Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,973
- And1: 4,897
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
He's buried in Orlando and they have prospects they value more than him. He's a tenacious defender, has improved his jumpshot, and is still very young. He's definitely a better fit than Singler and I bet he can be had for pennies.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,699
- And1: 1,386
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
Well CGC, if he can shoot I'm down. I already know he's a good defensive player.
Any trade proposals?
Any trade proposals?
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,113
- And1: 3,441
- Joined: Apr 19, 2010
- Location: Michigan
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
I'm not sure I want to give up assets for a guy that is buried on the Magic bench. He could pan out but I don't know if it's worth it. I was thinking of Smith trades that would get us a SF and I came up with this trade with WAS that would need to wait until Dec 25th:
Josh Smith, 2015 1st rounder
for
Otto Porter, Kris Humphries, Dejuan Blair, Rasual Butler
Why for WAS? They get another piece to try and put them over the top. Smith becomes a 4th or 5th offensive option behind Wall, Beal, Pierce, and maybe even Gortat. Nene becomes a super sub that can back up the 4 and 5 and gives them an improved big man rotation. They also get a pick for taking on the risk and giving up Porter. Porter would also be stuck behind Pierce and Webster (when he returns) in the rotation so they won't be losing much.
Wall/Miller
Beal/Temple/Rice
Pierce/Webster
Smith/Nene/Gooden
Gortat/Nene/Seraphin
Why for DET? We can waive Mitchell, Datome, and Butler to make roster space. We sacrifice a pick to dump Smith and get our SF of the future, two birds with one stone. Porter is a multi-skilled SF who can shoot and defend and was a former number 3 overall pick who only missed last season due to injury. He would start for us instantly. Smith would be gone and Monroe could step in as our go-to offensive big man. Our spacing would improve, our BBIQ would improve, and we would have an awesome young core of Drummond, Monroe, Porter, and KCP. Humphries and Blair would be helpful bigs off the bench too.
Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddie
Caldwell-Pope/Meeks
Porter/Butler/Singler
Monroe/Jerebko/Humphries/Blair
Drummond/Monroe/Anthony
Thoughts?
Josh Smith, 2015 1st rounder
for
Otto Porter, Kris Humphries, Dejuan Blair, Rasual Butler
Why for WAS? They get another piece to try and put them over the top. Smith becomes a 4th or 5th offensive option behind Wall, Beal, Pierce, and maybe even Gortat. Nene becomes a super sub that can back up the 4 and 5 and gives them an improved big man rotation. They also get a pick for taking on the risk and giving up Porter. Porter would also be stuck behind Pierce and Webster (when he returns) in the rotation so they won't be losing much.
Wall/Miller
Beal/Temple/Rice
Pierce/Webster
Smith/Nene/Gooden
Gortat/Nene/Seraphin
Why for DET? We can waive Mitchell, Datome, and Butler to make roster space. We sacrifice a pick to dump Smith and get our SF of the future, two birds with one stone. Porter is a multi-skilled SF who can shoot and defend and was a former number 3 overall pick who only missed last season due to injury. He would start for us instantly. Smith would be gone and Monroe could step in as our go-to offensive big man. Our spacing would improve, our BBIQ would improve, and we would have an awesome young core of Drummond, Monroe, Porter, and KCP. Humphries and Blair would be helpful bigs off the bench too.
Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddie
Caldwell-Pope/Meeks
Porter/Butler/Singler
Monroe/Jerebko/Humphries/Blair
Drummond/Monroe/Anthony
Thoughts?
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,290
- And1: 532
- Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
Im with it he would be great for us
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,587
- And1: 4,464
- Joined: Aug 29, 2014
-
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
- engelbert321
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,396
- And1: 1,463
- Joined: Jul 24, 2011
-
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
DetroitPistons wrote:I'm not sure I want to give up assets for a guy that is buried on the Magic bench. He could pan out but I don't know if it's worth it. I was thinking of Smith trades that would get us a SF and I came up with this trade with WAS that would need to wait until Dec 25th:
Josh Smith, 2015 1st rounder
for
Otto Porter, Kris Humphries, Dejuan Blair, Rasual Butler
Why for WAS? They get another piece to try and put them over the top. Smith becomes a 4th or 5th offensive option behind Wall, Beal, Pierce, and maybe even Gortat. Nene becomes a super sub that can back up the 4 and 5 and gives them an improved big man rotation. They also get a pick for taking on the risk and giving up Porter. Porter would also be stuck behind Pierce and Webster (when he returns) in the rotation so they won't be losing much.
