Boozer for Smith?
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Boozer for Smith?
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,866
- And1: 3,459
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Boozer for Smith?
So if the Bulls are trying to get something for Boozer, wouldn't a Smith-Boozer trade make some sense? We would have to overpay Boozer for a year, but then we would be free. Also, seems like Boozer would be fine being a role player, whereas Smith feels he needs to be the star. Seems like a reasonable trade.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,699
- And1: 1,386
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: Boozer for Smith?
Pistons won't do it
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,519
- And1: 419
- Joined: Apr 06, 2012
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
Deal!
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
That would be nice but the Bulls wouldn't do it.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
- The Penguin
- "Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
- Posts: 7,267
- And1: 4,109
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Columbus
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.
I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.
I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,960
- And1: 767
- Joined: Jan 26, 2014
- Location: downriver, MI
Re: Boozer for Smith?
why would the bulls want smith when they have Gibson???
I feel like a broken record when I say that boozer will be amnestied...
Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app
I feel like a broken record when I say that boozer will be amnestied...
Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,960
- And1: 767
- Joined: Jan 26, 2014
- Location: downriver, MI
Re: Boozer for Smith?
Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.
I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.
i'll do you one better, how about smennings for nash? The Lakers would still have money to go after a FA like ariza or deng, they could retain pau because of his bird rights, and they'd have their draft pick too.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: Boozer for Smith?
- The Penguin
- "Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
- Posts: 7,267
- And1: 4,109
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Columbus
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
jakebernat wrote:Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.
I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.
i'll do you one better, how about smennings for nash? The Lakers would still have money to go after a FA like ariza or deng, they could retain pau because of his bird rights, and they'd have their draft pick too.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using RealGM Forums mobile app
At this point I'd trade Jennings or Smith for a case of faygo and 48 year old Fennis Dembo.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,785
- And1: 11,887
- Joined: Sep 14, 2007
- Location: West Philly, PA
Re: Boozer for Smith?
Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.
I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.
Bulls management is much to smart for this deal; they're getting more production at half the cost for Taj Gibson now. And they have Mirotic (who will be a four in the NBA) coming over this summer or next.
Can't see Nash retiring if he's traded here--$10m is $10m--but I could see the Lakers having interest in Smith. Especially if they're likely to lose next year's pick unless they reach a level of crappiness that's unlikely with Kobe around. Problem is that Smith's simply too expensive given how poorly he played last year. He's a bad contract rather than just a bloated one, so it's probably going to take either a team desperately in need of exactly what Smith offers or us taking back another bad contract.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,876
- And1: 766
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Re: Boozer for Smith?
HotelVitale wrote:Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.
I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.
Bulls management is much to smart for this deal; they're getting more production at half the cost for Taj Gibson now. And they have Mirotic (who will be a four in the NBA) coming over this summer or next.
Can't see Nash retiring if he's traded here--$10m is $10m--but I could see the Lakers having interest in Smith. Especially if they're likely to lose next year's pick unless they reach a level of crappiness that's unlikely with Kobe around. Problem is that Smith's simply too expensive given how poorly he played last year. He's a bad contract rather than just a bloated one, so it's probably going to take either a team desperately in need of exactly what Smith offers or us taking back another bad contract.
The only somewhat realistic idea I've seen was Smith and our pick for Gerald Wallace and Bostons pick.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 763
- And1: 213
- Joined: May 04, 2013
Re: Boozer for Smith?
I believe the Bulls are attempting to shed salary to acquire Melo. Acquiring Smith somewhat contradicts the notion.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
- The Penguin
- "Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
- Posts: 7,267
- And1: 4,109
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Columbus
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
HotelVitale wrote:Piston Prince wrote:The Bulls are just going to amnesty Boozer in hopes of signing Melo. The reports I've heard have the team planning on going all out for Melo for months. I can't see them picking Smith over a chance at Melo. If they whiff on Melo they could bring back Deng or sign Stephenson.
