Whats holding Stanley Johnson Back?
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 7:14 am
http://pistonpowered.com/2015/12/28/what-is-holding-stanley-johnson-back/
i didn't agree with article but i can appreciate the evaluation. I am sure when you look at a shot chart or stats that SJ's shot selection is questionable, but when i review film, SJ, for the most part has great shot selection and for the most part looks to be doing what coach is asking him. Attack the rim, don't settle for 3, find your spots, and post ups(which is probably his weakess). His decision making also isn't as bad as article seems, he has his rookie moments, but usage wise i think he has less rookie moments than your average rook.
I am admitily bias when it comes to sJ as i think the world of him, but having watched every game he's played in the NBA, i really don't agree with the some of this assessment. I think SJ has improved as the season goes on and has focused on doing certain things better rather than all over the place. I'd argue he's is our best bench player
The takeaway here is predominantly positive. Johnson has the skills to be every bit as good a prospect as Winslow. He may lag a bit defensively, but he has more offensive talent. But holy cow does he ever need to work on his shot selection. Those two point jumpers are terrible! And that ignores all the times that he turns the ball over when he passes up a three point look to attempt a drive halfway to the rim. We can put some blame on the Pistons’ bench being so weak that Johnson is forced to take more shots than he really should. But Winslow could bring up the same excuse, and he’s not tanking his value with a ton of low percentage attempts. And as poor as Baynes, Blake, and company play at times, they can probably absorb a bit more usage at better nominal efficiency than 29%.
Stanley Johnson has actually converted his attempts at the rim and beyond the arc at significantly better rates than the other two. Those are the most valuable shots in the game. The problem is that he has shot more than a staggering triple the two point attempts of either of the others. And, probably because he has taken so many of those shots, he has hit them at abysmal rates. Even ignoring the value of putting opponents in foul trouble, the Pistons are 30% better off with Andre Drummond shooting free throws than with Johnson shooting a two from more than 3 feet out.
Hopefully Stan Van Gundy has noticed this same problem and is working with Johnson at improving his decision making. The Pistons have a solid prospect, but he’s not helping them right now nearly as much as he could be.
i didn't agree with article but i can appreciate the evaluation. I am sure when you look at a shot chart or stats that SJ's shot selection is questionable, but when i review film, SJ, for the most part has great shot selection and for the most part looks to be doing what coach is asking him. Attack the rim, don't settle for 3, find your spots, and post ups(which is probably his weakess). His decision making also isn't as bad as article seems, he has his rookie moments, but usage wise i think he has less rookie moments than your average rook.
I am admitily bias when it comes to sJ as i think the world of him, but having watched every game he's played in the NBA, i really don't agree with the some of this assessment. I think SJ has improved as the season goes on and has focused on doing certain things better rather than all over the place. I'd argue he's is our best bench player