Wall/Miller
Beal/Temple/Rice
Pierce/Webster
Smith/Nene/Gooden
Gortat/Nene/Seraphin
Why for DET? We can waive Mitchell, Datome, and Butler to make roster space. We sacrifice a pick to dump Smith and get our SF of the future, two birds with one stone. Porter is a multi-skilled SF who can shoot and defend and was a former number 3 overall pick who only missed last season due to injury. He would start for us instantly. Smith would be gone and Monroe could step in as our go-to offensive big man. Our spacing would improve, our BBIQ would improve, and we would have an awesome young core of Drummond, Monroe, Porter, and KCP. Humphries and Blair would be helpful bigs off the bench too.
Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddie
Caldwell-Pope/Meeks
Porter/Butler/Singler
Monroe/Jerebko/Humphries/Blair
Drummond/Monroe/Anthony
Thoughts?
We're giving up a first rounder for Otto Porter? He might turn to be a stud, but eh.... I'd rather try my luck in the draft
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
ComboGuardCity wrote:He's buried in Orlando and they have prospects they value more than him. He's a tenacious defender, has improved his jumpshot, and is still very young. He's definitely a better fit than Singler and I bet he can be had for pennies.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
If he's cheap i don't see why not. he shoots 33% from 3 which i think puts him out of consideration for SVG.
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,619
- And1: 1,101
- Joined: Dec 27, 2012
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
I like Mo Harkless he'd be great for the Pistons future. I'd rather get him in FA than trade for him there's no rush. Unless their trying to take Smith off our hands.
Top SFs we could steal/trade for:
Kahwi Leonard
Jimmy Butler
Perry Jones 3
Moe Harkless
Otto Porter
Jae Crowder
AminuÂ
Top SFs we could draft:
Stanley Johnson
Kelly Oubre
Justise Winslow
Rondae Hollis
These are young because I'm thinking about their fit with the big 4 of Drummond Monroe kcP Dinwiddie
Top SFs we could steal/trade for:
Kahwi Leonard
Jimmy Butler
Perry Jones 3
Moe Harkless
Otto Porter
Jae Crowder
AminuÂ
Top SFs we could draft:
Stanley Johnson
Kelly Oubre
Justise Winslow
Rondae Hollis
These are young because I'm thinking about their fit with the big 4 of Drummond Monroe kcP Dinwiddie
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,619
- And1: 1,101
- Joined: Dec 27, 2012
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kHiMGeOhygE
[youtube]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kHiMGeOhygE[/youtube]
[youtube]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kHiMGeOhygE[/youtube]
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,545
- And1: 836
- Joined: Jul 11, 2002
- Contact:
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
I support this idea!
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,226
- And1: 612
- Joined: Feb 09, 2005
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
vic wrote:I like Mo Harkless he'd be great for the Pistons future. I'd rather get him in FA than trade for him there's no rush. Unless their trying to take Smith off our hands.
Top SFs we could steal/trade for:
Kahwi Leonard
Jimmy Butler
Perry Jones 3
Moe Harkless
Otto Porter
Jae Crowder
AminuÂ
Top SFs we could draft:
Stanley Johnson
Kelly Oubre
Justise Winslow
Rondae Hollis
These are young because I'm thinking about their fit with the big 4 of Drummond Monroe kcP Dinwiddie
Kawhi leonard? come on bruh
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,973
- And1: 4,897
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
fekz wrote:vic wrote:I like Mo Harkless he'd be great for the Pistons future. I'd rather get him in FA than trade for him there's no rush. Unless their trying to take Smith off our hands.
Top SFs we could steal/trade for:
Kahwi Leonard
Jimmy Butler
Perry Jones 3
Moe Harkless
Otto Porter
Jae Crowder
AminuÂ
Top SFs we could draft:
Stanley Johnson
Kelly Oubre
Justise Winslow
Rondae Hollis
These are young because I'm thinking about their fit with the big 4 of Drummond Monroe kcP Dinwiddie
Kawhi leonard? come on bruh
Yeah butler and Leonard aren't going anywhere.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
- Blkbrd671
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,862
- And1: 4,819
- Joined: Oct 05, 2010
- Location: Guam,USA
-
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
ComboGuardCity wrote:
Yeah butler and Leonard aren't going anywhere.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Don't both want max contracts and both teams aren't willing?
