ImageImageImage

Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#1 » by Blkbrd671 » Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:38 pm

They appear to be just fine at small forward and center, with Kyle Singler and Andre Drummond ranked firmly in the middle of the league. And while Brandon Jennings has been on the decline lately, he's still among the top 20 starters at point guard.



Josh Smith leads the team in shot attempts and is second on the team in minutes played. Kentavious Caldwell-Pope leads the team in minutes and is second on the team in shot attempts. These two players who are the weakest links in the starting lineups have been allowed to have the greatest influence on the team. And their struggles have been mostly predictable, as their wins produced figures aren't horribly off from last year.


With simple tweaks to the rotation, it's possible that this team may be able to be competitive as is. Moving Butler and Monroe into the starting lineup gives Detroit five players who are in the middle of the league among starters. They'd have the seventh highest combined win shares per 48 minutes in the Eastern Conference, essentially making them look like a playoff team. And that's even before taking into account replacing Smith with Jerebko in the rotation and Meeks returning as soon as tomorrow.



SVG is a smart guy and i am sure he knows this or someone on his staff knows this. Yet he still continues to play with Smith.

Its either he's trying to advertise smith

He's ignoring monroe because he's gone any ways

Or he's over analyzing the simple solution.

i do like that he's force feeding KCP minutes, while its going to suck watching him go through growing pains and listening to all of you call him a bust, its best he gets as much experience as possible.



http://www.detroitbadboys.com/2014/12/1 ... stons-tank
princeofpalace
RealGM
Posts: 21,982
And1: 1,636
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#2 » by princeofpalace » Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:53 pm

While I have very low opinions of both Pistons blog sites- DBB and PP- I do agree with their analysis on this issue-SVG's rotations are horrible as I've said in numerous game threads.

I am not encouraged when I read that Larry Brown- a guy who won us a championship but has never been able to coach up a bad team as evidenced by his stints with NKY and CHA, is giving SVG advice to stay the course.
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,523
And1: 1,228
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#3 » by Warspite » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:39 am

in the 15 yrs I have been reading RealGM every coach that has been with the Pistons has had bad rotations. I refuse to believe that Pistons fans on RealGM are smarter than Brown, SVG, Flip, and most likely Daley.


The arrogance IMHO is unbecoming.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#4 » by The Penguin » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:05 am

Stan is driving the stealth tank. Blatantly tanking incures the wrath of the lotto gods.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,570
And1: 20,134
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#5 » by MrBigShot » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:06 am

Warspite wrote:in the 15 yrs I have been reading RealGM every coach that has been with the Pistons has had bad rotations. I refuse to believe that Pistons fans on RealGM are smarter than Brown, SVG, Flip, and most likely Daley.


The arrogance IMHO is unbecoming.


Don't get me wrong, I don't think any coach out there would turn this roster into a good team by any means, but I don't think we're bad enough to be 3-19. We were 10-10 with Mo Cheeks at one point last year with the same core more or less, and he's clearly a worse can than SVG.

Any rotation with this current roster featuring Josh Smith playing major minutes has issues. Last two games he's only played 22 minutes or so, so I can't really complain. Would like to see that continue honestly, because playing him to increase his value doesn't work when he plays really poorly.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
User avatar
engelbert321
Head Coach
Posts: 7,396
And1: 1,463
Joined: Jul 24, 2011
 

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#6 » by engelbert321 » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:28 am

Warspite wrote:in the 15 yrs I have been reading RealGM every coach that has been with the Pistons has had bad rotations. I refuse to believe that Pistons fans on RealGM are smarter than Brown, SVG, Flip, and most likely Daley.


The arrogance IMHO is unbecoming.

Well our record speaks for itself
epheisey
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,443
And1: 409
Joined: Jul 23, 2010
         

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#7 » by epheisey » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:49 am

This team's shooting is driving the Piston's tank. As a TEAM, we're shooting 40.4% from the field. Compared to almost 44.7% last season. That's AWFUL. Absolutely awful. We are last in the league. Next closest, is Philly, at a crazy 41.4%.

You change that one thing, and this team will start winning games. And when Meeks returns and as the season goes on, I'd bet it starts to creep up slowly.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#8 » by Pharaoh » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:57 am

"Its either he's trying to advertise smith"

We KNOW that is true!

"He's ignoring monroe because he's gone any ways"

No, he's not ignoring Monroe, he's showcasing Smith while trying to develop Dre

"i do like that he's force feeding KCP minutes, while its going to suck watching him go through growing pains and listening to all of you call him a bust, its best he gets as much experience as possible."

Agree, & the Meeks injury is the main reason why KCP has been put in thar position

Sent from my GT-I9300 using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#9 » by Blkbrd671 » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:58 am

Warspite wrote:in the 15 yrs I have been reading RealGM every coach that has been with the Pistons has had bad rotations. I refuse to believe that Pistons fans on RealGM are smarter than Brown, SVG, Flip, and most likely Daley.


