Defending Joe Dumars...
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:46 am
Note: Joe has made made many mistakes and we could be a lot better right now. It wouldn't be the end of the world for me to see Joe get fired, but I don't think he's the complete moron a lot of us (myself included) have painted him to be. This is a totally best (worst) case scenario (but plausible) look at what might have happened with JoeD
Coaches
1. Rick Carlisle
Rick is a great coach now and led the Pistons on a pretty decent playoff run. However, IIRC, ownership didn't like Rick and there were reports at the time that management wanted Rick out. Plus, we end up getting a championship ring with the next coach. So not a terrible canning.
2. Larry Brown.
He won us a ship! Great hiring! However, LB was pimping himself out to other teams while still under contract! Do you really want to keep around a coach who wants to upgrade? Plus, evident from his last years, he was done as a championship coach anyways.
3. Flip Saunders.
Pretty mediocre coach, but probably the best signing at the time. From what I remember, the only other guy to purse was Nate (go figure). He was then canned because he lost with a contender in the conference championship. It wasn't just the losing that was concerning it was the sputtering that really sucked and frustrated all of us. When you're a championship team and you lose like that, the coach is gone.
4. Michael Curry.
Here, Joe starts to gamble. Curry was a stand-up guy who commanded respect. He was pretty much pre-lockout Derrick Fisher at the time. Joe was looking for a long term answer as he decided to re-tool the team. However, Curry's gameplan lacked any sort of gameplan. He was a bad hire. At the time, we should've gone with Avery Johnson. But really, would AI, Sheed, Rip have listened to him either?
5. John Kuester
This was after the desperation signings (more on that later). It was between Avery, John, and Thibs. Avery was choice #1. Talks broke down because he wanted more money than he was worth. Both remaining candidates were unkowns. A decision had to be made. Do you go with a coach you know and have gone to a championship with or do you give an unknown assistant the chance to implement a defense that worked (albeit with 3 HOFers)? Add to the fact, you just signed to offense first guys, who are supposed to lead the team. Joe chose wrong here. Thibs was the right choice and its painfully obvious...in hindsight. But Kuester looked like a genius at the time working with Lebron. We later came to realize, Lebron was just really really good.
6. Lawrence Frank
He wasn't even Dumars's guy. Non-issue.
7. Mo Cheeks
Good ole Mo. We had a great run of 50 games. However, Mo apparently wasn't Dumars's #1 guy. He wanted Nate. Would Nate have been? Of course, Mo brought in the worst case scenario sans asking Josh to play full time point. Until we see some more reports, I'm not sure we can blame Joe 100% for this one.
Signings
1. Signing Rip to an extension.
Rip had just turned 30. But he was coming off his most efficient season ever. He was distributing better and somehow started hitting 3s at a crazy percentage. We all remember, how Rip's conditioning was shoved down our throats. He should be just leaving his prime by the end of his contract. He was undoubtedly the player with the best future ahead of him amongst our core.
2. Trading Billups for AI.
I was ecstatic at the time. We weren't winning a ship with the current team. It had ran its course. AI was still a relatively efficient player. I thought for sure, we had a chance to at least make some noise in the playoffs. Plus, we would be able to do a re-vamp the team with cap space the next summer. Stuckey looked like a star in the making and would easily fill in for Chauncey in due time. Right guys? Next season we would have Stuckey-Rip-Tay + tons of cap space to go after an all star like Boozer. Maybe make a trade for a star player. It was a genius move at the time...awful in hindsight.
3. Trading Afflalo
We cared for about 2 weeks. Then we got over it. Now we're kicking ourselves because he developed into a great player. But at the time, was he really going to get playing time behind our 2 all star shooting guards?
4. Signing BG and Charlie V.
This was a split signing at the time. But remember, we had just struck out on Boozer and Joe didn't have time for a stop gap with the whole ownership mess. Ben Gordon was at the very least, an elite sixth man who could create his own offense. He was clutch in the playoffs and almost single handedly beat the Celtics a couple times in the playoffs. Plus, he was going to be in his prime. In terms of Charlie V, we needed a 4 after losing out on Boozer. He was young and showed massive potential. He could score from anywhere. All he needed was some focus. Hell, some of the guys that hated him compared him to Bosh
. He's a great bench player at worst and its not like 8mill a year is going to kill your cap space for a decent role player.
Present Day
The jury is still out on Josh and Jennings. I don't mind the Jennings signing. He's not too expensive and its only 3 years. He's tradeable at the very least. For Josh, well, if we don't get a coach who can talk a decade of shooting jumpers out of him (don't hold your breath), we have a very valuable player. He was a great defender at the 3 when he played there in Atlanta so maybe it was the coach (again don't bet on it). But its still not a complete lost cause.