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,113
- And1: 3,441
- Joined: Apr 19, 2010
- Location: Michigan
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
engelbert321 wrote:DetroitPistons wrote:I'm not sure I want to give up assets for a guy that is buried on the Magic bench. He could pan out but I don't know if it's worth it. I was thinking of Smith trades that would get us a SF and I came up with this trade with WAS that would need to wait until Dec 25th:
Josh Smith, 2015 1st rounder
for
Otto Porter, Kris Humphries, Dejuan Blair, Rasual Butler
Why for WAS? They get another piece to try and put them over the top. Smith becomes a 4th or 5th offensive option behind Wall, Beal, Pierce, and maybe even Gortat. Nene becomes a super sub that can back up the 4 and 5 and gives them an improved big man rotation. They also get a pick for taking on the risk and giving up Porter. Porter would also be stuck behind Pierce and Webster (when he returns) in the rotation so they won't be losing much.
Wall/Miller
Beal/Temple/Rice
Pierce/Webster
Smith/Nene/Gooden
Gortat/Nene/Seraphin
Why for DET? We can waive Mitchell, Datome, and Butler to make roster space. We sacrifice a pick to dump Smith and get our SF of the future, two birds with one stone. Porter is a multi-skilled SF who can shoot and defend and was a former number 3 overall pick who only missed last season due to injury. He would start for us instantly. Smith would be gone and Monroe could step in as our go-to offensive big man. Our spacing would improve, our BBIQ would improve, and we would have an awesome young core of Drummond, Monroe, Porter, and KCP. Humphries and Blair would be helpful bigs off the bench too.
Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddie
Caldwell-Pope/Meeks
Porter/Butler/Singler
Monroe/Jerebko/Humphries/Blair
Drummond/Monroe/Anthony
Thoughts?
We're giving up a first rounder for Otto Porter? He might turn to be a stud, but eh.... I'd rather try my luck in the draft
Otto Porter (3rd overall pick btw) AND we dump Smith. I'll take Porter and and dumping Smith's contract over our odds in the lottery, especially since I think we will be better than last year.
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,857
- And1: 2,460
- Joined: Sep 28, 2012
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
DetroitPistons wrote:engelbert321 wrote:DetroitPistons wrote:I'm not sure I want to give up assets for a guy that is buried on the Magic bench. He could pan out but I don't know if it's worth it. I was thinking of Smith trades that would get us a SF and I came up with this trade with WAS that would need to wait until Dec 25th:
Josh Smith, 2015 1st rounder
for
Otto Porter, Kris Humphries, Dejuan Blair, Rasual Butler
Why for WAS? They get another piece to try and put them over the top. Smith becomes a 4th or 5th offensive option behind Wall, Beal, Pierce, and maybe even Gortat. Nene becomes a super sub that can back up the 4 and 5 and gives them an improved big man rotation. They also get a pick for taking on the risk and giving up Porter. Porter would also be stuck behind Pierce and Webster (when he returns) in the rotation so they won't be losing much.
Wall/Miller
Beal/Temple/Rice
Pierce/Webster
Smith/Nene/Gooden
Gortat/Nene/Seraphin
Why for DET? We can waive Mitchell, Datome, and Butler to make roster space. We sacrifice a pick to dump Smith and get our SF of the future, two birds with one stone. Porter is a multi-skilled SF who can shoot and defend and was a former number 3 overall pick who only missed last season due to injury. He would start for us instantly. Smith would be gone and Monroe could step in as our go-to offensive big man. Our spacing would improve, our BBIQ would improve, and we would have an awesome young core of Drummond, Monroe, Porter, and KCP. Humphries and Blair would be helpful bigs off the bench too.
Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddie
Caldwell-Pope/Meeks
Porter/Butler/Singler
Monroe/Jerebko/Humphries/Blair
Drummond/Monroe/Anthony
Thoughts?
We're giving up a first rounder for Otto Porter? He might turn to be a stud, but eh.... I'd rather try my luck in the draft
Otto Porter (3rd overall pick btw) AND we dump Smith. I'll take Porter and and dumping Smith's contract over our odds in the lottery, especially since I think we will be better than last year.
Lets do that same deal for Evan Turner instead. He was a 2nd overall pick.
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,113
- And1: 3,441
- Joined: Apr 19, 2010
- Location: Michigan
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
DetroitSho wrote:Lets do that same deal for Evan Turner instead. He was a 2nd overall pick.
Turner has had several years to prove he is a bust. Porter has just been injured and has looked pretty good when he has actually gotten onto the floor. Again, we would also be dumping Smith.
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,479
- And1: 6,765
- Joined: May 04, 2006
- Location: Ohio
-
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
I'd rather have Tobias Harris. Really wanted him last year...I think she should have offered Monroe for a package of Afflalo & Harris but nooooooooo....