The arrogance IMHO is unbecoming.


I agree, i think i was relatively happy with Cheeks rotations though. While i personally don't think i am even close tot he bball iq of those coaches, i do struggle to understand this.


Smith> Monroe ......In the small samples we got with Moose and dre, our team seemed a lot better (eyeball test)


Augustine> Dinwiddie.....Augustine is having a horrid shooting strech, seems to give up leads more than hold them and defensively gets abused by bigger guards. Dinwiddie couldn't possible be any worst and in the short minutes we do see him, he's at very least on par with current DJ

Jonas Jerebko not in the rotation......when jj's playing there's a little more energy to the team, we have a lot more hustle and we have much better shooting. This is probably my biggest question, we are shooting horrible right now and the one big guy we have that shooting well, we have him benched
User avatar
Manocad
RealGM
Posts: 69,969
And1: 10,562
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Middle Fingerton
Contact:
       

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#10 » by Manocad » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:09 am

epheisey wrote:This team's shooting is driving the Piston's tank. As a TEAM, we're shooting 40.4% from the field. Compared to almost 44.7% last season. That's AWFUL. Absolutely awful. We are last in the league. Next closest, is Philly, at a crazy 41.4%.

You change that one thing, and this team will start winning games.

ding ding ding...winner
Image
User avatar
Blkbrd671
RealGM
Posts: 30,862
And1: 4,819
Joined: Oct 05, 2010
Location: Guam,USA
       

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#11 » by Blkbrd671 » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:19 am

epheisey wrote:This team's shooting is driving the Piston's tank. As a TEAM, we're shooting 40.4% from the field. Compared to almost 44.7% last season. That's AWFUL. Absolutely awful. We are last in the league. Next closest, is Philly, at a crazy 41.4%.

You change that one thing, and this team will start winning games. And when Meeks returns and as the season goes on, I'd bet it starts to creep up slowly.



Well we also need to learn how to stop teams, no point in shooting a better % if we can't keep the other team from matching. I believe 100 ppg is our magic number , if we can keep teams under 100 we can wein
ImHeisenberg
Head Coach
Posts: 6,465
And1: 2,323
Joined: Apr 01, 2013
 

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#12 » by ImHeisenberg » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:38 am

That is just a blog site- very little in terms of credibility on DBB. It's mostly just a hive mind circle jerk.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
epheisey
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,443
And1: 409
Joined: Jul 23, 2010
         

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#13 » by epheisey » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:40 am

Blkbrd671 wrote:
epheisey wrote:This team's shooting is driving the Piston's tank. As a TEAM, we're shooting 40.4% from the field. Compared to almost 44.7% last season. That's AWFUL. Absolutely awful. We are last in the league. Next closest, is Philly, at a crazy 41.4%.

You change that one thing, and this team will start winning games. And when Meeks returns and as the season goes on, I'd bet it starts to creep up slowly.



Well we also need to learn how to stop teams, no point in shooting a better % if we can't keep the other team from matching. I believe 100 ppg is our magic number , if we can keep teams under 100 we can wein


We're giving up 99.5 ppg. So we've met your magic number.
User avatar
mercury
Head Coach
Posts: 6,407
And1: 679
Joined: Jul 22, 2003

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#14 » by mercury » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:46 am

Warspite wrote:in the 15 yrs I have been reading RealGM every coach that has been with the Pistons has had bad rotations. I refuse to believe that Pistons fans on RealGM are smarter than Brown, SVG, Flip, and most likely Daley.


The arrogance IMHO is unbecoming.

Well said Warspite... nobody here has a better understanding of the personnel than SVG or better basketball knowledge... what we don't know is the long term plan... we tend to live in the moment vs what's best in the long run.
15 years already?
Lucidity
Banned User
Posts: 1,701
And1: 470
Joined: Oct 08, 2014

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#15 » by Lucidity » Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:15 am

Josh Smith being the featured scoring option along with next to no shooting is the difference between 3-20 & .500 ish. The Portland game was a prime example of that.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
epheisey
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,443
And1: 409
Joined: Jul 23, 2010
         

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#16 » by epheisey » Fri Dec 12, 2014 5:53 am

Lucidity wrote:Josh Smith being the featured scoring option along with next to no shooting is the difference between 3-20 & .500 ish. The Portland game was a prime example of that.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


This team isn't even close to being .500 even if Smoove didn't play a single minute all season. Keep blaming the season on him but the reality is, this whole team sucks. He's not shooting well, no question about it. But no one on this team is shooting well.
vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#17 » by vic » Fri Dec 12, 2014 5:54 am

epheisey wrote:This team's shooting is driving the Piston's tank. As a TEAM, we're shooting 40.4% from the field. Compared to almost 44.7% last season. That's AWFUL. Absolutely awful. We are last in the league. Next closest, is Philly, at a crazy 41.4%.

You change that one thing, and this team will start winning games. And when Meeks returns and as the season goes on, I'd bet it starts to creep up slowly.


