RealGM

What about having Harrison Barnes at the 3 Spot for Detroit?


-@bobeenfly_est92

Sure but how do we get him? Monroe will be too expensive for them seeing as they have Lee and Bogut who are currently better for a borderline contender.

He isn't actually good, but in any case why do you sign your posts with your username? You know that's pointless, right?

Plus, we already have a thread or two for this topic.

This is my first time using Real GM.


-@bobeenfly_est92

Notanoob wrote:He isn't actually good, but in any case why do you sign your posts with your username? You know that's pointless, right?

Plus, we already have a thread or two for this topic.

Hes worth picking up in my opinion. He was a stud in college and has shown potential at times inbthe pros. Hes also only 21 years old still.

MotownMadness wrote:

Notanoob wrote:He isn't actually good, but in any case why do you sign your posts with your username? You know that's pointless, right?

Plus, we already have a thread or two for this topic.

Hes worth picking up in my opinion. He was a stud in college and has shown potential at times inbthe pros. Hes also only 21 years old still.

He is pretty lack luster, I wouldn't do anything involving Monroe for him, and I doubt GS wants Monroe with having Lee.

^That's why you search for threads before starting new ones on the same topic.

At this point, I would probably rather have Draymond Green over Harrison Barnes. Not that impressed by Barnes at all.

haulerch wrote:^That's why you search for threads before starting new ones on the same topic.

At this point, I would probably rather have Draymond Green over Harrison Barnes. Not that impressed by Barnes at all.

Yeah I would take Green over him.

i would be all on board for Harrison Barnes he would really fit this team at the 3 but dont wanna give up alot to get him

Marvin Williams is a UFA.

Sign and trade Stuckey for Barnes & Speights. I'd add a couple of future 2nd round picks to get it done. I think Stuckey would be a great fit for Golden State.

Why not give Datome & Charlie for Barnes?

C'mon now -- no one is giving up anything for Stuckey or CV in an S&T. CV is a vet min player at best, and Stuckey certainly isn't good enough to get an extra year. These guys are gone and will return nothing but cap space. Be realistic.

bobeenfly_est92 wrote:Why not give Datome & Charlie for Barnes?

Well, Charlie is a free agent so you can't trade him. Datome shot like 19% from 3. Why would GSW do that trade EVEN IF it was possible? Barnes is not very good IMO, but it would be worth keeping him over a crap package.

Yes, I'd like to give Barnes a try at our SF spot. He's young, and if he improves, could be a great addition to our core. But what do we have to give up to get him?

I wouldn't mind Barnes but I just don't see any way we would trade for him. I wouldn't give up Moose for him and the warriors aren't going to trade him for smith. There is no one else on our roster who could get him imo, I definitely wouldn't trade KCP for him as I think KCP is better. I think we are better off going after someone else.

Barnes isn't worth more than a late first round pick or a couple of second rounders.

People are still high on him based purely on his hype coming out of college. He literally had one good playoff game over a year ago. That's his resume. That's it!

He's very athletic, but isn't a good decision maker or skilled player.

I would trade for him if the cost was fair, but I wouldn't even sacrifice a good role player for him.

I would love to get Barnes. I think he would greatly improve if given the minutes and Im sure SVG would be able to put him in situations to succeed. Locking down 4 starting spots with high potential young players like KCP, Barnes, Monroe, and Drummond would be a dream come true. Barnes can also should the 3 and defend. Although, I think it would take a 3 team deal to get him here. Maybe something with Smith or Jennings going to the 3 third team and Barnes coming here.

i would love barnes, but it would depend on the cost. I still think he can be a very good player, however he isn't that player yet. We do need a player with his skill set at the #8 position

Blkbrd671 wrote: We do need a player with his skill set at the #8 position

Has nobody told you? We lost the lottery.