ImageImageImage

Let's Get NETS

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Let's Get NETS 

Post#1 » by vic » Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:59 pm

Can we get Deron Williams and AK47 for Jennings and Smith?

Would the Nets do it? they are just trying to save money right? I'd take Joe Johnson too if we had too.

Gores needs to eat that cost for what he's put the Pistons fans through.

Deron Williams would be a great unselfish point guard to mentor Dinwiddie, and AK47 would be a good smart defensive SF. Joe Johnson immediately becomes starting SG.
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,570
And1: 20,134
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#2 » by MrBigShot » Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:39 pm

They'd save a lot of money, but is there any other incentive for them to do that other than saving money? Their owner is one of the richest in the NBA. Maybe moving in a different direction and tanking, but I don't think that's their goal. At 8 and 11 they are still the 8th seed. I think they are more likely to try and retool or try and trade for someone with a shorter contract to try and make some big signings this off season.

Taking on both DWill and Joe would put a damper on our cap space this summer. I'd rather have cap flexibility and go after some FAs this off season (Draymond Green, Dragic, Jimmy Butler, Tobias Harris, Knight, Matthews ect...)
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#3 » by MotownMadness » Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:51 pm

vic wrote:Can we get Deron Williams and AK47 for Jennings and Smith?

Would the Nets do it? they are just trying to save money right? I'd take Joe Johnson too if we had too.

Gores needs to eat that cost for what he's put the Pistons fans through.

Deron Williams would be a great unselfish point guard to mentor Dinwiddie, and AK47 would be a good smart defensive SF. Joe Johnson immediately becomes starting SG.

We definitely dont want both Johnsonson and Williams. They both make LeBron james type of money. I would however trade Smith and Jennings for one of them, Preferably Johnson seeing as he only has 2 years left and would actually fill a need here.
User avatar
Ghost
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,452
And1: 509
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
Location: Hell
 

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#4 » by Ghost » Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:52 pm

MrBigShot wrote:They'd save a lot of money, but is there any other incentive for them to do that other than saving money? Their owner is one of the richest in the NBA. Maybe moving in a different direction and tanking, but I don't think that's their goal. At 8 and 11 they are still the 8th seed. I think they are more likely to try and retool or try and trade for someone with a shorter contract to try and make some big signings this off season.

Taking on both DWill and Joe would put a damper on our cap space this summer. I'd rather have cap flexibility and go after some FAs this off season (Draymond Green, Dragic, Jimmy Butler, Tobias Harris, Knight, Matthews ect...)

They don't have their firsts :lol:. Ainge kind of raped them.

Their incentive for doing DWill for Smith/Jennings type would be that Jennings contract is 2 years while DWILL is 3, so they get out of 7M of the contract a year early (if they did Johnson for Smith/Jennings, we get out of Smith's contract a year early). Also, even though DWill healthy may be better, we all know his ankles are a **** timebomb. This also provides stability in the terms of health of their players. :lol:

Our incentive would be the addition by subtraction situation+when healthy DWill will work with Drummond/Monroe very well. The bad news is that we lose 7M of cap next-next offseason, as well as potentially winning more games because of Williams :/ (who is clearly not a long term solution).
(This also applies to Johnson)
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#5 » by MotownMadness » Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:58 pm

Ghost wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:They'd save a lot of money, but is there any other incentive for them to do that other than saving money? Their owner is one of the richest in the NBA. Maybe moving in a different direction and tanking, but I don't think that's their goal. At 8 and 11 they are still the 8th seed. I think they are more likely to try and retool or try and trade for someone with a shorter contract to try and make some big signings this off season.

Taking on both DWill and Joe would put a damper on our cap space this summer. I'd rather have cap flexibility and go after some FAs this off season (Draymond Green, Dragic, Jimmy Butler, Tobias Harris, Knight, Matthews ect...)

They don't have their firsts :lol:. Ainge kind of raped them.

Their incentive for doing DWill for Smith/Jennings type would be that Jennings contract is 2 years while DWILL is 3, so they get out of 7M of the contract a year early (if they did Johnson for Smith/Jennings, we get out of Smith's contract a year early). Also, even though DWill healthy may be better, we all know his ankles are a **** timebomb. This also provides stability in the terms of health of their players. :lol:

Our incentive would be the addition by subtraction situation+when healthy DWill will work with Drummond/Monroe very well. The bad news is that we lose 7M of cap next-next offseason, as well as potentially winning more games because of Williams :/ (who is clearly not a long term solution).
(This also applies to Johnson)

The part that scares me is that we would start winning a few games. Getting top 3 pick this year is a must for this franchise. Smith and Jennings are the main reasons why we suck so bad, So we should at least wait until the deadline too see if we can fall so far back in the standings that it isn't a concern. Honestly I would like to try for another top pick next year as well. This team just needs more talent and assets before it moves forward.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,570
And1: 20,134
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#6 » by MrBigShot » Wed Dec 10, 2014 5:02 pm

Thanks for the correction. That is a good point, I think we can all agree that Williams, even at that contract, is leaps and bounds more valuable than Smith. But sitting at 3-19 right now, it's pretty clear the playoffs are more or less out of the picture. And having a chance at one of the better players in this draft would be a lot more preferable to being in no-man's with DWill.