And the reason these professional basketball players are not shooting well goes back to SVG:
- Bad rotations giving the most shots to the worst shooter: Smith, and calling plays that turn the highest percentage shooter to a horrible shooter (Drummond)
- bad rotations that play 3 bigs and/or feature 1on1 style play, when most teams are taking advantage of new rules that give preference to spacing and ball movement
- bad rotations draining the life out of players that subconsciously know they are being put in position to fail instead of beig put in position to succeed

Bonus:
- bad rotations playing small guardS (leave Dinwiddie on the bench) with unathletic SFs, literally the worst combination possible on defense
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
epheisey
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,443
And1: 409
Joined: Jul 23, 2010
         

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#18 » by epheisey » Fri Dec 12, 2014 5:56 am

vic wrote:
epheisey wrote:This team's shooting is driving the Piston's tank. As a TEAM, we're shooting 40.4% from the field. Compared to almost 44.7% last season. That's AWFUL. Absolutely awful. We are last in the league. Next closest, is Philly, at a crazy 41.4%.

You change that one thing, and this team will start winning games. And when Meeks returns and as the season goes on, I'd bet it starts to creep up slowly.


And the reason these professional basketball players are not shooting well goes back to SVG:
- Bad rotations giving the most shots to the worst shooter: Smith, and calling plays that turn the highest percentage shooter to a horrible shooter (Drummond)
- bad rotations that play 3 bigs and/or feature 1on1 style play, when most teams are taking advantage of new rules that give preference to spacing and ball movement
- bad rotations draining the life out of players that subconsciously know they are being put in position to fail instead of beig put in position to succeed
- bad rotations playing small guardS (leave Dinwiddie on the bench) with unathletic SFs, literally the worst combination possible on defense


So you're saying, that Mo Cheeks and John Loyer were calling better plays and offering better rotations than STAN VAN GUNDY?

Idk what games you've been watching, but these misses aren't difficult shots. Smith has shot less from farther out and he's still missing easy shots.

Andre I'll give a pass because he's working on shots and post ups that he's clearly not very comfortable with, but it's a necessary step in developing his offensive game.

There might be something related to SVG is doing that is causing this, but the only thing that I can come up with is that they're just exhausted from practices and their shot is suffering.

It is very odd though the ENTIRE team has all of a sudden struggled to make shots. I won't blame it on rotations, because there isn't a good solution to rotations or play calling for the players on this team. So I don't think it has anything to do with SVG's in game coaching. It has to be something outside of actual games.
Lucidity
Banned User
Posts: 1,701
And1: 470
Joined: Oct 08, 2014

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#19 » by Lucidity » Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:00 am

epheisey wrote:
Lucidity wrote:Josh Smith being the featured scoring option along with next to no shooting is the difference between 3-20 & .500 ish. The Portland game was a prime example of that.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


This team isn't even close to being .500 even if Smoove didn't play a single minute all season. Keep blaming the season on him but the reality is, this whole team sucks. He's not shooting well, no question about it. But no one on this team is shooting well.


Re read my post & try responding again. Not once did I blame the whole season on him. He has played a huge role in our utter failure the past 2 years but the coaches deserve just as much blame for forcing him to be something he's not. (A shooter or top offensive option, wing defender).


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: Stan Van Gundy rotations driving the Pistons 

Post#20 » by vic » Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:05 am

epheisey wrote:
vic wrote:
epheisey wrote:This team's shooting is driving the Piston's tank. As a TEAM, we're shooting 40.4% from the field. Compared to almost 44.7% last season. That's AWFUL. Absolutely awful. We are last in the league. Next closest, is Philly, at a crazy 41.4%.

You change that one thing, and this team will start winning games. And when Meeks returns and as the season goes on, I'd bet it starts to creep up slowly.


And the reason these professional basketball players are not shooting well goes back to SVG:
- Bad rotations giving the most shots to the worst shooter: Smith, and calling plays that turn the highest percentage shooter to a horrible shooter (Drummond)
- bad rotations that play 3 bigs and/or feature 1on1 style play, when most teams are taking advantage of new rules that give preference to spacing and ball movement
- bad rotations draining the life out of players that subconsciously know they are being put in position to fail instead of beig put in position to succeed
- bad rotations playing small guardS (leave Dinwiddie on the bench) with unathletic SFs, literally the worst combination possible on defense


So you're saying, that Mo Cheeks and John Loyer were calling better plays and offering better rotations than STAN VAN GUNDY?

Gohomevicyourdrunk


-For most of this season SVG started 3 bigs just like Cheeks & Loyer did
- except his defense doesn't gamble, so he's missing out on a large chunk of the offense they had last year
- for most of this season he had Drummond posting up instead of catching lobs
- he has his number one offensive player coming off the bench
- he doesn't have an instant offense Stuckey/Bynum to bring off the bench

If that's not rational to you, you are not worth talking to, so leave me alone.
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!

Return to Detroit Pistons