Page 1 of 1
Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:46 pm
by retrolenny
What does everyone think about the following trade?
Det Out: Stuckey, Daye, Singler
Det in: Jack, Landry
I think it makes us a much more complete team and is fair for both teams.
We become:
Knight/Bynum
Jack/Knight
Prince/Landry
Max/CV
Moose/AD/(Resign Wallace)
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:14 pm
by menten
they wont do it
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:36 pm
by DetroitDon15
I don't see how that helps us much in all honesty.
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:41 pm
by The Penguin
Why would we trade a young, cheap player in Singler to add two 30 year olds to a borderline fringe playoff team?
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:49 pm
by BadMofoPimp
Piston Prince wrote:Why would we trade a young, cheap player in Singler to add two 30 year olds to a borderline fringe playoff team?
Solid point. I also don't see why GS would do it either.
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:22 pm
by Umbra
I'd probably do it. I like Jack and Landry a lot, and they are pretty good players. Although Daye and Stuckey have very little value this year. GS laughs us off the phone.
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:40 pm
by roc
^elder scrolls fan?
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:49 pm
by Umbra
r0cd0gg wrote:^elder scrolls fan?
No, astronomy student.
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:10 pm
by vege
Thats bad for GSW. Jack and Landry are very important for their team.
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:17 pm
by retrolenny
vege wrote:Thats bad for GSW. Jack and Landry are very important for their team.
Since when have the Warriors ever done the right thing??
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:31 pm
by retrolenny
Stuck is NOT a scrub. He is simply not used correctly by Frank.
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:42 pm
by Jodi
We could get more for Stuckey...
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:01 pm
by vege
retrolenny wrote:vege wrote:Thats bad for GSW. Jack and Landry are very important for their team.
Since when have the Warriors ever done the right thing??
They drafted Udoh over Monroe. Wait that's bad.
They fired Nellie right? Erg I think he retired
You may be right. We're talking about GSW
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:18 pm
by retrolenny
vege wrote:retrolenny wrote:vege wrote:Thats bad for GSW. Jack and Landry are very important for their team.
Since when have the Warriors ever done the right thing??
They drafted Udoh over Monroe. Wait that's bad.
They fired Nellie right? Erg I think he retired
You may be right. We're talking about GSW
I've always liked Jack. His game reminds me of Billups. He's not as good but would make a great consolation prize!
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:28 pm
by Joe Berry
Jack will be a free agent, GS will be close to the luxtax next season, i doubt they can afford to keep him, get him! great backup PG.
Re: Det/GS
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:32 pm
by lakerhater
vege wrote:retrolenny wrote:vege wrote:Thats bad for GSW. Jack and Landry are very important for their team.
Since when have the Warriors ever done the right thing??
They drafted Udoh over Monroe. Wait that's bad.
They fired Nellie right? Erg I think he retired
You may be right. We're talking about GSW
I hope you all don't think I'm trolling in this thread, I only dropped by the Pistons page to read opinions on the Calderon for Prince deal but I happened to notice this thread as well.
Just thought I'd point out that GSW's new ownership group didn't draft Udoh (that draft happened prior to the NBA approving the team's sale) but they did fire Nellie as one of their first moves, he didn't retire.
Since the new ownership group has taken over they've made plenty of quality moves- Bogut for Monta, drafting Klay Thompson, signing Jack and Landry in free agency for example.
As to the OP's deal there's no way the W's would do it. Jack and Landry are far too important to the W's current success. Jack is GSW's Curry insurance policy at backup PG. Also, none of the players Detroit would trade provide anything the W's need.