All in all the Kings trade idea centered around Smith for Thompson/Williams is better imo.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,267
And1: 5,254
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#7 » by Kilo » Wed Dec 10, 2014 5:06 pm

AK47 is heading to Philly for along with a second rounder for a TE.

I wouldn't do Jennings/Smith for Deron Williams alone as Pistons are taking on too much money in 2016-2017 when Jennings has expired and only Smith/Deron are on the books for their final seasons under contract. If we're taking on $8-9M extra in the deal overall, we need to get some sweetener. I mean Detroit gave the 9th overall pick to Charlotte to take on the last year of Gordon's deal - so basically the 9th overall pick was sold for $12M, Brooklyn doesn't have a first rounder in forever so I'd want Plumlee.

Deron also has pretty significant health red flags as well - ankles are sort of important to point guards with all the direction changes, the stops and starts etc.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#8 » by vic » Wed Dec 10, 2014 5:35 pm

Cap space would be good....

Maybe the best move would be Smith for AK47 plus whatever.

I agree longterm flexibility and keeping money is most important.
I think we need to keep the age range of our core in the early twenties. All the more reason to get rid of Smith. Gotta get rid of smith.

I love the Smith for Williams too. Anything to end this madness
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#9 » by ImHeisenberg » Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:11 pm

What's the point of a win-now trade? This team would have to exceptional over the next 60 games to just make the 8th seed.

Starting out like this had put the team in a hole that it can't realistically climb their way out. They'd have to go on a 15 game winning streak (franchise record) just to get to .500.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#10 » by DBC10 » Wed Dec 10, 2014 7:04 pm

The reason why the Nets are trading AK's contract is to save them from minimum of 12 mil in luxury tax, even though his contract is like 3 mil or so left. They're trying to save money and stockpile assets. I'd try and get Joe since his is ending soon iirc for Smith.
Skates
Head Coach
Posts: 7,306
And1: 3,851
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
       

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#11 » by Skates » Wed Dec 10, 2014 7:09 pm

In the short term your team would be better with Deron replacing Josh Smith and Jennings, assuming he stays healthy, but you probably move into the middle of the lottery at best, allowing you to draft a player who can help you reach the latter portion of the lottery, maybe scratch out an eighth seed in a weak East. Then what?

Monroe will still likely leave unless you pay him the home team max, which he is far from being worth. Nice player, but not a full, Bird's rights max guy. Solid guy in KCP and potential star in Drummond, plus Deron and a decent, not great lottery pick. So you either have that with Monroe walking, or with an overpaid Monroe eating up way too much cap space on the roster. It is a recipe for mediocrity, and if Drummond really does blossom, he won't stay if you can't give him the one per team top max because you gave it to Monroe.

Don't grab at straws, accept the opportunity to rebuild the right way around Drummond and Pope. The Nets are toxic for a reason. Don't let SVG be your Doug Collins (five former, current or future first rounders traded for Bynum/Moultrie and the carcass of Jason Richardson by DC, there really wasn't much left for Hinkie to blow up), trust me, it never, ever ends well.
sfballa13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,831
And1: 928
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#12 » by sfballa13 » Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:24 pm

Jennings, Smith, Monroe for JJ, Teletovic is the best we will ever hope to get in a trade

We are stuck paying Jennings/Smith 21M next year anyways why not give that money to JJ to play SF and spend our cap space as intended on Dragic and a PF replacement

Even if we get Joe Johnson the fact our PF rotation will be Teletovic/Jerebko and our PG rotation will be Augustin/Dinwiddie pretty much guarantees us a top 5 finish in the lottery anyways

If Gores wants a trade he wants the JJ one not the Thompson/Williams deal, if that is even still available to us at this point. We dump Jennings/Smith for JJ, someone who will bring fans to the Palace and turn our loser mentality culture around
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#13 » by The Penguin » Wed Dec 10, 2014 11:28 pm

Do people realize how bad DWill's contract is? Take Smith's remaining years and basically double the money (after his trade kicker) and that's D-Will's deal.

Heck yes to Josh Smith for Joe Johnson, that balances us a bit and takes a year off Smith's deal at the cost of losing some cap space this summer. Walk away from D-Will though.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,753
And1: 22,818
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#14 » by MotownMadness » Wed Dec 10, 2014 11:52 pm

The Penguin wrote:Do people realize how bad DWill's contract is? Take Smith's remaining years and basically double the money (after his trade kicker) and that's D-Will's deal.

Heck yes to Josh Smith for Joe Johnson, that balances us a bit and takes a year off Smith's deal at the cost of losing some cap space this summer. Walk away from D-Will though.

D Will has a bad contract for sure but hes still a much better player then Jennings and Smith. Smennings contracts together are basically the same amount as Williams. His contract is the same length as Smiths but a year longer then Jennings.