All in all, this was the most Pro Joe-D stance one could take. He is to blame for many things and there are reasons for him to be fired, but maybe he's not as bad as we all have made him out to be?
Coaches
1. Rick Carlisle
Rick is a great coach now and led the Pistons on a pretty decent playoff run. However, IIRC, ownership didn't like Rick and there were reports at the time that management wanted Rick out. Plus, we end up getting a championship ring with the next coach. So not a terrible canning.
2. Larry Brown.
He won us a ship! Great hiring! However, LB was pimping himself out to other teams while still under contract! Do you really want to keep around a coach who wants to upgrade? Plus, evident from his last years, he was done as a championship coach anyways.
3. Flip Saunders.
Pretty mediocre coach, but probably the best signing at the time. From what I remember, the only other guy to purse was Nate (go figure). He was then canned because he lost with a contender in the conference championship. It wasn't just the losing that was concerning it was the sputtering that really sucked and frustrated all of us. When you're a championship team and you lose like that, the coach is gone.
4. Michael Curry.
Here, Joe starts to gamble. Curry was a stand-up guy who commanded respect. He was pretty much pre-lockout Derrick Fisher at the time. Joe was looking for a long term answer as he decided to re-tool the team. However, Curry's gameplan lacked any sort of gameplan. He was a bad hire. At the time, we should've gone with Avery Johnson. But really, would AI, Sheed, Rip have listened to him either?
5. John Kuester
This was after the desperation signings (more on that later). It was between Avery, John, and Thibs. Avery was choice #1. Talks broke down because he wanted more money than he was worth. Both remaining candidates were unkowns. A decision had to be made. Do you go with a coach you know and have gone to a championship with or do you give an unknown assistant the chance to implement a defense that worked (albeit with 3 HOFers)? Add to the fact, you just signed to offense first guys, who are supposed to lead the team. Joe chose wrong here. Thibs was the right choice and its painfully obvious...in hindsight. But Kuester looked like a genius at the time working with Lebron. We later came to realize, Lebron was just really really good.
6. Lawrence Frank
He wasn't even Dumars's guy. Non-issue.
7. Mo Cheeks
Good ole Mo. We had a great run of 50 games. However, Mo apparently wasn't Dumars's #1 guy. He wanted Nate. Would Nate have been? Of course, Mo brought in the worst case scenario sans asking Josh to play full time point. Until we see some more reports, I'm not sure we can blame Joe 100% for this one.
Signings
1. Signing Rip to an extension.
Rip had just turned 30. But he was coming off his most efficient season ever. He was distributing better and somehow started hitting 3s at a crazy percentage. We all remember, how Rip's conditioning was shoved down our throats. He should be just leaving his prime by the end of his contract. He was undoubtedly the player with the best future ahead of him amongst our core.
2. Trading Billups for AI.
I was ecstatic at the time. We weren't winning a ship with the current team. It had ran its course. AI was still a relatively efficient player. I thought for sure, we had a chance to at least make some noise in the playoffs. Plus, we would be able to do a re-vamp the team with cap space the next summer. Stuckey looked like a star in the making and would easily fill in for Chauncey in due time. Right guys? Next season we would have Stuckey-Rip-Tay + tons of cap space to go after an all star like Boozer. Maybe make a trade for a star player. It was a genius move at the time...awful in hindsight.
3. Trading Afflalo
We cared for about 2 weeks. Then we got over it. Now we're kicking ourselves because he developed into a great player. But at the time, was he really going to get playing time behind our 2 all star shooting guards?
4. Signing BG and Charlie V.
This was a split signing at the time. But remember, we had just struck out on Boozer and Joe didn't have time for a stop gap with the whole ownership mess. Ben Gordon was at the very least, an elite sixth man who could create his own offense. He was clutch in the playoffs and almost single handedly beat the Celtics a couple times in the playoffs. Plus, he was going to be in his prime. In terms of Charlie V, we needed a 4 after losing out on Boozer. He was young and showed massive potential. He could score from anywhere. All he needed was some focus. Hell, some of the guys that hated him compared him to Bosh

Present Day
The jury is still out on Josh and Jennings. I don't mind the Jennings signing. He's not too expensive and its only 3 years. He's tradeable at the very least. For Josh, well, if we don't get a coach who can talk a decade of shooting jumpers out of him (don't hold your breath), we have a very valuable player. He was a great defender at the 3 when he played there in Atlanta so maybe it was the coach (again don't bet on it). But its still not a complete lost cause.
All in all, this was the most Pro Joe-D stance one could take. He is to blame for many things and there are reasons for him to be fired, but maybe he's not as bad as we all have made him out to be?