Page 1 of 2
OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 6:23 pm
by ComboGuardCity
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 6:34 pm
by Warspite
"Nobody likes Goliath."
Wilt Chamberlain
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 7:08 pm
by Billl
2nd year players are usually discounted for MIP. It's just generally expected that they will improve.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:25 pm
by tmorgan
Except Anthony Davis came in third in the voting overall.
People are stupid -- Dragic definitely deserved to win, but Andre improved quite a bit (if nothing else, lots more minutes without stamina issues) and deserved more votes.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:35 pm
by Q00
Don't look now...
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:37 pm
by ImHeisenberg
He was a truly awful team and was generally viewed as a minus defender. I can see why he was passed over.
Dragic was the leader on an over-achieving team, and should have made the all-star team.
I get it. No worries. Maybe it will motivate Drummond this summer?
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:53 pm
by ComboGuardCity
ImHeisenberg wrote:He was a truly awful team and was generally viewed as a minus defender. I can see why he was passed over.
Dragic was the leader on an over-achieving team, and should have made the all-star team.
I get it. No worries. Maybe it will motivate Drummond this summer?
I agree he doesn't deserve it. I just found it funny that blaha thought he did.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:10 pm
by Sheeeeed
You can always count on Blaha for the homer vote.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:32 am
by DetroitSho
tmorgan wrote:Except Anthony Davis came in third in the voting overall.
People are stupid -- Dragic definitely deserved to win, but Andre improved quite a bit (if nothing else, lots more minutes without stamina issues) and deserved more votes.
So you think he should have lost a little closer? I'm not sure what the difference is if you felt the right person won.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:57 am
by Ghost
I thought Drummond would get some votes, but you have to love how Dragic came on.. Everybody thought the Suns would be a bottom-5 team and were basically tanking and Dragic stepped up and had an all-star type performance for the season

Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:58 am
by RSCD3_
Did he vote KCP rookie of the year?
Lol blaha
Sent from my SCH-I800 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:16 pm
by Billl
"Except Anthony Davis came in third in the voting overall."
Yeah, that proves the point. By the numbers - Increases from the prior year
Dragic
+5.6 ppg
-1.5 apg
+0.1 rpg
0.0 bpg
-0.2 spg
Davis
+7.3 ppg
+0.6 apg
+1.8 rpg
+1.0 bpg
+0.1 spg
Dragic had a heck of a year, but Davis improved more in every major statistical category. Across the board, he improved more than dragic, but he still trailed a distant third in "Most improved" voting. Granted, Dragic certainly has a well deserved leg up due to his team success, but it's pretty obvious that 2nd year improvement is heavily discounted in the voting process.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:26 pm
by wallace72
He should even vote for Dumars as GM off the year

Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:58 pm
by tmorgan
Billl wrote:"Except Anthony Davis came in third in the voting overall."
Yeah, that proves the point. By the numbers - Increases from the prior year
Dragic
+5.6 ppg
-1.5 apg
+0.1 rpg
0.0 bpg
-0.2 spg
Davis
+7.3 ppg
+0.6 apg
+1.8 rpg
+1.0 bpg
+0.1 spg
Dragic had a heck of a year, but Davis improved more in every major statistical category. Across the board, he improved more than dragic, but he still trailed a distant third in "Most improved" voting. Granted, Dragic certainly has a well deserved leg up due to his team success, but it's pretty obvious that 2nd year improvement is heavily discounted in the voting process.
All I said was that Drummond didn't get enough respect for his improvement...
+5.6 ppg
+5.6 rpg (!)
Everything else about even, although he did manage to shoot an even higher percentage and improved his FT% a little bit.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 7:20 pm
by Moose10Fan
If his D would have been better he would have been in the mix, except it got worse.
I love Drummond and he's going to be a monster, but he needs to drastically improve defensively. he was really bad this season on that end of the court.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:26 pm
by RSCD3_
Moose10Fan wrote:If his D would have been better he would have been in the mix, except it got worse.
I love Drummond and he's going to be a monster, but he needs to drastically improve defensively. he was really bad this season on that end of the court.
Jennings giving up 452 drives ( most in the nba ) will do that
Sent from my SCH-I800 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:45 pm
by Moose10Fan
RSCD3_ wrote:Moose10Fan wrote:If his D would have been better he would have been in the mix, except it got worse.
I love Drummond and he's going to be a monster, but he needs to drastically improve defensively. he was really bad this season on that end of the court.
Jennings giving up 452 drives ( most in the nba ) will do that
Sent from my SCH-I800 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Eh Jennings is a big problem, but Dre gets caught sleeping in the paint.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:34 am
by Minas
ImHeisenberg wrote:He was a truly awful team and was generally viewed as a minus defender. I can see why he was passed over.
Dragic was the leader on an over-achieving team, and should have made the all-star team.
I get it. No worries. Maybe it will motivate Drummond this summer?
This. Plus lottery picks in their second year should be expected to make a big leap. MIP is so ambiguous.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:35 am
by Minas
ImHeisenberg wrote:He was a truly awful team and was generally viewed as a minus defender. I can see why he was passed over.
Dragic was the leader on an over-achieving team, and should have made the all-star team.
I get it. No worries. Maybe it will motivate Drummond this summer?
This. Plus lottery picks in their second year should be expected to make a big leap. MIP is so ambiguous.
Re: OT: MIP - Drummond 1 vote
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:35 am
by tmorgan
Drummond's defense definitely wasn't as good as I expected, but I don't think it's fair to characterize it as "bad". Moose is bad. Jennings is very bad. Andre just isn't particularly "good" yet.