ImageImageImage

Boozer for Smith?

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,866
And1: 3,459
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Boozer for Smith? 

Post#1 » by theBigLip » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:10 pm

So if the Bulls are trying to get something for Boozer, wouldn't a Smith-Boozer trade make some sense? We would have to overpay Boozer for a year, but then we would be free. Also, seems like Boozer would be fine being a role player, whereas Smith feels he needs to be the star. Seems like a reasonable trade.
Neptune
Veteran
Posts: 2,699
And1: 1,386
Joined: Jan 30, 2014

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#2 » by Neptune » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:20 pm

Pistons won't do it
Redeemed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,519
And1: 419
Joined: Apr 06, 2012
     

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#3 » by Redeemed » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:27 pm

Deal!
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#4 » by MotownMadness » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:34 pm

That would be nice but the Bulls wouldn't do it.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#5 » by The Penguin » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:44 pm

The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.



I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.
jakebernat
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,960
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 26, 2014
Location: downriver, MI

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#6 » by jakebernat » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:07 pm

why would the bulls want smith when they have Gibson???

I feel like a broken record when I say that boozer will be amnestied...

Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app
jakebernat
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,960
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 26, 2014
Location: downriver, MI

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#7 » by jakebernat » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:09 pm

Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.



I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.


i'll do you one better, how about smennings for nash? The Lakers would still have money to go after a FA like ariza or deng, they could retain pau because of his bird rights, and they'd have their draft pick too.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#8 » by The Penguin » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:12 pm

jakebernat wrote:
Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.



I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.


i'll do you one better, how about smennings for nash? The Lakers would still have money to go after a FA like ariza or deng, they could retain pau because of his bird rights, and they'd have their draft pick too.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app



At this point I'd trade Jennings or Smith for a case of faygo and 48 year old Fennis Dembo.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,785
And1: 11,887
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#9 » by HotelVitale » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:22 pm

Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.

I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.


Bulls management is much to smart for this deal; they're getting more production at half the cost for Taj Gibson now. And they have Mirotic (who will be a four in the NBA) coming over this summer or next.

Can't see Nash retiring if he's traded here--$10m is $10m--but I could see the Lakers having interest in Smith. Especially if they're likely to lose next year's pick unless they reach a level of crappiness that's unlikely with Kobe around. Problem is that Smith's simply too expensive given how poorly he played last year. He's a bad contract rather than just a bloated one, so it's probably going to take either a team desperately in need of exactly what Smith offers or us taking back another bad contract.
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#10 » by sc8581 » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:30 pm

HotelVitale wrote:
Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.

I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.


Bulls management is much to smart for this deal; they're getting more production at half the cost for Taj Gibson now. And they have Mirotic (who will be a four in the NBA) coming over this summer or next.

Can't see Nash retiring if he's traded here--$10m is $10m--but I could see the Lakers having interest in Smith. Especially if they're likely to lose next year's pick unless they reach a level of crappiness that's unlikely with Kobe around. Problem is that Smith's simply too expensive given how poorly he played last year. He's a bad contract rather than just a bloated one, so it's probably going to take either a team desperately in need of exactly what Smith offers or us taking back another bad contract.


The only somewhat realistic idea I've seen was Smith and our pick for Gerald Wallace and Bostons pick.
E-Z
Pro Prospect
Posts: 763
And1: 213
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#11 » by E-Z » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:32 pm

I believe the Bulls are attempting to shed salary to acquire Melo. Acquiring Smith somewhat contradicts the notion.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#12 » by The Penguin » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:32 pm

HotelVitale wrote:
Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.

I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.


Bulls management is much to smart for this deal; they're getting more production at half the cost for Taj Gibson now. And they have Mirotic (who will be a four in the NBA) coming over this summer or next.

Can't see Nash retiring if he's traded here--$10m is $10m--but I could see the Lakers having interest in Smith. Especially if they're likely to lose next year's pick unless they reach a level of crappiness that's unlikely with Kobe around. Problem is that Smith's simply too expensive given how poorly he played last year. He's a bad contract rather than just a bloated one, so it's probably going to take either a team desperately in need of exactly what Smith offers or us taking back another bad contract.



Josh Smith may run away with the "most hated Piston" title. Just blows my mind how the guy would have so little professional pride that he'd flip the off switch before the ink dried on the contract. Now we are going to have to take back a contract of a guy who can't play to dump him and he'll end up becoming what he always should have been for a team like the Spurs.
jakebernat
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,960
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 26, 2014
Location: downriver, MI

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#13 » by jakebernat » Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:01 pm

sc8581 wrote:The only somewhat realistic idea I've seen was Smith and our pick for Gerald Wallace and Bostons pick.

god i hope that deal happens.
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#14 » by ImHeisenberg » Wed Apr 30, 2014 10:19 pm

I'd do it in a heart beat. Boozer is entering the last year of his deal, right? Even if there's two years, its better than Smith.
DCintheD
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,949
And1: 653
Joined: May 30, 2010
   

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#15 » by DCintheD » Wed Apr 30, 2014 10:36 pm

We'll end up trading Smith to a team with cap space that loses out on a big free agent. I can see Dallas taking a chance on him. The big names always seem to avoid dallas.
RIP PALACE OF AUBURN HILLS
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,998
And1: 15,123
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#16 » by Laimbeer » Thu May 1, 2014 12:28 am

I see no reason for Melo to go to Chicago. He makes them a second round or ECF team. He wants to win a title. But I suspect the Bulls are in denial.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#17 » by Blkbrd671 » Thu May 1, 2014 12:45 am

E-Z wrote:I believe the Bulls are attempting to shed salary to acquire Melo. Acquiring Smith somewhat contradicts the notion.



Agreed, although if melo falls through, then this would be a nice consolation prize. I would definitely do it as long as we'd be drafting a SF. I don't think Bullz do it however as it be hard to argue Smith>boozer
jakebernat
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,960
And1: 767
Joined: Jan 26, 2014
Location: downriver, MI

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#18 » by jakebernat » Thu May 1, 2014 2:48 am

Laimbeer wrote:I see no reason for Melo to go to Chicago. He makes them a second round or ECF team. He wants to win a title. But I suspect the Bulls are in denial.


Huh?? you don't think melo + rose makes this bulls team a contender?
wallace72
Junior
Posts: 341
And1: 83
Joined: Mar 10, 2014
     

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#19 » by wallace72 » Thu May 1, 2014 10:45 am

jakebernat wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:I see no reason for Melo to go to Chicago. He makes them a second round or ECF team. He wants to win a title. But I suspect the Bulls are in denial.


Huh?? you don't think melo + rose makes this bulls team a contender?


If Rose is/stays healthy and Noah plays like this year, yes.
Otherwise, no........
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: Boozer for Smith? 

Post#20 » by ImHeisenberg » Thu May 1, 2014 12:22 pm

jakebernat wrote:
Laimbeer wrote:I see no reason for Melo to go to Chicago. He makes them a second round or ECF team. He wants to win a title. But I suspect the Bulls are in denial.


Huh?? you don't think melo + rose makes this bulls team a contender?


I have serious reservations that Rose will be a top 10 player again. It's been 2+ years since we've seen him playing MVP caliber basketball. Never a good sign. Who has essentially been out for 2 years and came back as good as they were?

Return to Detroit Pistons