
Singler / Butler / Dudley
Monroe / Smith / Jerebko
Drummond / Gray


not bad...not bad at all. i think dudley would win the starting SF spot. pretty good trade all around, good job!
Phenomenonsense
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,571
And1: 594
Joined: Nov 19, 2012
 

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#658 » by Phenomenonsense » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:37 pm

KJandHondo35 wrote:What's your guys thoughts on this S&T idea for Monroe?

BOS: Jared Sullinger -Gerald Wallace -1st round pick

DET: Monroe

Gives you guys Sully, who's very comparable to Greg statistically and is 22 under a very cost friendly contract and I would think would pair well with Andre and could come off the bench. And GWall sucks but he still plays average defense at the SF position but you get a 1st to make up for that crap contract.

Celtics get Monroe and can experiment with him at 5 because we have nobody but an older less productive guy in Zeller at that position.

Tried to be fair to both sides, looking for your guy's input.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


I don't see why we would do it for one pick. We take on Wallace's terrible contract which in it self is worth a pick, but then there is also the disparity of ability between Monroe and Sullinger. I would consider Wallace, Pick, Olynyk, and another asset. I want nothing to do with Sullinger, and I don't really care if the "other asset" is another pick or a young player (I have no idea who is on your roster that is a young talent so if there isn't one then I'd go for another pick. Not that you guys don't have 19 picks over the next 5 years.)
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#659 » by sc8581 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:13 am

KJandHondo35 wrote:Appreciate the feedback, it's funny because those on the Celtics Forum are killing me because they think its way too much for Monroe...

But even so I personally wouldn’t mind something like Sully and Green plus any combination of non-guaranteed contracts in Babb, Chris Johnson, and Phil Pressy to get up to whatever number Monroe is trying to sign for.

That gives you a Green-Smith-Drummond frontcourt with Sully off the bench which is a pretty daunting big rotation. IMO Monroe would actually play better from the 5, kind of like a skinny Big Al and as a 5 he would command 12-13M, even 14M wouldn’t be crazy looking at other center’s contracts. But DET has already one of if not the best Center prospect in the NBA in Drummond so it just wouldn’t make that much sense to sign him for that money. Monroe at the 5 will mitigate his lateral quickness issues when covering what is now the norm in smaller, quicker, “Stretch 4s” and would only present mismatches at 5 for say the handful of teams using a traditional big 5 like say the Pacers. But CHA showed the NBA you can constrct a top 5 defense with an average defender at the Center position which I see at the worst Monroe projects to be as a full time 5.


Personally I would be satisfied with a Monroe for Green and Sully swap but I'm not sure if that would be general consensus around here. Your Monroe/Jefferson comparison is slightly flawed in my opinion. They are both skilled and do all of their damage in the paint and both very good rebounders but Big Al is a much better scorer and shot blocker, plus he really stepped up his defense this past year. Monroe just doesn't have the length to ever be what Al is or have that type of effect on the game.

Sully would be a very nice fit coming off the bench next to Drummond or Smith and Green though not perfect would still bring multiple things we don't currently have at the SF position.

Drummond/Sully
Smith/Sully/Jerebko
Green/Butler/Singler
Meeks/KCP
Jennings/Augustine
User avatar
KJandHondo35
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,829
And1: 1,259
Joined: Dec 18, 2013
     

Re: The Trade Thread - v2 

Post#660 » by KJandHondo35 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:20 pm

Okay guys, you've been fun to bounce ideas off of, but how about this home run?

Rondo- Any combo of Non-Guarantees (Bogans 5M, Babb, Chris Johnson, Pressy)
for
Monroe- KCP- 2015 1st

Rondo is our best player entering his prime (albeit with injury concerns) but still put up 12-5-10 in the 30 games back over 33.3 minutes per game. I think DET could stand to improve with a ball movement PG setting up Smoove and especially Drummond and pulling Jennings off the ball might allow him to be more reliable as a spot up shooter. I think Rondo’s clearly publicized friendship with Smoove also makes him resigning with you at seasons end highly likely, not to mention playing with a budding All-Star in Drummond.

Celtics basically set the table for Smart but get a young/reliable big in Monroe, plus a pure raw potential SG scorer with size (unlike Avery). Just a thought I had that I feel could benefit DET immediately and still give the Celtics some building blocks for the future.
Image

Return to Detroit Pistons