I do think Smith for Nash is interesting. Nash isn't likely to turn down ~$10 mil to retire if the Lakers keep him, but there's a good chance he might if he's traded. Smith would cost the Lakers an extra $4 mil over Nash but he'd likely give them a lot more than Nash would. They'd still have plenty of cap room to do whatever they want, plus a top 6 pick this year. They owe their 2015 draft pick to PHX (top 5 protected) and I really don't know that Kobe would be willing to mail in another season based upon the Love/Kyrie 2015 hope.
Bulls management is much to smart for this deal; they're getting more production at half the cost for Taj Gibson now. And they have Mirotic (who will be a four in the NBA) coming over this summer or next.
Can't see Nash retiring if he's traded here--$10m is $10m--but I could see the Lakers having interest in Smith. Especially if they're likely to lose next year's pick unless they reach a level of crappiness that's unlikely with Kobe around. Problem is that Smith's simply too expensive given how poorly he played last year. He's a bad contract rather than just a bloated one, so it's probably going to take either a team desperately in need of exactly what Smith offers or us taking back another bad contract.
Josh Smith may run away with the "most hated Piston" title. Just blows my mind how the guy would have so little professional pride that he'd flip the off switch before the ink dried on the contract. Now we are going to have to take back a contract of a guy who can't play to dump him and he'll end up becoming what he always should have been for a team like the Spurs.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,960
- And1: 767
- Joined: Jan 26, 2014
- Location: downriver, MI
Re: Boozer for Smith?
sc8581 wrote:The only somewhat realistic idea I've seen was Smith and our pick for Gerald Wallace and Bostons pick.
god i hope that deal happens.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
I'd do it in a heart beat. Boozer is entering the last year of his deal, right? Even if there's two years, its better than Smith.
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,949
- And1: 653
- Joined: May 30, 2010
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
We'll end up trading Smith to a team with cap space that loses out on a big free agent. I can see Dallas taking a chance on him. The big names always seem to avoid dallas.
RIP PALACE OF AUBURN HILLS
Re: Boozer for Smith?
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,998
- And1: 15,123
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
I see no reason for Melo to go to Chicago. He makes them a second round or ECF team. He wants to win a title. But I suspect the Bulls are in denial.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: Boozer for Smith?
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
E-Z wrote:I believe the Bulls are attempting to shed salary to acquire Melo. Acquiring Smith somewhat contradicts the notion.
Agreed, although if melo falls through, then this would be a nice consolation prize. I would definitely do it as long as we'd be drafting a SF. I don't think Bullz do it however as it be hard to argue Smith>boozer
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,960
- And1: 767
- Joined: Jan 26, 2014
- Location: downriver, MI
Re: Boozer for Smith?
Laimbeer wrote:I see no reason for Melo to go to Chicago. He makes them a second round or ECF team. He wants to win a title. But I suspect the Bulls are in denial.
Huh?? you don't think melo + rose makes this bulls team a contender?
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 341
- And1: 83
- Joined: Mar 10, 2014
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
jakebernat wrote:Laimbeer wrote:I see no reason for Melo to go to Chicago. He makes them a second round or ECF team. He wants to win a title. But I suspect the Bulls are in denial.
Huh?? you don't think melo + rose makes this bulls team a contender?
If Rose is/stays healthy and Noah plays like this year, yes.
Otherwise, no........
Re: Boozer for Smith?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,465
- And1: 2,323
- Joined: Apr 01, 2013
-
Re: Boozer for Smith?
jakebernat wrote:Laimbeer wrote:I see no reason for Melo to go to Chicago. He makes them a second round or ECF team. He wants to win a title. But I suspect the Bulls are in denial.
Huh?? you don't think melo + rose makes this bulls team a contender?
I have serious reservations that Rose will be a top 10 player again. It's been 2+ years since we've seen him playing MVP caliber basketball. Never a good sign. Who has essentially been out for 2 years and came back as good as they were?