Page 1 of 2
Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:01 pm
by Buttastix
Real GM is tweeting that we are one of many teams interested in Bledsoe. Would you give up Knight/Stucky for him?
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:09 pm
by Q00
Yes
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:10 pm
by Spider156
No. Not both. Preferably Stuckey. I see Bledsoe as another Darren Collison. What happened to him on the Pacers? Oh yeah he got traded. I think Bledsoe is good for the same reason Collison was. Paul. Bledso is overrated. Stuckey for Bledsoe and nothing more.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:11 pm
by princeofpalace
Not Knight, I find Bledsoe to be incredibly overrated. I would love for Joe D to get over his combo guard fetish
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:13 pm
by The_Irony
And why exactly would LAC want Stuckey for?
Not the biggest fan of Bledsoe. Plays big(vertical) but just seems much smaller than 6'1
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:13 pm
by ComboGuardCity
Backup qb syndrome.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:16 pm
by DetroitDon15
I'm assuming the Clippers would want number 8 or Monroe. I can't see Knight being of interest since he plays the same spot as Bledsoe and Paul. Adding Monroe for them would allow them to move Jordan much easier. I also think since the rumor of the Clips wanting Affallo, Harkness, and a future pick for Bledsoe makes me think the price is super high. I'd just stay clear at this point.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:21 pm
by coordinator0
ComboGuardCity wrote:Backup qb syndrome.
I think that's a good way of putting it. Sometimes they end up succeeding but more often than not they're way over-valued by the teams acquiring them to start.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:24 pm
by Jodi
Spider156 wrote:No. Not both. Preferably Stuckey. I see Bledsoe as another Darren Collison. What happened to him on the Pacers? Oh yeah he got traded. I think Bledsoe is good for the same reason Collison was. Paul. Bledso is overrated. Stuckey for Bledsoe and nothing more.
This +100...I dont want Bledsoe at all, not even for Stuckey...
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:48 pm
by rock digger
The fact that we're interested in Bledsoe says a lot about Dumars' confidence in Knight. Thank god.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:07 pm
by Hotmayo
It's exciting to see what a desperate joe will do
If They are trading knight than draft Kcp
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:11 pm
by haulerch
I think the Clips will be selling high, more than what Bledsoe will probably be worth.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:28 pm
by c-dot
Why don't we just take Kabongo or Goodwin or one of the many quick PGs available in the 2nd?
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:20 pm
by pollack419
i agree get a pg in the 2nd rd it is a deep pg draft. too much for him
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:29 pm
by Blkbrd671
hell no, back up PG
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:52 pm
by haulerch
I like his athleticism, play making, and defense. Guy is a block machine for his size!
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:35 am
by Minas
ComboGuardCity wrote:Backup qb syndrome.
This. He's very overrated, I would trade Stuckey for him but definitely not Knight or Knight/Stuckey.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:47 am
by ComboGuardCity
Minas wrote:ComboGuardCity wrote:Backup qb syndrome.
This. He's very overrated, I would trade Stuckey for him but definitely not Knight or Knight/Stuckey.
Yeah no knight but I'd part with Singler too. He'd make a great 3rd guard...not the star people think imo.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:19 am
by OneBadMutha
I have to admit that I'm really intrigued by this guy. He did well when forced to start last year. Backing up Paul may have helped this guy long term much like backing up Brandon helped Chauncy. Bledsoe is a guy with a lot of untapped potential while not exactly being over his head in the short term either. He's another two way player.
If Pistons do give up on Knight, Bledsoe might be the best risk/reward option to gamble on.
Re: Bledsoe
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:23 am
by Snakebites
Why do we think the Clippers are interested in Knight?
They see Bledsoe as a chip to get them someone who can start for them and therefor do more than Bledsoe could. Even if they actually liked Knight, why would they make this deal?