That trade would no doubt make us a better team by subtracting two atrocious overpaid players for a avereage ovepaid one. Williams stats this season arent bad-

17.1 ppg
43 fg%
40 3pt%
90 ft%
6.5 apg
3.4 rpg
1.1 stls
17.6 PER
57 TS%

Obviously not worth 20 mil per but he would still be our best player while getting rid of possibly the two most damaging team players in the league.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#15 » by The Penguin » Thu Dec 11, 2014 12:01 am

MotownMadness wrote:
The Penguin wrote:Do people realize how bad DWill's contract is? Take Smith's remaining years and basically double the money (after his trade kicker) and that's D-Will's deal.

Heck yes to Josh Smith for Joe Johnson, that balances us a bit and takes a year off Smith's deal at the cost of losing some cap space this summer. Walk away from D-Will though.

D Will has a bad contract for sure but hes still a much better player then Jennings and Smith. Smennings contracts together are basically the same amount as Williams. His contract is the same length as Smiths but a year longer then Jennings.

That trade would no doubt make us a better team by subtracting two atrocious overpaid players for a avereage ovepaid one. Williams stats this season arent bad-

17.1 ppg
43 fg%
40 3pt%
90 ft%
6.5 apg
3.4 rpg
1.1 stls
17.6 PER
57 TS%

Obviously not worth 20 mil per but he would still be our best player while getting rid of possibly the two most damaging team players in the league.



Which might make us good enough to screw up our draft pick but nowhere near ever winning a title with D-Will and leaves us with over $60 mil committed to a 30 year old with 2 bad ankles. We don't need a best player who is no longer an all star, is on the wrong side of 30, has an attitude as bad as Smith & Jennings.
User avatar
kurtis48239
General Manager
Posts: 8,005
And1: 1,056
Joined: May 19, 2011
       

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#16 » by kurtis48239 » Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:10 am

Honestly if we traded for D-will,he would become our best player and stan would probably ride him and cause him an injury for the rest of the season.

I would LOVE to have johnson on this team,but he would screw our lottery chances for a top pick,and we really do need to add good young talent to this team,which is also good for trades later on down the line (when you do it right and dont let them become a fa and walk lol)

We need to ride out this season,see if we can trade smith for anything,as long as it gets us out of smiths contract early.We need to play the youth and develope them for next year,and we need to go after a pg and a sf with next years cap space.Iam would love to add dragic and any 3 & D small forward.
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#17 » by mattao313 » Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:08 am

Yea I agree with kurtis I would have a top pick and over pay a SF in FA than JJ.
Championships
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#18 » by DBC10 » Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:18 am

kurtis48239 wrote:Honestly if we traded for D-will,he would become our best player and stan would probably ride him and cause him an injury for the rest of the season.

I would LOVE to have johnson on this team,but he would screw our lottery chances for a top pick,and we really do need to add good young talent to this team,which is also good for trades later on down the line (when you do it right and dont let them become a fa and walk lol)

We need to ride out this season,see if we can trade smith for anything,as long as it gets us out of smiths contract early.We need to play the youth and develope them for next year,and we need to go after a pg and a sf with next years cap space.Iam would love to add dragic and any 3 & D small forward.


Agreed with ya bro. I'm on board with getting Joe Jesus as much as anyone but that might make us go into this year's draft at the 8th spot again.

I think us losing Smith might make us more competitive since the young guns will have more intensity and fire to do well, which would cause us to overperform and lose our spot in the draft lol.
sfballa13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,831
And1: 928
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#19 » by sfballa13 » Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:07 am

DBC10 wrote:
kurtis48239 wrote:Honestly if we traded for D-will,he would become our best player and stan would probably ride him and cause him an injury for the rest of the season.

I would LOVE to have johnson on this team,but he would screw our lottery chances for a top pick,and we really do need to add good young talent to this team,which is also good for trades later on down the line (when you do it right and dont let them become a fa and walk lol)

We need to ride out this season,see if we can trade smith for anything,as long as it gets us out of smiths contract early.We need to play the youth and develope them for next year,and we need to go after a pg and a sf with next years cap space.Iam would love to add dragic and any 3 & D small forward.


Agreed with ya bro. I'm on board with getting Joe Jesus as much as anyone but that might make us go into this year's draft at the 8th spot again.

I think us losing Smith might make us more competitive since the young guns will have more intensity and fire to do well, which would cause us to overperform and lose our spot in the draft lol.


Rather go into the draft in the 5-8th spot and lose Smith and have JJ bc with our dumb luck we wont even get in the top 5 anyways
Sheeeeed
Starter
Posts: 2,259
And1: 326
Joined: May 30, 2011
       

Re: Let's Get NETS 

Post#20 » by Sheeeeed » Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:13 am

Trading Smith/Jennings for D-Will would be nothing but a lateral move. Hes a cancer, and SVG referred to him as the most overrated player in the NBA last year when he was still unemployed.

Return to Detroit Pistons