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,857
- And1: 2,460
- Joined: Sep 28, 2012
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
DetroitPistons wrote:engelbert321 wrote:DetroitPistons wrote:I'm not sure I want to give up assets for a guy that is buried on the Magic bench. He could pan out but I don't know if it's worth it. I was thinking of Smith trades that would get us a SF and I came up with this trade with WAS that would need to wait until Dec 25th:
Josh Smith, 2015 1st rounder
for
Otto Porter, Kris Humphries, Dejuan Blair, Rasual Butler
Why for WAS? They get another piece to try and put them over the top. Smith becomes a 4th or 5th offensive option behind Wall, Beal, Pierce, and maybe even Gortat. Nene becomes a super sub that can back up the 4 and 5 and gives them an improved big man rotation. They also get a pick for taking on the risk and giving up Porter. Porter would also be stuck behind Pierce and Webster (when he returns) in the rotation so they won't be losing much.
Wall/Miller
Beal/Temple/Rice
Pierce/Webster
Smith/Nene/Gooden
Gortat/Nene/Seraphin
Why for DET? We can waive Mitchell, Datome, and Butler to make roster space. We sacrifice a pick to dump Smith and get our SF of the future, two birds with one stone. Porter is a multi-skilled SF who can shoot and defend and was a former number 3 overall pick who only missed last season due to injury. He would start for us instantly. Smith would be gone and Monroe could step in as our go-to offensive big man. Our spacing would improve, our BBIQ would improve, and we would have an awesome young core of Drummond, Monroe, Porter, and KCP. Humphries and Blair would be helpful bigs off the bench too.
Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddie
Caldwell-Pope/Meeks
Porter/Butler/Singler
Monroe/Jerebko/Humphries/Blair
Drummond/Monroe/Anthony
Thoughts?
We're giving up a first rounder for Otto Porter? He might turn to be a stud, but eh.... I'd rather try my luck in the draft
Otto Porter (3rd overall pick btw) AND we dump Smith. I'll take Porter and and dumping Smith's contract over our odds in the lottery, especially since I think we will be better than last year.
My point was his draft position means nothing and adds no extra value for us.
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,831
- And1: 928
- Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
DetroitPistons wrote:
Otto Porter (3rd overall pick btw) AND we dump Smith. I'll take Porter and and dumping Smith's contract over our odds in the lottery, especially since I think we will be better than last year.
Any deal involving dumping Smith is one we should consider making at this point
But Otto Porter sucks and is not worth our pick in 2015
Make the deal Porter, Humphries, Trash for Smith
Washington keeps DeJuan Blair and they trade Porter for the chance to become a real threat in the East
Wall - Beal - Pierce - Smith - Nene/Gortat is a sick lineup
Meanwhile for us Humphries/Anthony will back up Monroe/Drummond and Porter gets a legit shot at starting SF
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,587
- And1: 4,464
- Joined: Aug 29, 2014
-
Re: Potential Long Term SF: Mo Harkless
DetroitPistons wrote:I'm not sure I want to give up assets for a guy that is buried on the Magic bench. He could pan out but I don't know if it's worth it. I was thinking of Smith trades that would get us a SF and I came up with this trade with WAS that would need to wait until Dec 25th:
Josh Smith, 2015 1st rounder
for
Otto Porter, Kris Humphries, Dejuan Blair, Rasual Butler
Why for WAS? They get another piece to try and put them over the top. Smith becomes a 4th or 5th offensive option behind Wall, Beal, Pierce, and maybe even Gortat. Nene becomes a super sub that can back up the 4 and 5 and gives them an improved big man rotation. They also get a pick for taking on the risk and giving up Porter. Porter would also be stuck behind Pierce and Webster (when he returns) in the rotation so they won't be losing much.
Wall/Miller
Beal/Temple/Rice
Pierce/Webster
Smith/Nene/Gooden
Gortat/Nene/Seraphin
Why for DET? We can waive Mitchell, Datome, and Butler to make roster space. We sacrifice a pick to dump Smith and get our SF of the future, two birds with one stone. Porter is a multi-skilled SF who can shoot and defend and was a former number 3 overall pick who only missed last season due to injury. He would start for us instantly. Smith would be gone and Monroe could step in as our go-to offensive big man. Our spacing would improve, our BBIQ would improve, and we would have an awesome young core of Drummond, Monroe, Porter, and KCP. Humphries and Blair would be helpful bigs off the bench too.
Jennings/Augustin/Dinwiddie
Caldwell-Pope/Meeks
Porter/Butler/Singler
Monroe/Jerebko/Humphries/Blair
Drummond/Monroe/Anthony
Thoughts?
Wish this would happen but the Wizards would be crazy if they made that trade. I'm not even the type to bash players but Josh Smith is butt cheeks.
Championships