DetroitPistons wrote:I want my best perimeter defender to be at his best and defend his natural position, which is PG. Its obvious to anyone that Knight is better guarding PGs. So instead of at least having one good match up defensively against their backcourt (Knight on DWill), we have none because Knight is very undersized against Johnson, who is a big SG and Calderon just sucks at defense all together. I really shouldn't even need to explain that because it is blatant common sense. I would rather have Knight on DWill and Stuckey on Johnson while Calderon comes off the bench. It's ridiculous how you try to twist things around to try and fit your horrible arguments and it's even worse when you throw on your laughing emoticons as if there's no debate. I doubt you will find a single person on this board who thinks Calderon/Knight is better defensively than Knight/Stuckey.
Your argument makes no sense because Knight/Stuckey would not be the starting backcourt if not for them trading for Calderon. The starting backcourt would be Knight/Singler still. And they wouldn't have even traded for Calderon just to bring him off the bench and start Knight/Stuckey like you want.
No offense, but you're starting to sound like a baby over this whole Knight at SG thing. If you're going to whine about this the rest of the season, you might as well go follow another team because the Pistons have already said they are evaluting Knight at SG the rest of the year, so get over it.
