sc8581 wrote:paQo the BAWSER wrote:I'm tired of all your facts, stats are a pretty s**t, I got eyes man, that's all I know, the stats can be manipulate and use it like you want.
Love is better PF by stats than BG or LMA, that's facts... I don't know why everybody here are obsessed with the word facts.
So fg% and PPS are manipulated stats? Ok kid.
Manipulated maybe isn't the correct word, what I meant is when you see a "2nd player with +30 points, +20 rebounds and +5 blocks in the NBA history", is an incredible performance no doubt, but if you put 2 less points, or rebounds, or blocks, there are more players that they did it.
Stats means nothing, Knight this year put a good stats but in the worst NBA team, Monroe have put some good stats but he never has shown that he can be a reference on offense when the game is close and he isn't (in my opinion) a consistent player, some days is an all star without doubt and other days is just an average player.
Same as Hayward, or Turner, or any of these boys. Monroe is a good player and he can be nearly to great, I haven't got any problem with him here, but there are some guys trying to sell another reality, same as the Monroe's haters, saying he's extremely inefficient or he's incredible bad on defense (when he's a good post defender, no doubt).
Is not black and white, and you can tell me s**t about facts, stats or whatever, but at the end of the day, I got eyes man, and I know what I've seen, do you?